Atty. Christopher J. DiCicco

Atty. Christopher J. DiCicco

Chris is a shareholder in the Casualty Department where he concentrates his practice mostly in the areas of product liability, admiralty and maritime litigation, and aviation litigation. He previously served as Chair of the firm's Executive Committee Advisory Council.

New York New York 15 yrs experience 15 year
Call (856) 675-3606 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Christopher J. DiCicco at a glance

Christopher J. DiCicco is a Shareholder based in New York, New York, practicing at Marshall Dennehey. They have 15+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 2011. Their practice focuses on employment, product liability, litigation, appellate, and maritime. Admitted to practice in New Jersey (2011), U.S. District Court District of New Jersey (2011), New York (2012), and U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York (2012). Educated at Brooklyn Law School (J.D., 2011) and Villanova University (B.A., 2008). Active member of Associations & memberships Aviation Insurance Association Maritime Law Association of the United States. Serands clients in New York, NY and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

  • Chris is a shareholder in the Casualty Department where he concentrates his practice mostly in the areas of product liability, admiralty and maritime litigation, and aviation litigation
  • He previously served as Chair of the firm's Executive Committee Advisory Council
  • In the area of product liability, Chris primarily defends the manufacturers and distributors of tools, automatic doors, machinery, and other heavy industrial equipment
  • As Co-Chair of the Maritime Litigation Practice, Chris handles maritime personal injury defense cases, including recreational boating cases, marine construction cases, cases involving the Jones Act and Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act, and maritime product liability matters
  • He also handles cargo matters, including those involving warehouses and transportation brokers
  • Other maritime experience includes claims involving allisions, collisions, groundings, shipboard fires, and marine insurance disputes
  • As Co-Chair of the Aviation and Complex Litigation Practice, Chris has experience representing airports in aircraft crash cases, as well as representing a flight training provider and one of its pilots
  • He also has experience handling matters on behalf of a major airline, including baggage and ticket disputes, and claims involving travel agencies
  • Through his experiences with these matters, he has gained knowledge about airport operations, flight operations, manufacture of aircraft and engine components, aircraft repair and maintenance, Federal Air Regulations and FAA oversight
  • Chris is also a member of the Aviation Insurance Association, as well as a member of the Insurance Law Global Aviation Subgroup
  • Chris graduated with honors from Villanova University with a bachelor's degree in Political Science
  • He obtained his juris doctor from Brooklyn Law School
  • Chris has been recognized for the last several years as a New York Metro and New Jersey Super Lawyer Rising Star
  • Chris is admitted to practice in New York, New Jersey and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and he actively handles litigation in all of those jurisdictions
  • Honors & Awards •The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, Transportation Law (2023-2024) The Best Lawyers list is issued by Woodward & White
  • A description of the selection methodology can be found here
  • No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. •The Best Lawyers: Ones to Watch, Personal Injury Litigation - Defendants (2024) The Best Lawyers list is issued by Woodward & White
  • A description of the selection methodology can be found here
  • No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. •New Jersey Super Lawyer Rising Star (2018-2026) The Super Lawyers list is issued by Thomson Reuters
  • A description of the selection methodology can be found here
  • No aspect of this advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court of New Jersey. •New York Metro Super Lawyer Rising Star (2015-2021) •New York Metro Super Lawyer (2024-2025) Classes/Seminars Taught •Around the World in 45 Minutes, ILG 360 London Annual Conference 2023, March 15, 2023 •(Not So) Straight Forward and Freight Forward: Claims Handling Under Shipper's Interest Cargo Insurance, AIMU/MICA Seminar “Marine Insurance: A Global Perspective,” New York, June 2018 •Schoenbaum Longshore & Harbor Workers Compensation Act - Chapter 5, Marshall Dennehey Client Presentation, March 2018 •Chapter 3 -Schoenbaum's Admiralty and The General Maritime Law (3-14 through 3-24), Client Seminar, December 16, 2015 •Chapter 3 -Schoenbaum's Admiralty and The General Maritime Law (3-1 through 3-13), Client Seminar, November 17, 2015 •Impact of Long Shore and New York Labor Law, the Jones Act and McBride Decision on Punitive Damages Under Maritime Law, Client Seminar, April 2015 •Brief Overview of New York No-Fault Insurance Law, April 2012 Published Works •Case Law Alerts, regular contributor, 2016-present •“Brief Overview of Shipowner’s Limitation of Liability Act - History, Procedure and Recent Trends,” Defense Digest, Vol. 20, No. 1, March 2014 Results Claims Dismissed in Marine Construction NY Labor Law Case Our team successfully obtained summary judgment dismissing all claims against our client in a marine construction NY Labor Law case pending in Supreme Court Rockland County
  • The case involved bodily injuries sustained to an employee of our client, which was a sub-subcontractor at the site of the new Mario Cuomo Bridge
