Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Browse Every Case
313,007 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McDill's Lessee v. McDill
APRIL TERM, 1782. McDill’s Lessee v. McDill. Deed as evidence. A deed with an ink seal, attested by one witness only, and proved by him before a justice, with out having been recorded, admitted in evidence. A Deed executed by two persons, w
Keane v. The Brig Gloucester
Keane, et. al. Libellants and Appellants, versus The Brig Gloucester, et al. Appellees. THIS was an appeal from the Admiralty of Pennsylvania, and after argument, PACA and GRIFFIN, the presiding Commissioners, delivered the following senten
Darby v. The Brig Erstern
January Sessions, 1782. Darby, et. al. Appellants, versus The Brig Erstern, et al. THIS was an appeal from the Admiralty of the State of Massachusetts-bay, where the Brig and her cargo had been acquitted. The case was argued on the 28th, 29
Miller v. The Ship Resolution
December Session, 1781. Miller, Libellant and Appellant, versus The Ship Resolution, &c. The Same, versus The Cargo of the Ship Resolution, &c. On motion of Wilson, for the Appellants, a rule had been granted in September Session last, to s
Respublica v. Weidle
November Session, 1781. Respublica versus Weidle. THIS was an indictment for misprision of Treason, in the defendant’s speaking the following words—“ that he had lived six years in London, and nine years in Ireland; and never lived happier
Rapp v. Le Blanc
* Rapp v. Le Blanc et al. Evidence. — Costs. Lewis, for the claimants. Blair, for the informer.
McVeaugh v. Goods
*McVeaugh v. Goods. Competency of witness. On the trial of an information against certain goods illegally imported, a witness, who assisted in making the seizure, and who stated on his voir dire that he expected some compensation from the g
Respublica v. Buffington
SEPTEMBER TERM, 1781. Respublica v. Joshua Buffington. Outlawry. Where A. B., of West Bradford, was required to surrender himself by the name of A. B. of East Bradford,” &e., the variance was held to be fatal. The Attorney-General filed a s
Miller v. The Ship Resolution
August Session 1781. Miller et. al. Libellants and Appellants, versus The Ship Resolution, and Ingersoll, Claimant and Appellee. Miller et. al. Libellants and Appellants, versus The Cargo of the Ship Resolution, and O’Brien Claimant and App
Respublica v. M'Carty
April Term, 1781. Respublica versus M'Carty. THE defendant was indicted for High-Treason, in levying war, &c. by joining the armies of the King of Great Britain. On the trial, the Attorney General offered to give the confession of the party
Respublica v. Chapman
* Respublica v. Samuel Chapman. Treason. High treason might have been committed against the commonwealth of Pennsylvania, previous te the meeting of the supreme executive council, in March 1777; .but under the act of 28th of January 1777, i
Claim of Jacobs v. Adams
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. APRIL TERM, 1781. The Claim of Jacobs v. Adams, Executor. Interest. Interest is not recoverable, where money has been received and paid in a mistake, and neithei fraud nor surprise is imputed to either party.
Montgomery v. Henry
HIGH COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF PENNSYLVANIA APRIL SESSIONS, 1780. Montgomery v. Henry et al. Admiralty. — Powers of ship-owners. Upon a general retainer of a vessel for no particular voyage, the owner may dismiss the master at any time
Respublica v. Powell
*APRIL TERM, 1780. Respublica v. Powell. Cheating by false tokens. It íb an indictable offence in a public officer, to impose false marks on stores provided for the army of the United States, whereby the public is injured. This was an indic
Respublica v. Sweers
SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA. APRIL TERM, 1779. Respublica v. Cornelius Sweers. Indictment for fraud. Fhe United States became a body corporate from the period of their association. An indictment may be maintained for a cheat of such a nat
Respublica v. Roberts
*Respublica v. John Roberts. Evidence in treason. Under the act of 1 MV, there must be an actual enlistment of the person persuaded, to constitute the oifence of treason. Although the defendant’s confession, proved by two witnesses, is not
Respublica v. Carlisle
Respublica v. Abraham Carlisle. Indictment for treason. Indictment for treason: The overt act laid was taking a commission from the enemy: evidence was admitted to show that the defendant had a power of granting passes into, and out of, the
Respublica v. Malin
Respublica v. Malin. Treason. Where the defendant had joined a corps of American troops, supposing them to be British, it was held, that evidence of words spoken by him to prove this mistake, and to show his real intention of joining and ad
Respublica v. Molder
COURT OF OYER AND TERMINER, AT PHILADELPHIA. SEPTEMBER SESSIONS, 1778. Before McKean, Chief Justice, Atlee and Evans, Justices. Respublica v. Molder et al. Trials for treason. After full argument by Wilson, Moss and Mewis, counsel for Joshu
Keppele v. Williams
Keppele v. Williams. Practice. — Continuance. It is a contempt, to pocket the venire. A Venire had issued, and the jury was summoned: the plaintiff forbade the sheriff to bring the jury to the court. On the day of trial, the plaintiff’s att
Township of Fallowfield v. Township of Marlborough
Township of Fallowfield v. Township of Marlborough. Poor. — Order of removal. It is not necessary that it should appear on the face of an order of removal, that there was an examination of the pauper, or of any other person. On certiorari t
Wheeler v. Hughes
Wheeler, Assignee of Baynton, v. Hughes, Executor. Defalcation. The assignee of a bond takes it at his own peril, and stands in the place of the obligee, so as to let in every defalcation which the obligor had against the obligee, at the ti
Steiner v. Fell
* APRIL TERM, 1776. Before Chew, Chief Justice, and Lawrence, Justice. Steiner v. Fell and others. Removal of cause. When the defendant takes out a habeas corpus to remove the cause, and the plaintiff subsequently procures the allowance of
Anonymous
Bucks Nisi Prius, Oct. 15, 1773. Anonymous. Descent. Land demised to a child, who dies intestate, is to be distributed according to the intestate law. John Fisher, having two sons and a daughter, made his will, and devised a plantation to h
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.