Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Browse Every Case
313,007 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Parasset v. Gautier
Parasset versus Gautier. A CAPIAS had issued in this suit, returnable to the present Term ; but previously to the return of the writ, there had been a hearing before Judge Peters, at his chambers, upon a citation to shew cause, why the defe
Unites States v. Guinet
The Unites States versus Guinet, et al. THIS was an indictment against Etienne Guinet and John Baptist Le Maitre, for a misdemeanor in sitting out and arming Les Jumeaux (The Twins) in the port of Philadelphia, to be employed in the service
Miller v. Leonard
Miller versus Leonard, et al. THIS was an action of debt on a bond for £250, dated the 7th of May 1776. On the 16th of September 1778, a payment had been made of £150, in Continental money ; and the question now brought before the Court was
Haddens v. Chambers
Haddens versus Chambers.
Villeneuve v. Barrion
Villeneuve versus Barrion. IT was agreed by the parties to submit this question to the Court, to wit:—Whether the Convention gave to the French Consul cognizance of all differences and suits between Frenchmen; or confined the same to the de
Caignet v. Pettit
Caignet versus Pettit et. al. THIS was a Scire Facias against the defendants, as garnishees of Gilbaud, Rouge & Co. French citizens, residing in the West Indies. A rule was obtained by the defendants to shew cause why the proceedings should
Warder v. Carson's Executors
Warder et al. versus Carson's Executors. THIS was an action on a Foreign Bill of Exchange, brought by the indorsee against the executors of the indorsor, and a verdict was given for the plaintiff. A motion having been made and argued for a
Rapelje v. Emery
Rapelje versus Emery. A VERDICT having been taken for the plaintiff in this cause, subject to the opinion of the Court, the question (arising upon the same sails, set forth in the decision in the Common Pleas ant. 51.) was argued in April T
Burrall v. Du Blois
Burrall versus Du Blois. THIS cause was tried and a general verdict given for the plaintiff, on the 11th of September. On the 15th of September, Lewis made a motion, in arrest of judgment, because, a general verdict was taken, and the actio
Respublica v. Honeyman
Respublica versus Honeyman. THIS was a writ of error to remove the proceedings in tha case of a conviction for murder, at a Court of Oyer and Terminer, and general goal delivery, held in Allegheny County. On the return of the Record the def
Lloyd's Lessee v. Taylor
January Term, 1795. Lloyd's Lessee, versus Taylor. THE question, in this case, arose upon a devise, that after the death of the Testator’s wife, certain lands should be sold, and the money divided among children; but the Will did not declar
Commonwealth v. Chambre
*SEPTEMBER TERM, 1794. Commonwealth v. Chambre. Computation of time. The computation of time must be by calendar months, in the exception (in the 10th section of the act of 1780, for the gradual abolition of slavery) of domestic slaves atte
Boyd's Lessee v. Cowan
* APRIL TERM, 1794. Boyd’s Lessee v. Cowan. Ejectment. — Mesne profits. The mesne profits can be recovered in an ejectment, by way of a amagce. Ejectment, tried at West Chester, in Chester county, on the- 22d of October 1793. The jury gave
Brudenell v. Vaux
April Term, 1794 Prefent Wilson and Peters, Justices Brudenell et al. versus Vaux et al. Lewis is’ Tilghman, for the plaintiff. Ingerfoll, Rawle, & Thomas, for the defendant.
Georgia v. Brailsford
February Term, 1794. ON the meeting of the Court, a commission was read, dated the 28th of January, 1794, appointing William Bradford, Esquire, Attorney-General of the United States The State of Georgia, versus Brailsford, et al. THIS cause
McEwen v. Gibbs
*McEwen v. Gibbs et al. Witness. Plaintiff, a certificated bankrupt, was admitted to prove a parol acceptance of a bill of exchange, the foundation of the action, after he had released hia interest at the bar, his assignees having previousl
Schenkhouse v. Gibbs
JANUARY TERM, 1794. Schenkhouse v. Gibbs et al. Factors. — General amerage. If a factor is employed by several foreign merchants, unconnected with each other, he may remit by a general bill, payable to one, with separate drafts on him, in f
Glass v. The Sloop Betsey
Glass, et al. Appellants, versus The Sloop Betsey, et al. 1794. CAPTAIN Pierre frc~de 7ohannene~ the comifiander of a French privateer, called the Citizen Genet, ha.viiig cap- tured as prize, on the high feas, the flo6p Betfey, lent the vei
Ingraham v. Gibbs
Ingraham versus Gibbs.
Vance v. Fairis
January Term, 1794. Vance, surviving partner, versus Fairis. ON the trial of this cause, the plaintiff who was surviving partner of a Commercial House established in Dominica, offered, in evidence, a copy of entries in original books of the
Eddowes v. Niell
Eddowes et al. v. Thomas Niell. Letter of credit. — Presumption of payment. Id order to render a letter of credit obligatory, it is not necessary, that it should be answered. A lapse of nineteen years, without notice of a default in payment
Zantzinger v. Ketch
Zantzinger v. Ketch. Parol evidence. Parol evidence was admitted to explain the meaning of the words “ the deed of conveyance ” in articles of agreement, as meaning a deed conveying the land, free from all incumbrances. This was an action o
Edgar's Lessee v. Robinson
*Edgar’s Lessee v. James Robinson, Jr., and William Robinson. JPa/rol evidence. Parol evidence of a deed is admissible, without a notice to produce it, as against one, not a party to the deed; nor can he be compelled to produce it, if he is
Conrad v. Conrad
Jacob Conrad v. Conrad et al., Administrators of G. Conrad. Assumpsit for work and services. Where an illegitimate son works for his father, on an express promise, that he should be put on a footing with the legitimate children, he may reco
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.