Atty. Charles L. Sutter

Atty. Charles L. Sutter

As a member of the Casualty Department, Charles serves as an associate attorney defending high-exposure cases involving commercial and personal automobile liability, general liability, premises liability, and products liability. Prior to joining the firm, Charles managed a diverse national and international caseload focused on product liability subrogation and personal injury claims, representing insurance carriers and their insureds-including foreign manufacturers, distributors, and retailers-in both federal and state courts across the United States, Canada, and Europe.

Purchase Purchase 5 yrs experience 5 year
Call (914) 977-7329 Book Appointment

Automobile Liability & More Attorney · Serving Purchase, NY · 5+ Years Experience

Profile Summary

About Charles L. Sutter at a Glance

Charles L. Sutter is an Associate based in Purchase, New York, practicing at Marshall Dennehey. They have 5+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 2021. Their practice focuses on medical malpractice and product liability. Admitted to practice in New York (2021). Educated at Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (J.D., 2020) and Drew University (B.A., 2016). Serves clients in Purchase, NY and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated October 2026

About Charles L. Sutter

  • As a member of the Casualty Department, Charles serves as an associate attorney defending high-exposure cases involving commercial and personal automobile liability, general liability, premises liability, and products liability
  • Prior to joining the firm, Charles managed a diverse national and international caseload focused on product liability subrogation and personal injury claims, representing insurance carriers and their insureds-including foreign manufacturers, distributors, and retailers-in both federal and state courts across the United States, Canada, and Europe
  • His work encompassed all phases of litigation and pre-litigation, including coordinating expert investigations across multiple disciplines, managing local counsel, and providing strategic legal and indemnification analysis
  • He was also responsible for developing defense and resolution strategies, preparing client reports, negotiating multi-case retention agreements with experts and consultants, and resolving matters through complex settlements
  • Earlier in his career, Charles litigated complex commercial and contract disputes and also managed a high volume of business immigration matters, including both immigrant and non-immigrant visa cases
  • Charles received his juris doctor from the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, where he was named to the Dean’s List and served on the Hofstra Law Review
  • He earned his undergraduate degree in Political Science, magna cum laude, from Drew University
  • He is admitted to practice in the state of New York
  • Honors & Awards New York Metro Super Lawyers Rising Star (2026) Thought Leadership Case Law Alerts Supreme Court Addresses Conflicts Between Federal and State Law Regarding Negligent Hiring Claims Against Freight Brokers April 1, 2026 This case arises from a collision on an Illinois highway between a motorist and a tractor-trailer operated by a driver employed by the defendant, Caribe
  • The plaintiff brought suit, alleging a variety of claims, including negligent hiring and vicarious liability
  • However, rather than limit the application of negligent hiring to Caribe, the plaintiff attempted to extend this argument to the defendant freight broker, C.H
  • Robinson Worldwide by arguing that Robinson had negligently selected Caribe as the freight carrier.Robinson moved to dismiss the negligent hiring claims pursuant to Section 14510(c)(1) of the Federal Aviation Administration Authorization Act of 1994, as the language of that statute prohibits state suits against brokers “relat[ing] to a price, route, or service” and “with respect to the transportation of property”
  • The District Court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, stating that the safety exception of Section 14501(c)(2)(A) permitted such claims, as it preserves “safety regulatory authority of a State with respect to motor vehicles.” On appeal, the U.S
  • Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled in favor of defendant Robinson, ruling that “the FAAAA preempts state law claims that a freight broker negligently hiring a motor carrier.”Given that a conflict presently exists between rulings on this issue from the U.S
  • Court of Appeals for the Sixth and Ninth Circuits and the U.S
  • Court of Appeals for the Seventh and Eleventh Circuits, the Supreme Court granted certiorari on October 3, 2025.The Supreme Court heard oral argument on March 6, 2026, and has yet to issue a decision
  • Case Law Alerts Texas Supreme Court to Determine if a Shipper Owes a Duty to a Third-Party Motorist Injured by a Freight Carrier April 1, 2026 This case arises from an accident in which a driver hired by a freight carrier ran a red light and fatally struck a motorcyclist
  • The decedent’s parents sued both the freight carrier and the shipper, Home Depot, alleging negligence, negligence per se, and gross negligence
  • The carrier accepted vicarious liability given the driver was acting within the scope of his employment
  • Home Depot moved to dismiss the plaintiffs’ claims as baseless, given they did not owe a duty to a third-party motorist for the actions of a freight carrier’s drivers
  • The Texas trial court denied the motion, and the court of appeals denied Home Depot’s mandamus petition.However, the Texas Supreme Court granted Home Depot’s petition for a writ of mandamus
  • Home Depot again argued that it did not have a duty to a third-party motorist in the event of negligent actions by the freight carrier’s driver
  • Home Depot further argued that Texas does not recognize negligent hiring as a valid cause of action for an independent contractor, claiming the plaintiffs failed to adequately allege that Home Depot’s hiring of the freight carrier proximately caused the accident
  • Home Depot argued that the court should adopt and apply a rule that would absolve an employer of liability for a derivative claim if the employer accepts vicarious liability.The Texas Supreme Court held oral arguments on March 4, 2026, and has yet to issue a decision
  • News Marshall Dennehey Announces 2026 New York Metro Super Lawyers and Rising Stars April 27, 2026

