Atty. Constance T. Fuqua

Atty. Constance T. Fuqua

Constance T. Fuqua is a lawyer practicing divorce, family law, litigation.

Phoenix Phoenix 37 yrs experience 37 year
Call (480) 630-8522 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Constance T. Fuqua at a glance

Constance T. Fuqua is a divorce, family law, and litigation attorney based in Phoenix, Arizona. They have 37+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 1989. Admitted to practice in New Mexico (1989), U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico (1990), Navajo Nation (1993), and U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit (1996). Educated at University of Arizona (J.D., 1989) and Arizona State University (B.S., 1981). Serands clients in Phoenix, AZ and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

  • Constance T. Fuqua is a lawyer practicing divorce, family law, litigation
  • Constance T. received a B.S. degree from Arizona State University in 1981, and has been licensed for 37 years
  • Constance T. practices in Phoenix, AZ

Practice Areas Explained

Constance T. Fuqua's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Constance T. Fuqua handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Divorce

A divorce attorney guides you through property division, spousal support, custody, and the final decree — contested or uncontested.

Constance T. Fuqua is one of 50,487 divorce attorneys indexed nationally. Browse divorce attorneys in Arizona →

Family Law

Family law attorneys handle divorce, child custody, child support, adoption, prenups, and protective orders. Find verified family lawyers near you.

Constance T. Fuqua is one of 187,066 family law attorneys indexed nationally. Browse family law attorneys in Arizona →

Civil Litigation

Civil litigation attorneys for breach of contract, business disputes, civil rights, and class action lawsuits.

Constance T. Fuqua is one of 454,532 litigation attorneys indexed nationally. Browse litigation attorneys in Arizona →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in Arizona

Practicing law in Arizona. Legal matters in Arizona are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Phoenix are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Arizona state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Arizona brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Arizona courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional Arizona attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Phoenix or all attorneys in Arizona.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Constance T. Fuqua

Where is Constance T. Fuqua's law office located?
Constance T. Fuqua's law practice is located in Phoenix, Arizona. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Constance T. Fuqua handle?
Constance T. Fuqua focuses on divorce, family law, litigation. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in Arizona.
How long has Constance T. Fuqua practiced law?
Constance T. Fuqua has 37+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 1989.
Where did Constance T. Fuqua go to law school?
Constance T. Fuqua earned their education at (J.D., 1989); (B.S., 1981).
How can I contact Constance T. Fuqua for a consultation?
You can contact Constance T. Fuqua directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.

Practice Areas

Education

J.D.
University of Arizona
- 1989
B.S.
Arizona State University
- 1981

Bar Admissions

New Mexico
Admitted: 1989
U.S. District Court, District of New Mexico
Admitted: 1990
Navajo Nation
Admitted: 1993
U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
Admitted: 1996

Reviews

These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.