  • The property owner, general contractor and the subcontractor each cross-claimed and/or third-partied our client into the case
  • They sought contractual and common law indemnity and contribution pursuant to the terms and conditions of the various contracts
  • We argued, and the court agreed, that since there was no finding of negligence against our client causing the injuries sustained by the plaintiff, the indemnification clauses were not implicated
  • The court found that there was no evidence demonstrating that our client caused in whole or in part the injuries the plaintiff sustained
  • Successful Defense of Marine Construction New York Labor Law Case Marshall Dennehey successfully obtained summary judgment, dismissing all claims against our client in a marine construction New York Labor Law case in the Supreme Court in Rockland County
  • The case involved bodily injuries sustained to an employee of our client, a sub-subcontractor at the site of the new Mario Cuomo Bridge
  • The property owner, general contractor and the subcontractor each cross-claimed and/or third-partied our client into the case, all seeking contractual and common law indemnity and contribution pursuant to the terms and conditions of the various contracts
  • We argued, and the court agreed, that since there was no finding of negligence against our client in causing the injuries sustained to the plaintiff, the indemnification clauses were not implicated
  • The court found there was no evidence demonstrating that our client caused, in whole or in part, the injuries the plaintiff sustained
  • The plaintiff and general contractor filed motions to reargue, which were denied
  • Thought Leadership Case Law Alerts U.S
  • Supreme Court Held that Choice-of-Law Clauses in Maritime Contracts Are Presumptively Enforceable Under Federal Maritime Law April 1, 2024 On February 21, 2024, the Supreme Court of the United States, in a unanimous opinion delivered by Justice Kavanaugh, held that choice-of-law clauses in maritime contracts are presumptively enforceable under federal maritime law, subject to two narrow exceptions: (1) when the chosen law would contravene a controlling federal statute or established federal maritime policy
  • or (2) when the contracting parties cannot show any reasonable basis for the chosen jurisdiction
  • The second exception must be applied with “substantial deference to the contracting parties.” Great Lakes Insurance SE v
  • Raiders Retreat Realty Co., LLC, Case No. 22-500, Slip Op. at 10-11 (Feb. 21, 2024)
  • The Court stated that “the uniformity and predictability resulting from choice-of-law provisions are especially important for marine insurance contracts given that marine insurance is ‘an integral of virtually every maritime transaction, and maritime commerce is a vital part of the nation’s economy.’” Id. at 9 (quoting M. Sturley, Restating the Law of Marine Insurance: A Workable Solution to the Wilburn Boat Problem, 29 J. Mar
  • L. & Com. 41, 45 (1998)
  • This decision is a very favorable and significant result for marine insurers and the principle of maritime uniformity
  • Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2024 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers
  • This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship
  • Copyright 2024 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved
  • This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm
  • Case Law Alerts SCOTUS Grants Certiorari to Hear Marine Insurance Dispute April 1, 2023 The Supreme Court of the United States recently granted certiorari to decide whether, under federal admiralty law, “a choice of law clause in a maritime contract can be rendered unenforceable if enforcement is contrary to the ‘strong public policy’ of the state whose law is displaced.” The underlying claim involved damage to a vessel that ran aground, which resulted in the vessel owner filing a coverage claim under its marine insurance policy
  • The insurer denied coverage and subsequently filed a declaratory judgment action seeking to rescind the policy
  • The vessel owner then filed multiple counterclaims, including extra-contractual claims under Pennsylvania law
  • The insurer subsequently moved for judgment on the pleadings on the Pennsylvania law counterclaims, arguing that the policy’s choice of law provision required the application of New York law, precluding those counterclaims
  • The United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ruled in favor of the insurer, and the vessel owner appealed to the Third Circuit Court of Appeals
  • The Third Circuit reversed and remanded, finding that a choice of law provision is unenforceable if it “would contravene a strong public policy of the forum in which suit is brought.” The Third Circuit instructed the District Court to consider whether Pennsylvania “has a strong public policy that would be thwarted by applying New York law.” In turn, the insurer filed a petition for writ of certiorari, which the Supreme Court granted, limited to the above-referenced question
  • The Supreme Court’s decision on this issue may have wide-ranging implications on contract cases going forward, particularly those involving choice-of-law provisions
  • Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2023 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers
  • This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship
  • Copyright 2023 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved
  • This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm
  • News Marshall Dennehey Announces 2026 New York Metro Super Lawyers and Rising Stars April 27, 2026 Marshall Dennehey Announces 2026 New Jersey Super Lawyers And Rising Stars March 20, 2026

