Atty. Kenneth P. Held

Atty. Kenneth P. Held

Kenneth Held is an experienced trial attorney who focuses his practice on business litigation in state and federal courts, arbitration and regulatory enforcement matters, with a particular emphasis on securities litigation, energy litigation and class action defense. His clients range from individuals to publicly traded and privately held companies, as well as private equity firms and hedge funds.

Call (713) 255-0422 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Kenneth P. Held at a glance

Kenneth P. Held is a business, litigation, and energy attorney based in Houston, Texas, practicing at Fletcher Held. Educated at Yale University (JD, 1993) and Cornell University (BA). Recognitions include Best Lawyers in America — Commercial Litigation (2026), Best Lawyers in America — Energy Regulatory Law (2026), and Best Lawyers in America — Litigation - Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy) (2026). Serands clients in Houston, TX and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

Kenneth Held is an experienced trial attorney who focuses his practice on business litigation in state and federal courts, arbitration and regulatory enforcement matters, with a particular emphasis on securities litigation, energy litigation and class action defense. His clients range from individuals to publicly traded and privately held companies, as well as private equity firms and hedge funds.

Mr. Held has significant experience in securities litigation and defending corporate and individual clients against shareholder and consumer class actions, as well as derivative actions. He has handled cases relating to stock-drop securities fraud, merger challenges, fiduciary duty, ERISA stock-drop class actions and insider trading investigations.

In the energy sector, Mr. Held has represented both plaintiffs/claimants and defendants/respondents in a wide range of disputes, including those concerning price reopener issues, long-term gas supply contracts, crude oil quality, joint operating agreements, and purchase agreements and pricing.

Mr. Held has been recognized for his litigation achievements, specifically for his securities work, in Chambers USA, The Legal 500 and U.S. News – Best Lawyers.

Illustrative representations prior to joining Skadden include:

Securities and Derivative Litigation

Stock Drop Class Actions

  • obtained dismissal of SEC Rule 10b-5 and Section 11 class actions at motion to dismiss stage filed against numerous companies and their officers and directors, including Blockbuster, a hospice care network, a mobile phone service provider and a Big Four accounting firm; also obtained dismissal of related ERISA class actions, state court actions and derivative actions;
  • defended an Oklahoma oil and gas company and its officers and directors in Section 11 class action and related claims filed by creditor trustee; case settled on satisfactory terms;
  • obtained dismissal of 10b-5 and Section 11 claims against Blockbuster and certain of its officers and directors arising from Blockbuster’s split-off from Viacom, Inc.; also obtained dismissal of related state law claims asserted in the class action suit filed in the Delaware Chancery Court and related ERISA stock drop class action;
  • obtained dismissal of 10b-5 claims against hospice care provider after market capitalization dropped $300 million (as well as dismissal of companion state and federal court derivative actions);
  • obtained dismissal of 10b-5 and Section 11 claims against mobile phone service provider after drop in subscribers and revenues (as well as dismissal of companion state and federal court derivative actions);
  • obtained dismissal of 10b-5 claims against Big Four accounting firm arising from its client’s restatement of earnings;
  • obtained dismissal of 10b-5 claims against Blockbuster after drop in revenues and loss of $2 billion in market capitalization (as well as dismissal of companion state court derivative action);
  • represented Heelys, Inc. in a securities class action, derivative actions and individual shareholder lawsuits arising from drop in stock price after IPO; cases were settled to the client’s satisfaction;
  • defeated class certification in securities fraud action asserted against a Big Four accounting firm based on the plaintiffs’ inability to demonstrate a fraud-on-the-market classwide presumption of reliance;

Master Limited Partnership Securities Litigation

  • represented conflicts committee of pipeline MLP in lawsuit challenging acquisition of MLP by its general partner; case settled on satisfactory terms that allowed merger to close and settlement was upheld on appeal after objections were filed;
  • obtained dismissal of claims asserted in Delaware against a publicly traded general partner of a gas and crude oil processing and transportation MLP and certain of its directors regarding its sale of certain assets to the MLP and the subsequent merger of the general partner with the MLP;
  • in a separate Delaware litigation, defeated a motion to expedite proceedings seeking to enjoin the MLP’s acquisition of its general partner; merger closed after plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their claims;
  • on behalf of the conflicts and governance committee of a publicly traded MLP, defeated a motion to expedite Texas litigation seeking to enjoin the MLP’s $2.5 billion acquisition by its majority unitholder; merger closed and plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their claims;

Merger Challenge Litigation

  • represented a subsea pipeline company and its officers and directors in Texas and Louisiana state and federal courts challenging the company’s acquisition for $1 billion; case settled on satisfactory terms that allowed the merger to close;

