Atty. Michelle N. Michael
Michelle is a member of the Professional Liability Department. She focuses her practice on employment law and represents employers in the defense of matters involving allegations of discrimination based upon age, gender, race, and disability, as well as “whistle blowing” claims.
Profile Summary
About Michelle N. Michael at a glance
Michelle N. Michael is an Associate based in Mount Laurel, New Jersey, practicing at Marshall Dennehey. They have 8+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 2018. Their practice focuses on employment, civil rights, and animal law. Admitted to practice in New Jersey (2018) and U.S. District Court of New Jersey (2018). Educated at Rutgers School of Law (J.D., 2017) and Rider University (B.A., 2013). Serands clients in Mount Laurel, NJ and the surrounding metropolitan area.
Want to Get Service From This Attorney?
Sign up free and choose one of the two methods below.
Have a legal question? Sign up free, submit it through the Ask the Attorney module and receive a focused answer from a specialist.
- Free to ask a question
- Answers from specialist attorneys
- Optional private / anonymous question
Request an online video meeting or an in-person consultation at the attorney's office. Pick a time that works for you and share the details securely.
- Online video meeting
- In-person at the attorney's office
- Secure messaging and payment
About
- Michelle is a member of the Professional Liability Department
- She focuses her practice on employment law and represents employers in the defense of matters involving allegations of discrimination based upon age, gender, race, and disability, as well as “whistle blowing” claims
- Michelle also handles matters involving civil rights and discrimination claims in both federal and state courts
- In 2013, Michelle graduated summa cum laude from Rider University, earning her Bachelor of Arts Degree in Sociology, with minors in Legal Studies and Political Communications
- In May 2017, she earned her juris doctor degree from Rutgers Law School
- During law school, Michelle served as the Lead Research & Writing/Communications Editor of the Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion
- Michelle was also semi-finalist in the Rutgers Law School Hunter Moot Court Appellate Advocacy Competition and served as a board member of the program during her final year of law school
- Additionally, Michelle competed in the Jeffrey G. Miller National Environmental Law Moot Court Competition, serving as captain of her team
- Michelle also participated in the Rutgers Law School Civil Practice Clinic
- Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Michelle clerked for the Honorable Richard J. Geiger of the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division
- Michelle also served as an intern to the Honorable Peter G. Sheridan, United States District Court Judge for the District of New Jersey, during law school
- Published Works •'Can a Documented COVID-19 Infection Lead to a Disability Claim Under the NJLAD?', New Jersey Law Journal, Co-Author, March 9, 2022 •'NJ Supreme Court Confirms Scope and Application of the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act,' New Jersey Law Journal, April 14, 2021 •'Can Employers Require Employees to Get a Vaccine, Once Approved?', The Legal Intelligencer, Employment Law Supplement, October 27, 2020 •'A Case Law Update on the Status of Obesity as a Disability Under the NJLAD -- Dickson v
- Community Bus Lines, Inc.', New Jersey Labor & Employment Law, a publication of the New Jersey State Bar Association, December 2019 Results Obtained a “No Cause” Verdict in an Employment Case in New Jersey We recently obtained a “no cause” verdict in an employment case in the Superior Court of New Jersey
- The plaintiff, an employee of a New Jersey State entity, asserted violations of the Contentious Employee Protection Act (CEPA)
- According to the plaintiff, after reporting purported deficiencies with an environmental permit, he was subject to a retaliatory and hostile work environment
- We successfully argued that the plaintiff did not articulate a violation of law or public policy, nor did he prove that the various employment actions he received created a hostile work environment or were even caused by the alleged whistleblowing
- New Jersey State University Successfully Defended in an Employment Discrimination Case We obtained a “no cause” verdict in an employment discrimination case for a New Jersey state university
- The plaintiff, seeking back pay, front pay, emotional distress, attorney fees, punitive damages and costs, alleged she was terminated from her position as director of the university’s performing arts center due to her age, gender and/or in retaliation for reporting internal complaints of age/gender discrimination
- We successfully argued that the plaintiff was not terminated for discriminatory/retaliatory reasons but, instead, was terminated as a result of mandatory COVID-19 closures necessitated by Executive Orders
- Thought Leadership Case Law Alerts Appellate Division Rejects Plaintiff’s Belatedly-Added Theory of Disability Discrimination and Finds a One-Time Allergic Reaction to Prescription Medication Does Not Constitute a Disability Under the LAD April 1, 2026 The plaintiff appealed from the grant of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing her claims of disability discrimination under the LAD.The plaintiff, who was employed as a special education aide, was terminated following a “narcotic drug-induced medical emergency” after taking prescribed medications for sciatica pain
