Atty. Christopher Francis Moriarty

Atty. Christopher Francis Moriarty

Christopher Moriarty litigates securities fraud and other complex litigation in the United States and consults institutional investors on opportunities to seek recovery in securities-related actions. His securities fraud class action practice encompasses every aspect of litigation, from case-starting to settlement.

Call (843) 216-9245 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Christopher Francis Moriarty at a glance

Christopher Francis Moriarty is a Member based in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, practicing at Motley Rice Llc. Their practice focuses on class action and whistleblower. Educated at Duke University School of Law (J.D., 2011) and Trinity College, University of Cambridge (B.A. Trinity, 2003). Active member of Associations •South Carolina Association for Justice •American Bar Association •South Carolina Bar Association •Charleston County Bar Association. Serands clients in Mount Pleasant, SC and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

  • Christopher Moriarty litigates securities fraud and other complex litigation in the United States and consults institutional investors on opportunities to seek recovery in securities-related actions
  • His securities fraud class action practice encompasses every aspect of litigation, from case-starting to settlement
  • Notable securities fraud class actions in which he served as part of the lead counsel team include: In re Twitter Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 16-cv-05314-JST (N.D
  • Cal.) ($809.5 million recovery*)
  • In re Barrick Gold Securities Litigation, No. 13-cv-03851 (S.D.N.Y.) ($140 million recovery*)
  • City of Brockton Retirement System v
  • Avon Products, Inc., 11 Civ. 4655 (PGG) (S.D.N.Y.) ($62 million recovery*)
  • Hill v
  • State Street Corp., No. 09-cv-12136-GAO (D
  • Mass.) ($60 million recovery*)
  • In re Hewlett-Packard Co. Securities Litigation, No. 11-cv-1404 (RNBx) (C.D
  • Cal.) ($57 million recovery*)
  • KBC Asset Management NV v. 3D Systems Corp., No. 15-cv-02393-MGL (D.S.C.) ($50 million recovery*)
  • In re Medtronic, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 0:13-cv-0168 (D
  • Minn.) ($43 million recovery*)
  • Forsta AP-Fonden and Danske Invest Management A/S v
  • St. Jude Medical, Inc., Civil No. 12-3070 (JNE/HB) (D
  • Minn.) ($39.25 million recovery*)
  • Ross v
  • Career Education Corp., No. 12-cv-00276 (N.D
  • Ill.) ($27.5 million recovery*)
  • and KBC Asset Management NV v
  • Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. 14-cv-10105-MLW (D
  • Mass.) ($22.25 million recovery*)
  • Christopher has also represented investors in direct actions under federal securities laws, in shareholder derivative litigation, and in antitrust class actions
  • whistleblowers in proceedings before the U.S
  • Securities and Exchange Commission
  • and relators in qui tam litigation
  • In the international context, Christopher serves as U.S. counsel to the Stichting Petrobras Compensation Foundation in the Netherlands, which represents the interests of investors who traded in Petrobras securities outside the United States and who suffered losses as a result of an alleged long-running fraud and bribery scheme perpetrated by Petrobras and certain of its related entities and former executives
  • In addition to his securities practice, Christopher represents dozens of governmental entities in litigation against several pharmaceutical drug manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies in connection with the opioid epidemic
  • As part of that, he served as one of Washington State’s litigation and trial counsel in its action against the “Big Three” distributors of prescription opioids that resulted in a $518 million settlement after trial
  • He also successfully briefed and argued the oppositions to numerous motions to dismiss in the State of Alaska’s action against numerous opioid manufacturers.* As part of his pro bono practice, Christopher has drafted amicus curiae briefs in approximately 20 constitutional law cases before the U.S
  • Supreme Court (which has cited his work) and the federal courts of appeal
  • Outside of his legal practice, Christopher serves on the Board of Directors of Operation Sight, a non-profit that provides free cataract surgery and other services to those in need
  • Christopher was called to the Bar in England and Wales by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple in 2008. * Please remember that every case is different
  • Any result we achieve for one client in one matter does not necessarily indicate similar results can be obtained for other clients

SELECT PUBLICATIONS

Christopher F. Moriarty, Supreme Court Rules That Securities Act Time Bar Is Not Subject to American Pipe Tolling, Class Action & Derivative Suits Newsletter, American Bar Association (Oct. 3, 2017) SELECT PRESENTATIONS: Panelist, Experts: Communicating Complex Ideas and Issues in Litigation Consistent with Messaging Trends, American Bar Association Litigation Section Annual Conference (May 6, 2022) Awards, Accolades & Recognitions Super Lawyers 2016-2021 South Carolina Super Lawyers Rising Stars list Securities litigation Blog Posts February 9, 2026 The impact of product recalls on shareholder wealth Causes, Not Just Cases by: Christopher Moriarty October 4, 2017 Supreme Court ruling threatens investors’ potential ability to recover in securities fraud class actions Causes, Not Just Cases by: Christopher Moriarty News April 28, 2025 The history and legacy of Workers’ Memorial Day by: M. Nolan Webb July 2, 2024 Motley Rice litigation teams and attorneys claim honors in four different legal awards by: Motley Rice

Practice Areas Explained

Christopher Francis Moriarty's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Christopher Francis Moriarty handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Class Action

Christopher Francis Moriarty is one of 26,424 class action attorneys indexed nationally. Browse class action attorneys in South Carolina →

Whistleblower & Retaliation

Christopher Francis Moriarty is one of 3,552 whistleblower attorneys indexed nationally. Browse whistleblower attorneys in South Carolina →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in South Carolina

Practicing law in South Carolina. Legal matters in South Carolina are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Mount Pleasant are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate South Carolina state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in South Carolina brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in South Carolina courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional South Carolina attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Mount Pleasant or all attorneys in South Carolina.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Christopher Francis Moriarty

Where is Christopher Francis Moriarty's law office located?
Christopher Francis Moriarty's law practice is located in Mount Pleasant, South Carolina. The firm is Motley Rice Llc. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Christopher Francis Moriarty handle?
Christopher Francis Moriarty focuses on class action, whistleblower. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in South Carolina.
Where did Christopher Francis Moriarty go to law school?
Christopher Francis Moriarty earned their education at (J.D., 2011); (B.A. Trinity, 2003).
How can I contact Christopher Francis Moriarty for a consultation?
You can contact Christopher Francis Moriarty directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.

Education

J.D.
Duke University School of Law
- 2011
B.A. Trinity
Trinity College, University of Cambridge
- 2003

Reviews

These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.