Practice Areas Explained

Christopher J. DiCicco's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Christopher J. DiCicco handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Employment Law

Employment lawyers represent workers in wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, wage & hour disputes, and severance negotiations.

Christopher J. DiCicco is one of 169,120 employment attorneys indexed nationally. Browse employment attorneys in New York →

Product Liability

Christopher J. DiCicco is one of 66,193 product liability attorneys indexed nationally. Browse product liability attorneys in New York →

Civil Litigation

Civil litigation attorneys for breach of contract, business disputes, civil rights, and class action lawsuits.

Christopher J. DiCicco is one of 454,532 litigation attorneys indexed nationally. Browse litigation attorneys in New York →

Appellate Practice

Appellate attorneys for civil and criminal appeals at state and federal court.

Christopher J. DiCicco is one of 86,319 appellate attorneys indexed nationally. Browse appellate attorneys in New York →

Maritime & Admiralty Law

Maritime attorneys for Jones Act claims, longshore injury, cruise ship cases, and offshore matters.

Christopher J. DiCicco is one of 11,568 maritime attorneys indexed nationally. Browse maritime attorneys in New York →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in New York

Practicing law in New York. Legal matters in New York are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in New York are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate New York state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in New York brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in New York courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional New York attorneys? Browse all attorneys in New York or all attorneys in New York.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Christopher J. DiCicco

Where is Christopher J. DiCicco's law office located?
Christopher J. DiCicco's law practice is located in New York, New York. The firm is Marshall Dennehey. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Christopher J. DiCicco handle?
Christopher J. DiCicco focuses on employment, product liability, litigation, appellate, maritime. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in New York.
How long has Christopher J. DiCicco practiced law?
Christopher J. DiCicco has 15+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 2011.
Where did Christopher J. DiCicco go to law school?
Christopher J. DiCicco earned their education at (J.D., 2011); (B.A., 2008).
How can I contact Christopher J. DiCicco for a consultation?
You can contact Christopher J. DiCicco directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.

Education

J.D.
Brooklyn Law School
- 2011
B.A.
Villanova University
- 2008

Bar Admissions

New Jersey
Admitted: 2011
U.S. District Court District of New Jersey
Admitted: 2011
New York
Admitted: 2012
U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York
Admitted: 2012
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York
Admitted: 2012
Pennsylvania
Admitted: 2021

Reviews

These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.