SEC Enforcement Actions

  • represented numerous individuals in various insider trading and accounting fraud SEC investigations, many of which were terminated with no action taken against the clients;

Shareholder Disputes

  • defended private equity fund and related entities in shareholder oppression lawsuit related to acquisition and management of bank; after significant pre-trial motion practice and prior to commencement of depositions, plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed all claims; defended individual investment professional against RICO, fraud, and breach of fiduciary duty claims concerning real estate investment in two-week jury trial; jury ruled in favor of client on RICO and fiduciary duty claims and apportioned client only 1% liability on remaining claim;
  • obtained significant settlement for two individuals who were wrongfully denied partnership interest in company they co-founded to develop LNG export terminals;

Energy Litigation and Arbitration

  • represented midstream company in joint venture dispute regarding construction and operation of cogeneration facility; case settled satisfactorily to client;
  • obtained jury verdict for offshore drilling company in lawsuit to recover unpaid joint interest billings; verdict upheld on appeal;
  • on behalf of a Canadian crude oil trading company, prevailed in a New York arbitration to recover payments due for two cargoes of Canadian mixed sweet crude oil that the client sold to another trading company; panel ruled that cargoes met contractual specifications and awarded damages and attorneys’ fees of $3.8 million to the client;
  • represented an energy trading and marketing firm in a price-reopener dispute under a long-term gas supply contract with an electrical cooperative in an American Arbitration Association proceeding; shortly before the hearing, the dispute was settled with a favorable price adjustment for the client;
  • represented a chemical pipeline manufacturer in bankruptcy proceedings in which the debtor/lessor sought to recharacterize a pipeline lease agreement as an unsecured sale of pipeline; case settled favorably for the client;
  • on behalf of private equity fund portfolio company, prevailed in a Canadian arbitration to recover the disputed amount of purchase price paid for natural gas storage facilities; arbitrator found that the gas remaining in the facility was cushion gas (not working gas) for which the client should have been required to pay an additional purchase price amount and awarded the client $17.7 million; respondent’s appeal of the award was denied by the Court of Queen’s Bench of Alberta; and
  • in a Canadian arbitration, obtained a liability finding in favor of a gas and power trading and marketing company against a major o

Practice Areas Explained

Kenneth P. Held's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Kenneth P. Held handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Business & Corporate Law

Business attorneys advise founders and growing companies on entity formation, contracts, financing, M&A, and dispute resolution.

Kenneth P. Held is one of 501,317 business attorneys indexed nationally. Browse business attorneys in Texas →

Civil Litigation

Civil litigation attorneys for breach of contract, business disputes, civil rights, and class action lawsuits.

Kenneth P. Held is one of 454,532 litigation attorneys indexed nationally. Browse litigation attorneys in Texas →

Energy & Utilities Law

Energy attorneys for oil & gas, renewables, utility regulation, and energy sector transactions.

Kenneth P. Held is one of 36,230 energy attorneys indexed nationally. Browse energy attorneys in Texas →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in Texas

Practicing law in Texas. Legal matters in Texas are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Houston are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Texas state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Texas brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Texas courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional Texas attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Houston or all attorneys in Texas.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Kenneth P. Held

Where is Kenneth P. Held's law office located?
Kenneth P. Held's law practice is located in Houston, Texas. The firm is Fletcher Held. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Kenneth P. Held handle?
Kenneth P. Held focuses on business, litigation, energy. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in Texas.
Where did Kenneth P. Held go to law school?
Kenneth P. Held earned their education at (JD, 1993); (BA).
How can I contact Kenneth P. Held for a consultation?
You can contact Kenneth P. Held directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.
What awards or recognition has Kenneth P. Held received?
Kenneth P. Held's notable recognition includes: Best Lawyers in America — Commercial Litigation; Best Lawyers in America — Energy Regulatory Law; Best Lawyers in America — Litigation - Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy); Best Lawyers in America — Litigation - Securities; Best Lawyers in America — Additional Areas of Practice:.

Education

JD
Yale University
- 1993
BA
Cornell University
- In Progress

Awards

Best Lawyers in America — Commercial Litigation
- 2026
Best Lawyers in America — Energy Regulatory Law
- 2026
Best Lawyers in America — Litigation - Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy)
- 2026
Best Lawyers in America — Litigation - Securities
- 2026
Best Lawyers in America — Additional Areas of Practice:
- 2026
Best Lawyers in America — Securities / Capital Markets Law
- 2026
Best Lawyers in America — Special Focus:
- 2026
Best Lawyers in America — Litigation
- 2026
Lawyer of the Year — Litigation - Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy) (Houston)
- 2025
Lawyer of the Year — Litigation - Regulatory Enforcement (SEC, Telecom, Energy) (Houston)
- 2023

Reviews

These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.