Atty. David Kantz Hughes

Atty. David Kantz Hughes

David Kantz Hughes is a lawyer practicing litigation, constitutional law, public entity law. David received a B.S.B.A. degree from University of Denver in 1966, and has been licensed for 52 years.

Santa Barbara Santa Barbara 52 yrs experience 52 year
Call (213) 539-2626 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About David Kantz Hughes at a glance

David Kantz Hughes is a litigation and civil rights attorney based in Santa Barbara, California. They have 52+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 1974. Admitted to practice in California (1974) and U.S. District Court, Central District of California and U.S. Supreme Court (1979). Educated at University of Virginia (J.D., 1973) and University of Denver (B.S.B.A., 1966). Recognitions include AV Preeminent. Serands clients in Santa Barbara, CA and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

  • David Kantz Hughes is a lawyer practicing litigation, constitutional law, public entity law
  • David received a B.S.B.A. degree from University of Denver in 1966, and has been licensed for 52 years
  • David practices in Santa Barbara, CA

Practice Areas Explained

David Kantz Hughes's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases David Kantz Hughes handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Civil Litigation

Civil litigation attorneys for breach of contract, business disputes, civil rights, and class action lawsuits.

David Kantz Hughes is one of 454,532 litigation attorneys indexed nationally. Browse litigation attorneys in California →

Civil Rights

Civil rights attorneys for discrimination, police misconduct, constitutional rights, and civil liberties cases.

David Kantz Hughes is one of 70,245 civil rights attorneys indexed nationally. Browse civil rights attorneys in California →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in California

Practicing law in California. Legal matters in California are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Santa Barbara are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate California state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in California brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in California courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional California attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Santa Barbara or all attorneys in California.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about David Kantz Hughes

Where is David Kantz Hughes's law office located?
David Kantz Hughes's law practice is located in Santa Barbara, California. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does David Kantz Hughes handle?
David Kantz Hughes focuses on litigation, civil rights. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in California.
How long has David Kantz Hughes practiced law?
David Kantz Hughes has 52+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 1974.
Where did David Kantz Hughes go to law school?
David Kantz Hughes earned their education at (J.D., 1973); (B.S.B.A., 1966).
How can I contact David Kantz Hughes for a consultation?
You can contact David Kantz Hughes directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.
What awards or recognition has David Kantz Hughes received?
David Kantz Hughes's notable recognition includes: AV Preeminent.

Education

J.D.
University of Virginia
- 1973
B.S.B.A.
University of Denver
- 1966

Awards

AV Preeminent

Bar Admissions

California
Admitted: 1974
U.S. District Court, Central District of California and U.S. Supreme Court
Admitted: 1979

Reviews

5.0
1 Review
5 0
4 0
3 0
2 0
1 0
These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.