Atty. Jonathan C. Hamilton

Atty. Jonathan C. Hamilton

Practice Experience Jonathan is a leading global authority on international disputes and investment, as well as complex negotiations and crisis management. As head of Latin American arbitration, he has successfully advised on some of the most critical issues of the era in Latin America and beyond, such as the cultural patrimony of Machu Picchu, the new Ecuador international airport, the Argentine sovereign debt crisis, the development of the Peruvian energy sector and the Panama Canal expansion.

Call (202) 551-1700 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Jonathan C. Hamilton at a glance

Jonathan C. Hamilton is a adr and international attorney based in Washington, District of Columbia, practicing at Paul Hastings LLP. Admitted to practice in District of Columbia, United States and New York, United States. Educated at University of Virginia (J.D., 2000) and Brandeis University (BA). Recognitions include Best Lawyers in America — International Arbitration - Commercial (2026), Best Lawyers in America — International Arbitration - Governmental (2026), and Best Lawyers in America — Awards: (2026). Serands clients in Washington, DC and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

Practice Experience
Jonathan is a leading global authority on international disputes and investment, as well as complex negotiations and crisis management.

As head of Latin American arbitration, he has successfully advised on some of the most critical issues of the era in Latin America and beyond, such as the cultural patrimony of Machu Picchu, the new Ecuador international airport, the Argentine sovereign debt crisis, the development of the Peruvian energy sector and the Panama Canal expansion. Jonathan’s practice is ranked at the top of its field byChambers Global, Chambers USA and Chambers Latin America, which describes the practice as "a powerhouse at the forefront of Latin American international arbitration". Recognition of his specific recent matters includes, among others:
  • 2013 OGEMID Most Influential Arbitration Award of the Decade
  • 2012 OGEMID Best Arbitration Award
  • 2011 Latin Lawyer Deal of the Year/Disputes
  • 2010 Latin Lawyer Deal of the Year/Finalist Disputes
  • 2009 Latin Lawyer Deal of the Year/Disputes
  • 2008 OGEMID Best Arbitration Award

    Jonathan also has been individually recognized as one of the top lawyers in his field and was one of ten lawyers worldwide nominated for Global Arbitration ReviewAdvocate of the Year. Chambers and Legal 500 and clients have described him as follows:
    • "a super-lawyer-dealmaker"
    • "single-minded commitment to the client’s cause"
    • "very impressive advocacy" with "impressive grasp of strategy"
    • "great negotiator" and "true Latin American specialist"
    • "deep understanding and efficiency" and "tenacity"
    • "experience, expertise, commitment and dynamism"

      Jonathan is a recognised thought leader on both Latin American policy and international investment and arbitration. He teaches international contract negotiations at the University of Miami and lectures widely at leading universities. Key publications include:

        Based in Washington, DC, and Latin America, Jonathan started his career at White & Case in the New York office, spent several years in the Mexico City office and also worked as a visiting associate with a major firm in Lima. He is committed to social development and has served on the US-Mexico Foundation board, the Vance Center for International Justice board, foreign policy working groups and as an international election observer. He also worked as an assistant to legal fiction author John Grisham and a federal law clerk.

        Selected examples of his experience include:
        • Foreign Investment, including success in Aguaytia v. Peru, a US$150 million case named Latin Lawyer Dispute of the Year 2009, called "a strong precedent for stability agreements as a means of protecting foreign investment." (Chambers)
        • Energy Projects, such as victories in a US$300 million Energy Charter Treaty oil and gas case named Award of the Year 2008 (OGEMID), and a case where the client "escaped a US$174 million sword of Damocles." (GAR)
        • Infrastructure/Construction Projects, including Convial v. Peru, related to a toll road concession, and PIATCO v. Philippines, a victory in a US$565 million commercial construction arbitration, GAR Win of the Year 2010 finalist.
        • Complex Negotiations, including the resolution of disputes and renegotiation of the project financing for the US$650 million Quito, Ecuador airport in "one of the most complex project disputes in Latin America's recent history" involving "myriad proceedings under contracts and treaties." (Latin Lawyer, American Lawyer)
        • Sovereign Finance, including "the first prominent use of an investment protection treaty to challenge a sovereign government's handling of a default and restructuring" and a landmark decision described as "a wake-up call" with a result "whose effects may reverberate widely." (IAReporter)
        • Complex Procedure and Mass Claims, advising tens of thousands holders of bonds in a "novel" case "closely watched because of its importance to multi-party arbitration." Named Arbitration Decision of the Year 2011 and Most Surprising Decision of the Year 2011. (GAR, American Lawyer)
        • Cultural Patrimony, assisting Peru on the return of artifacts removed almost a century ago from Machu Picchu with a result that sends "a message to collectors around the world." (The Economist). Latin Lawyer Dispute of the Year 2010 finalist.
        • Social Development, with a commitment to public service and pro bono work, including serving on the US-Mexico Foundation board, the Vance Center on International Justice board, foreign policy working groups and as an international election observer.

