Atty. Alexandra O. Freeman
Alexandra is a member of the Professional Liability Department where she focuses her practice in the areas of education law and employment law. In 2022, Alex received her juris doctor from Temple University Beasley School of Law where she was a member of the Veteran Law Group and the President of the Student Animal Legal Defense Fund.
Profile Summary
About Alexandra O. Freeman at a glance
Alexandra O. Freeman is an Associate based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, practicing at Marshall Dennehey. They have 4+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 2022. Their practice focuses on employment and education. Admitted to practice in Pennsylvania (2022), New Jersey (2023), and U.S. District Court Eastern District of Pennsylvania (2023). Educated at Temple University Beasley School of Law (J.D., 2022) and United States Naval Academy (B.S., 2014). Serands clients in Philadelphia, PA and the surrounding metropolitan area.
Want to Get Service From This Attorney?
Sign up free and choose one of the two methods below.
Have a legal question? Sign up free, submit it through the Ask the Attorney module and receive a focused answer from a specialist.
- Free to ask a question
- Answers from specialist attorneys
- Optional private / anonymous question
Request an online video meeting or an in-person consultation at the attorney's office. Pick a time that works for you and share the details securely.
- Online video meeting
- In-person at the attorney's office
- Secure messaging and payment
About
- Alexandra is a member of the Professional Liability Department where she focuses her practice in the areas of education law and employment law
- In 2022, Alex received her juris doctor from Temple University Beasley School of Law where she was a member of the Veteran Law Group and the President of the Student Animal Legal Defense Fund
- Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Alex worked as an Assistant District Attorney at the Philadelphia District Attorney’s Office for the Municipal Court Unit and the Economic Crimes Unit
- Alex graduated from the United States Naval Academy in 2014 and commissioned as a Naval Officer
- She served as a Surface Warfare Officer for five years
- She was stationed in Japan for two years and then in Virginia for three years before departing the Navy to attend law school
- Honors & Awards •Pennsylvania Super Lawyers Rising Star (2025-2026) Published Works •'The EEOC's Litigation Under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act,' The Legal Intelligencer, November 8, 2024 Results Defense Verdict Obtained in Two Consolidated Matters Following a Five-Day Trial We obtained a defense verdict in two consolidated matters in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania following a five-day trial before Judge Gallagher
- The first plaintiff alleged he was terminated in retaliation for filing a lawsuit and that he was subjected to racial discrimination during his employment
- The second plaintiff alleged he was terminated in retaliation for supporting the wage and hour claims of the first plaintiff
- After deliberating for approximately two hours, the jury answered “no” on the five theories asserted by the plaintiffs
- Thought Leadership The EEOC's Litigation Under the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act November 8, 2024 Since the law went into effect, the EEOC has reported that it has received more than 2,000 charges alleging violation of the PWFA
- In addition, the EEOC has recently filed several lawsuits against employers who have allegedly violated the PWFA, which provides accommodations for pregnant, and postpartum, applicants and employees
- Defense Digest Student Athlete or Employee?
- The Ball Is Still Up in the Air September 1, 2024 Key Points:College athletes are not precluded from bringing FLSA claims as “employees.” Courts could find that college athletes are employees under the FLSA under the Third Circuit’s new test
- Colleges could reduce or eliminate their athletic programs due to financial burden.Following the Third Circuit’s ruling in Johnson v
- National Collegiate Athletic Association, 2024 WL 3367646 (3d
- Cir
- July 11, 2024), despite their decades’ long standing as “student athletes,” Division I college athletes may now-under certain circumstances-be considered college employees and may be subject to the federal wage and hour laws
- Specifically, the court in Johnson determined that Division I college athletes are not barred from bringing suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), which mandates that “employees” receive minimum wages and non-exempt employees are paid overtime for more than 40 hours worked during a workweek
- As a result, courts may find that they are considered employees under the FLSA, and, therefore, that these student athletes (numbering approximately 190,000) would be entitled to compensation in the form of minimum wages, overtime pay, and other rights for their participation in intercollegiate athletic programs
- In 2019, Ralph Johnson and five other former and current Division I college athletes filed suit against the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and 13 Division I colleges (as representatives of a defendant class of all private and semi-public NCAA Division I member schools)
- Mr. Johnson and his fellow plaintiffs filed suit for unpaid wages under FLSA and various state wage and hours, arguing that their participation in Division I intercollegiate athletics should be compensated because they were, in fact, “employees,” as defined under the applicable laws
- Following the filing of the lawsuit in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, the NCAA and the colleges moved to dismiss the claims, but the court ultimately denied the motion
- The court did, however, certify the matter for an interlocutory appeal, and the Third Circuit Court of Appeals accepted the appeal
- Ultimately, the Third Circuit’s review was to determine “whether college athletes, by nature of their so-called amateur status, are precluded from ever bringing an FLSA claim.” The Third Circuit concluded that their “answer to this question is no.” This, however, means that, while the Third Circuit did not decide whether college athletes are employees under the FLSA, colleges athletes could be considered employees
