Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Browse Every Case
313,007 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Musgrove v. Gibbs
Musgrove, qui tam, v. Gibbs. Usury.— Variance. [f a borrower give his promissory note for more than the sum loaned and legal interest, and make a partial payment, giving a new note for the balance, the offence of usury is complete; so, if h
Pollard v. Shaffer
SEPTEMBER TERM, 1787. Pollard v. Shaffer. Covenant. A covenant to repair, and to deliver up the demised premises in good order and repair, run3 with the land, and binds the assignee, although he were not named by express words. The lessee o
January v. Goodman
January, assignee, v. Goodman. Specialty. — Evidence. An instrument, by which the defendant promised and obliged himself and his heirs to pay to the pla ntifE and his assigns, concluding with the words, “ as witness my hand and seal,” and a
Phile v. The Ship Anna
Phile, qui tam, v. The Ship Anna. Forfeiture of vessel. Under the act of assembly of 1787, a vessel was liable to forfeiture, in case goods were unladen from her, before due entry, whether the owners were privy to the transaction, or otherw
Shoemaker v. Knorr
*Shoemaker v. Knorr. • Amendment. The teste and return of an alias venditioni exponas were allowed to be amended by the praecipe. Judgment : fi.fa. returned, and vend. exp. to Dec. term 1786, returned by the sheriff, “ proceedings stayed by
Gerard v. La Coste
JUNE TERM, 1787. Gerard v. La Coste et al. Bills of exchange. A biE of exchange payable to A., without the words “ or order,” or other words of negotiability, is not indorsable over, so as to enable the indorsee to maintain an action agains
Lake v. Hulbert
May Sessions, 1787. Lake, &c. versus, Hulbert, et al. THIS case now came before the Court, on a petition, that the appeal should be sustained: but GRIFFIN, READ, and LOWELL, Commissioners, rejected the application in the following terms.
Cockshot's Lessee v. Hopkins
April Term, 1787. Cockshot’s Lessee versus Hopkins. EJECTMENT. The demise laid in the declaration having expired, during the pendency of the action, Coulthurst, moved for leave to amend by inserting the word twenty, instead of seven, so as
Gregory's Lessee v. Setter
JANUARY TERM, 1787. Gregory’s Lessee v. Setter. Evidence. Evidence admitted of declarations by a grantee, after the execution of the deed, that the.purchase was made partly with the money of another. Ejectment for a house and lot. The plain
James v. Allen
James et al. v. Allen. Insol/vency. A discharge of the defendant from imprisonment in New Jersey, by virtue of the general insolvent law of that state, was held not to entitle him to a similar discharge in this state, although the debt was
Innes v. Miller
*Innes v. Miller. Award. it is not sufficient cause for setting aside a report, that the referees, after settling the principles of the report, asked the plaintiff if he would agree that a quarter’s rent which had accrued after the action b
Chaplin v. Kirwan
SEPTEMBER TERM, 1786. Chaplin v. Kirwan. Arbitrators. Referees have no right to examine a witness exporte. The referees in this case had allowed ex parte evidence to be given, of the current price of coachmakors’ work, at the time when the
Purviance v. Angus
SEPTEMBER SESSIONS, 1786. Purviance et al. v. Angus. Master of vessel. The master of a vessel is liable to his owners in damages, where they have been compelled to pay damages to a third person, for injury sustained by him from the miscondu
Lee v. Biddis
Lee v. Biddis. Pa/rol evidence. Effect of the words “current lawful money.” Parol evidence to show what kind of money was meant, ruled to be inadmissible. On the trial of this cause, Lewis, for the plaintiff, offered evidence to prove what
Grier v. Grier
SEPTEMBER TERM, 1786. Grier et al. v. Grier. Award. An award, that the defendant pay a certain sum to the executors of A., is sufficiently certain; aa it may be averred that the plaintiffs are the executors. After argument by Bradford and S
Shotwell v. Boehm
Shotwell v. Boehm. Mesne profits. Trespass for mesne profits, after recovery in ejectment. Rawle, for the plaintiff. Sergeant, for the defendant.
Dutilh v. Ritchie
JUNE TERM, 1786. Dutilh v. Ritchie. Title to chattels. Wbat is such delivery, as will pass the title to goods, as against the vendor’s assignee, for the benefit of creditors. This was a replevin for divers goods, wares, &c., and property wa
Andrew's Lessee v. Fleming
May Sessions, 1786. Andrew’s Lessee, versus Fleming. EJECTMENT. In the course of the trial of this cause, the following points were ruled. 1. The plaintiff offered to give evidence of a conversation between Thomas Fleming, the husband of th
Kunckel v. Baker
Kunckel et al. v. Baker. Practice. — Special cowrts. A special court will not be ordered, on the ground, that one of the plaintiffs has assigned al his interest to the other, and that the latter is about to depart from the country. This, wa
Pirate v. Dalby
*Pirate, alias Belt, v. Dalby. Slaves. The civil law rule, partus sequitur ventrem, is the law of this country, in regard to domestic slavery. Since the act for the gradual abolition of slavery, a number of persons have formed a society in
Sliver v. Shelback
APRIL TERM, 1786. Sliver, Plaintiff in error, v. Shelback. Infancy. The appearance of an infant to a suit brought against him, is not a judicial act, but will be reversed on error, after he attains the age of twenty-one. This was a question
Marriot v. Davey
Marriot et ux v. Davey et al., Executors. Action for legacy. A settlement of an administration account by referees, on a citation before tbe register, held not to be conclusive, in an action for a legacy. This was an action brought by a res
Ogden v. Ash
Ogden v. Ash. Marine insurance. A policy of insurance warranted, that “ orders will be given that the ship shall not cruise held, that it was necessary that express orders should be given to this effect, and that it was not sufficient, that
Hollingsworth v. Leiper
*MARCH TERM, 1786. Hollingsworth v. Leiper. Arbitrators. It is not a valid exception to a report of referees, that they heard a witness interested in the event. A Rule had been obtained, to show cause why the report of referees should not b
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.