Practice Areas Explained

Charles L. Sutter's Areas of Legal Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Charles L. Sutter handles, with a practical overview of what that area of law involves and how it may apply to your situation in Purchase.

Medical Malpractice in Purchase

Medical malpractice lawyers represent patients harmed by negligent doctors, hospitals, and other providers. Free case review, no fee unless you win.

Charles L. Sutter is one of 48,593 medical malpractice attorneys indexed nationally. Browse medical malpractice attorneys in New York →

Product Liability in Purchase

Charles L. Sutter is one of 65,610 product liability attorneys indexed nationally. Browse product liability attorneys in New York →

Jurisdictional Context

Why Local Counsel Matters in Purchase

Practicing law in New York. Legal matters in New York are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Purchase are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate New York state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in New York brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this venue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in New York courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Purchase Courts and Legal Process

Choosing a Purchase-based attorney means your counsel already knows the local docketing timelines, preferred filing formats, and how individual judges typically rule on procedural motions — details that only come from practicing in this jurisdiction day after day. That local familiarity can translate to better strategy, faster filings, and fewer costly surprises.

Looking for additional New York attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Purchase or all attorneys in New York.

Frequently Asked

Common Questions About Charles L. Sutter

Where is Charles L. Sutter's law office located?
Charles L. Sutter's law practice is located in Purchase, New York. The firm is Marshall Dennehey. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Charles L. Sutter handle?
Charles L. Sutter focuses on medical malpractice, product liability. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in New York.
How long has Charles L. Sutter practiced law?
Charles L. Sutter has 5+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 2021.
Where did Charles L. Sutter go to law school?
Charles L. Sutter earned their education at (J.D., 2020); (B.A., 2016).
How can I contact Charles L. Sutter for a consultation?
You can contact Charles L. Sutter directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.

Professional Profile

Why Clients in Purchase Choose Charles L. Sutter

Selecting an attorney is one of the most consequential decisions you can make when a legal matter arises. Below are the core qualities that distinguish Charles L. Sutter's practice in the field of medical malpractice and product liability.

5+ Years of Legal Practice

With 5 years in the profession, Charles L. Sutter has developed the procedural fluency and courtroom instincts that come from handling real cases under real deadlines.

Broad Practice Area Coverage

Covering medical malpractice and product liability, Charles L. Sutter can address the full spectrum of a client's legal needs without requiring referrals to separate specialists for each issue.

Local Presence in Purchase

A Purchase-based practice means Charles L. Sutter attends hearings in the same courthouses, knows the local clerks, and understands the unwritten scheduling norms that affect every case filed here.

Case Types

Common Legal Issues Charles L. Sutter Handles in Purchase

Below is a representative sample of the types of matters Charles L. Sutter has experience with under New York law. If your situation involves one of these case categories, this attorney may be well positioned to help you understand your options.

Surgical error claims
Medical Malpractice
Misdiagnosis and delayed diagnosis
Medical Malpractice
Birth injury lawsuits
Medical Malpractice
Hospital negligence
Medical Malpractice

This list is illustrative, not exhaustive. Contact Charles L. Sutter directly to discuss the specifics of your situation.

Search Reference

How People Find Charles L. Sutter Online

Prospective clients searching for legal help in Purchase commonly use a combination of the attorney's name and their specific legal need. The following search terms frequently lead people to this profile and to attorneys like Charles L. Sutter.

Charles L. Sutter attorney Charles L. Sutter lawyer Charles L. Sutter Purchase Charles L. Sutter New York Charles L. Sutter reviews Charles L. Sutter contact Marshall Dennehey law firm medical malpractice attorney in Purchase medical malpractice lawyer Purchase best medical malpractice attorney Purchase top rated medical malpractice lawyer near me medical malpractice attorney New York find a lawyer near me how to hire an attorney

If any of the above matches what you searched for, you've found the right profile. Use the contact options at the top of this page to get in touch with Charles L. Sutter directly.

Education & Law School Background

J.D.
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
- 2020
B.A.
Drew University
- 2016

Bar Admissions & Licensed Jurisdictions

New York
Admitted: 2021

Client Reviews & Ratings — Charles L. Sutter

These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.