          Selected Examples of Client Matters
          Mr. Hamilton's experience has included, among other examples, the following matters:
          • An airport concession in Ecuador
          • A metallurgical facility in Peru
          • Sovereign bonds issued by Argentina
          • A hydroelectric project in Ecuador
          • A gold mine in Venezuela
          • A port in Peru
          • A toll road in Peru
          • Transmission lines in Peru
          • Electricity concessions in Peru
          • An oil refinery in Bulgaria
          • A real estate development in Chile
          • An airport in the Philippines
          • Public utilities in Argentina
          • A publishing enterprise in Chile
          • Diverse outbound investment from Brazil
          • A concession with Paraguay
          • A factory in El Salvador
          • An airline in Peru
          • A tunnel and hydroelectric project in Bolivia
          • An airport project in Costa Rica
          • An oil and gas and construction project in Mexico
          • A historic site and related artifacts in Peru
          • A joint venture in Brazil
          • Nuclear materials from CIS
          • A commodity sold into Mexico
          • A construction project in the Philippines
          • Energy procurement in Mexico
          • A banking dispute involving Colombia
          • Debt collection in Mexico and other markets
          • A telecommunications project in Mexico
          • An energy project in Venezuela
          • A telecommunications project in Argentina
          • Disputes before diverse courts and involving the arbitration rules of the American Arbitration Association (AAA), Inter-American Commercial Arbitration Commission (IACAC), International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID), International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA) and United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), as well as various local arbitral institutions
          • Advising on matters arising under treaties such as bilateral investment treaties (BITs), Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and Central American Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA-DR)
          • Drafting and advising on dispute resolution mechanisms and arbitration clauses at the time of contract
          • Transactions involving project financing, lending, leasing, joint ventures, dispute mechanisms, restructuring, settlements and diverse foreign investment issues

    Practice Areas Explained

    Jonathan C. Hamilton's Areas of Practice

    Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Jonathan C. Hamilton handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

    Mediation & Arbitration

    Mediators and arbitrators for civil, commercial, family, and employment dispute resolution.

    Jonathan C. Hamilton is one of 73,906 adr attorneys indexed nationally. Browse adr attorneys in District of Columbia →

    International Law

    International law attorneys for cross-border transactions, trade, foreign investment, and treaties.

    Jonathan C. Hamilton is one of 40,133 international attorneys indexed nationally. Browse international attorneys in District of Columbia →

    Jurisdictional Context

    Why local counsel matters in District of Columbia

    Practicing law in District of Columbia. Legal matters in District of Columbia are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Washington are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate District of Columbia state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in District of Columbia brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in District of Columbia courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

    Looking for additional District of Columbia attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Washington or all attorneys in District of Columbia.

    Frequently Asked

    Common questions about Jonathan C. Hamilton

    Where is Jonathan C. Hamilton's law office located?
    Jonathan C. Hamilton's law practice is located in Washington, District of Columbia. The firm is Paul Hastings LLP. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
    What practice areas does Jonathan C. Hamilton handle?
    Jonathan C. Hamilton focuses on adr, international. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in District of Columbia.
    Where did Jonathan C. Hamilton go to law school?
    Jonathan C. Hamilton earned their education at (J.D., 2000); (BA).
    How can I contact Jonathan C. Hamilton for a consultation?
    You can contact Jonathan C. Hamilton directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.
    What awards or recognition has Jonathan C. Hamilton received?
    Jonathan C. Hamilton's notable recognition includes: Best Lawyers in America — International Arbitration - Commercial; Best Lawyers in America — International Arbitration - Governmental; Best Lawyers in America — Awards:; Best Lawyers in America — LatinLawyer; Best Lawyers in America — Global Arbitration Review.

    Education

    J.D.
    University of Virginia
    - 2000
    BA
    Brandeis University
    - In Progress

    Awards

    Best Lawyers in America — International Arbitration - Commercial
    - 2026
    Best Lawyers in America — International Arbitration - Governmental
    - 2026
    Best Lawyers in America — Awards:
    - 2026
    Best Lawyers in America — LatinLawyer
    - 2026
    Best Lawyers in America — Global Arbitration Review
    - 2026
    Best Lawyers in America — Chambers Latin America
    - 2026
    Best Lawyers in America — The International Who's Who of Comm. Arbitration
    - 2026

    Bar Admissions

    District of Columbia, United States
    New York, United States

    Reviews

    These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

    No reviews yet.