- This decision is a departure from the rulings in the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, which in 2016 and 2019 had determined that student athletes are not able to bring suit under the FLSA
- In so holding, the Third Circuit went through the history of intercollegiate sports, beginning with the first intercollegiate competition-a rowing competition held between Harvard and Yale in 1852
- Interestingly, this competition was not proposed by either school
- Rather, it was the superintendent of a railroad who suggested the race, motivated by his financial interest to increase ridership on his railroad by transporting spectators to and from the race
- The financial motivation behind college athletics has only grown since its inception, with the Third Circuit noting that, today, some colleges and universities make millions of dollars in revenue from their sports teams (mainly from their football and/or basketball programs) each year
- In concluding that college athletes may ultimately be deemed employees under the FLSA, the Third Circuit remanded the case back to the trial court with the direction to apply “an economic realities analysis grounded in common-law agency principles.” The district court had previously applied the seven-factor test from Glatt v
- Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., 811 F.3d 528 (2d Cir. 2016) (determining that unpaid interns should not be classified as employees)
- However, in rejecting this test, the Third Circuit reasoned that “the Glatt test has limited relevance to athletes because it compares the benefits that an intern might receive at an internship with the training received at the intern’s formal education program
- In comparison, interscholastic athletics are not part of any academic curriculum.” The Third Circuit, instead, fashioned a new test, deciding that “college athletes may be employees when they (a) perform services for another party, (b) ‘necessarily and primarily for the [other party’s] benefit,’ (c) under that party’s control or right of control, and (d) in return for ‘express’ or ‘implied’ compensation or ‘in-kind benefits.’” Therefore, in analyzing any of these claims, these are the elements which must be evaluated by the lower court to determine if an athlete is an employee, which will be the subject of significant discovery as the case proceeds in order to make a record for summary judgment
- This ruling may have a huge impact on NCAA-affiliated colleges across the country, which may now find themselves defending against student athlete claims under the FLSA and state wage and hour laws
- In departing from the rulings of the Seventh and Ninth Circuits, the Third Circuit has potentially opened the door for new suits to be filed across the country
- Additionally, not all sports, nor all schools, generate the million-dollar revenues mentioned by the Third Circuit
- While the court references the revenue brought in by large football and basketball programs, college athletic programs consist of more than just the football and basketball programs and players
- Though some schools may benefit financially from a couple of their athletic teams, the majority of sports programs cost more than they bring in
- Adding the payment of wages to already existing costs of athletic programs may prove prohibitive for some, or many, schools
- The full impact of this decision is still unclear, but, ultimately, schools may find themselves defending lawsuits, eliminating athletic scholarships, cutting less financially lucrative sports teams, or getting rid of their athletic programs entirely in order to manage their finances
- Alex is an associate in our Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, office
- Defense Digest, Vol. 30, No. 3, September 2024, is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent legal developments of interest to our readers
- This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship
- ATTORNEY ADVERTISING pursuant to New York RPC 7.1. 2024 Marshall Dennehey
- All Rights Reserved
- This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm
- For reprints, contact tamontemuro@mdwcg.com
- News Marshall Dennehey Announces 2026 Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars Honorees May 22, 2026 Marshall Dennehey Announces 2025 Pennsylvania Super Lawyers and Rising Stars May 22, 2025
Practice Areas Explained
Alexandra O. Freeman's Areas of Practice
Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Alexandra O. Freeman handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.
Employment lawyers represent workers in wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, wage & hour disputes, and severance negotiations.
Alexandra O. Freeman is one of 169,120 employment attorneys indexed nationally. Browse employment attorneys in Pennsylvania →
Education attorneys for special education (IEP), school discipline, Title IX, and student rights.
Alexandra O. Freeman is one of 24,079 education attorneys indexed nationally. Browse education attorneys in Pennsylvania →
Jurisdictional Context
Why local counsel matters in Pennsylvania
Practicing law in Pennsylvania. Legal matters in Pennsylvania are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Philadelphia are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Pennsylvania state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Pennsylvania brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Pennsylvania courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.
Looking for additional Pennsylvania attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Philadelphia or all attorneys in Pennsylvania.
Frequently Asked
Common questions about Alexandra O. Freeman
Where is Alexandra O. Freeman's law office located?
What practice areas does Alexandra O. Freeman handle?
How long has Alexandra O. Freeman practiced law?
Where did Alexandra O. Freeman go to law school?
How can I contact Alexandra O. Freeman for a consultation?
Practice Areas
Education
Bar Admissions
Reviews
No reviews yet.