- She thereafter filed suit, citing sciatica pain as her alleged disability, contending that her termination was motivated by discriminatory animus.On appeal, the plaintiff argued the trial court erred in failing to find that she established a prima facie case of disability discrimination based on two separate alleged disabilities: (1) her sciatica and (2) her alleged severe allergy to medications, which was not cited as an alleged disability in the complaint.The Appellate Division affirmed, finding no evidence that the plaintiff was terminated, nor discriminatorily treated, because of her sciatica
- With respect to the allegation that her allergic reaction to medication constituted a disability, the Appellate Division, citing Stewart v
- N.J
- Tpk
- Auth./Garden State Parkway, 249 N.J. 642, 648 (2022), noted that “[g]enerally, parties may not use a motion for summary judgment to introduce new claims or theories.”Nonetheless, in considering whether a one-time allergic reaction constitutes a disability under the LAD, the court found, citing Guzman v
- Teixeira Int’l, Inc., 476 N.J
- Super. 64, 70 (App
- Div. 2023), that a single allergic reaction to medication did not qualify as a disability under the LAD, stating that the plaintiff could not prove that the termination was motivated by discrimination.In light of this decision, defense counsel should be cognizant of the introduction of new theories of liability added at the summary judgment stage, and should also recognize that not every illness will constitute a disability under the LAD
- Case Law Alerts New Jersey Appellate Division Addresses the Statute of Limitations Accrual Date in a Constructive Discharge Claim Brought Under the NJLAD and CEPA April 1, 2024 This appeal involved the analysis of the accrual date in the context of a constructive discharge claim brought under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD) and the Contentious Employee Protection Act (CEPA)
- The trial court held the “critical date” for the accrual of claims brought under LAD and CEPA was the start of the plaintiff’s workplace leave period, rather than the date said leave ended
- The Appellate Division affirmed the dismissal, finding the plaintiff’s claims were time barred
- The plaintiff filed suit two years and ten months after taking a workplace leave, asserting a claim of constructive discharge in violation of LAD and CEPA
- The trial court dismissed the complaint as barred by the applicable statute of limitations
- On appeal, the plaintiff argued the cause of action did not accrue until the date the leave ended, rather than when it began
- The Appellate Division emphasized the two-year statute of limitations for LAD claims and the one-year statute of limitations for CEPA claims, holding that “[t]he critical date of accrual is the date on which the plaintiff felt compelled to stop working.” In light of this decision, defense counsel should be cognizant of the triggering event pled in a complaint for purposes of asserting statute of limitations-based defenses
- Case Law Alerts, 2nd Quarter, April 2024 is prepared by Marshall Dennehey to provide information on recent developments of interest to our readers
- This publication is not intended to provide legal advice for a specific situation or to create an attorney-client relationship
- Copyright 2024 Marshall Dennehey, all rights reserved
- This article may not be reprinted without the express written permission of our firm
Practice Areas Explained
Michelle N. Michael's Areas of Practice
Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Michelle N. Michael handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.
Employment lawyers represent workers in wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, wage & hour disputes, and severance negotiations.
Michelle N. Michael is one of 169,120 employment attorneys indexed nationally. Browse employment attorneys in New Jersey →
Civil rights attorneys for discrimination, police misconduct, constitutional rights, and civil liberties cases.
Michelle N. Michael is one of 70,245 civil rights attorneys indexed nationally. Browse civil rights attorneys in New Jersey →
Animal law attorneys for pet custody, veterinary malpractice, animal welfare, and dangerous dog cases.
Michelle N. Michael is one of 5,126 animal law attorneys indexed nationally. Browse animal law attorneys in New Jersey →
Jurisdictional Context
Why local counsel matters in New Jersey
Practicing law in New Jersey. Legal matters in New Jersey are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Mount Laurel are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate New Jersey state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in New Jersey brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in New Jersey courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.
Looking for additional New Jersey attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Mount Laurel or all attorneys in New Jersey.
Frequently Asked
Common questions about Michelle N. Michael
Where is Michelle N. Michael's law office located?
What practice areas does Michelle N. Michael handle?
How long has Michelle N. Michael practiced law?
Where did Michelle N. Michael go to law school?
How can I contact Michelle N. Michael for a consultation?
Education
Bar Admissions
Reviews
No reviews yet.