Atty. Lee Arthur Caplan

Atty. Lee Arthur Caplan

Mr. Lee Arthur Caplan is a lawyer practicing delivery of legal services, real estate.

Easton Easton 41 yrs experience 41 year
Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Lee Arthur Caplan at a glance

Lee Arthur Caplan is a real estate attorney based in Easton, Maryland. They have 41+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 1985. Admitted to practice in Maryland (1985), U.S. District Court, District of Maryland (1985), District of Columbia (1986), and West Virginia (1991). Educated at University of Baltimore (J.D., 1984) and Frostburg State College (B.S., 1977). Recognitions include Peer Reviewed. Active member of Allegany County (Member, Board of Advisors, Human Resources Development Commission-Legal Services Referral Program), Garrett County, Mineral County, Maryland State and American Bar Associations West Virginia State Bar District of Columbia Bar. Serands clients in Easton, MD and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

  • Mr. Lee Arthur Caplan is a lawyer practicing delivery of legal services, real estate
  • Lee Arthur received a B.S. degree from Frostburg State College in 1977, and has been licensed for 41 years
  • Lee Arthur practices in Easton, MD

Practice Areas Explained

Lee Arthur Caplan's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Lee Arthur Caplan handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Real Estate Law

Real estate attorneys handle home purchases, sales, commercial transactions, title disputes, and landlord-tenant matters.

Lee Arthur Caplan is one of 316,149 real estate attorneys indexed nationally. Browse real estate attorneys in Maryland →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in Maryland

Practicing law in Maryland. Legal matters in Maryland are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Easton are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Maryland state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Maryland brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Maryland courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional Maryland attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Easton or all attorneys in Maryland.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Lee Arthur Caplan

Where is Lee Arthur Caplan's law office located?
Lee Arthur Caplan's law practice is located in Easton, Maryland. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Lee Arthur Caplan handle?
Lee Arthur Caplan focuses on real estate. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in Maryland.
How long has Lee Arthur Caplan practiced law?
Lee Arthur Caplan has 41+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 1985.
Where did Lee Arthur Caplan go to law school?
Lee Arthur Caplan earned their education at (J.D., 1984); (B.S., 1977).
How can I contact Lee Arthur Caplan for a consultation?
You can contact Lee Arthur Caplan directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.
What awards or recognition has Lee Arthur Caplan received?
Lee Arthur Caplan's notable recognition includes: Peer Reviewed.

Education

J.D.
University of Baltimore
- 1984
B.S.
Frostburg State College
- 1977

Awards

Peer Reviewed

Bar Admissions

Maryland
Admitted: 1985
U.S. District Court, District of Maryland
Admitted: 1985
District of Columbia
Admitted: 1986
West Virginia
Admitted: 1991
U.S. District Court, Northern and Southern Districts of West Virginia and U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Nor
Admitted: 1991
North Carolina U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Maryland
Admitted: 2002

Reviews

3.4
2 Review
5 0
4 0
3 0
2 0
1 0
These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.