Atty. Nathan B. Webb
Nathan B. Webb focuses his practice in intellectual property litigation.
Profile Summary
About Nathan B. Webb at a glance
Nathan B. Webb is a Partner based in Cleveland, Ohio, practicing at Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP. They have 17+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 2009. Their practice focuses on patent, trademark, ip, trade secrets, and ip licensing. Admitted to practice in Ohio U.S. Supreme Court U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit registered to practice before (2009). Educated at Friends University (B.A. History, 2006) and University of Kansas School of Law (J.D., 2000). Serands clients in Cleveland, OH and the surrounding metropolitan area.
Want to Get Service From This Attorney?
Sign up free and choose one of the two methods below.
Have a legal question? Sign up free, submit it through the Ask the Attorney module and receive a focused answer from a specialist.
- Free to ask a question
- Answers from specialist attorneys
- Optional private / anonymous question
Request an online video meeting or an in-person consultation at the attorney's office. Pick a time that works for you and share the details securely.
- Online video meeting
- In-person at the attorney's office
- Secure messaging and payment
About
- Nathan B. Webb focuses his practice in intellectual property litigation
- He has experience representing clients in a wide variety of intellectual property disputes, including patent, trademark and copyright infringement lawsuits
- domain-name and trade-secret litigation
- and trademark opposition proceedings in both state and federal courts
- He also advises clients on various pre-litigation matters, provides opinions of counsel on product clearance or patent infringement, and manages trademark and patent enforcement efforts
- Nathan has extensive experience in intellectual property transactional matters, such as drafting patent and trademark licensing and assignment agreements, company patent procurement and protection polices, and non-competition and confidentiality agreements
- As a registered patent attorney, Nathan also has experience drafting and prosecuting patents in the mechanical, chemical and biological arts
- Before becoming a patent attorney, he was a professor managing Washburn Law School's criminal appellate advocacy clinic and an attorney at the Kansas Appellate Defender Office
- Professional History • Partner, Hahn Loeser & Parks LLP, 2016-present
- Of Counsel, 2014-15
- Associate, 2013-14 • Partner, Emerson Thomson Bennett, LLC, 2008-13 • Visiting Assistant Professor of Law, Washburn University School of Law, 2004-06 • Assistant Appellate Defender, Kansas Appellate Defender Office, 2000-06 Personal A former college athlete, Nathan's hobbies include basketball, biking and running
- he also enjoys gardening, travel and spending time with his daughters
- Experience • Sinclair-Allison v
- Fifth Avenue Physician Services, et al. (Okla
- Fed
- D. Ct.)
- Represented plaintiff in pending infringement lawsuit covering patented business methods. • Lecat's Ventriloscope v
- University of New England (Maine Fed
- D. Ct.)
- Served as lead counsel in pending patent infringement lawsuit on behalf of medical device company. • NuVo Grand, LLC v
- Oliver’s Products (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.)
- Represented plaintiff in false advertising and unfair competition lawsuit. • The Shamrock Companies v
- Prime Business Solution, et al. (Cuyahoga Court Common Pleas, Ohio) (2012)
- Successfully resisted efforts to obtain temporary restraining order in representation of defendants in unfair competition, tortious interference and trade secret misappropriation lawsuit. • Vyapar Capital Market Partners v
- Valmark Securities (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board)
- Represented trademark applicant in United States Patent and Trademark Office opposition proceedings. • Delta Media Group v
- Chartwell Realty Group, et al. (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.) (2012)
- Represented co-defendants in breach of contract and copyright infringement lawsuit. • Volkswagen AG v
- Vee Dub Parts Unlimited (Virginia Fed
- D. Ct.) (2012)
- Served as lead counsel for California defendant in trademark infringement and cyber-squatting lawsuit. • ABB v
- WorkStations Express (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.) (2012)
- Represented defendant, an Ohio small business, against a multi-national corporation in unfair competition, tortuous interference with business relations and defamation lawsuit. • Litco International v
- Movers Specialty Services (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.) (2011)
- Served as expert and local counsel in patent and trademark infringement lawsuit involving washing machine transport devices. • J4 Promotions v
- Splash Dogs, LLC (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.) (2011)
- Served as expert co-counsel in copyright infringement, unfair competition, trade libel and tortious interference lawsuit between competitors in the sport of canine dog-jumping. • Biltmore Exteriors v
- Biltmore Restoration Group (Stark County Court Common Pleas, Ohio) (2011)
- Represented plaintiff in common law trademark and unfair competition lawsuit. • O'Donovan & Associates, Inc. v
- Hudson Insurance Company (Maryland Fed)
- D. Ct.) (2011)
- Represented plaintiff in lawsuit alleging violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act and Electronic Communications Privacy Act. • Renewable Lubricants Inc. v
- United Bio Lube (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.) (2010)
- Served as lead counsel for plaintiff in trademark infringement, unfair competition, cyber-squatting and defamation litigation. • Heat Surge v
- Twin Star International (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.) (2010)
- Represented defendant in an unfair competition, trade libel and trademark and trade dress infringement lawsuit. • National Biological Corporation v
- The Richmond Light Company (Ohio Fed
- D. Ct.) (2010)
- Represented patent holder in infringement lawsuit which resulted in termination of sales of infringing products. • Accenture Global Services, Ltd. v
- Ascenture Hotel Group (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board) (2010)
- Represented trademark applicant in United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark opposition proceedings. • Labnet v
- Quintalone & Associates (Colo
- Fed
- D. Ct.) (2009)
- Represented federal trademark holder in trademark infringement and cyber-squatting lawsuit. • Labnet v
- Berry & Berry (Colo
- Fed
- D. Ct.) (2009)
- Represented client in trademark infringement and cyber-squatting lawsuit. • Data-Basics v
- Field Fusion (Cuyahoga Court Common Pleas, Ohio) (2009)
- Represented defendants in a trade secret misappropriation lawsuit regarding tablet software applications. • Bridgestone Americas Tire Operations v
- Linglong Tire, Inc. (Trademark Trial and Appeal Board) (2009)
- Represented trademark applicant in United States Patent and Trademark Office trademark opposition proceedings. • Labnet v
- Brictson & Cohn (Colo
- Fed
- D. Ct.) (2008)
- Represented federal trademark holder in trademark infringement and cyber-squatting lawsuit resolved by entry of injunction and transfer of domain names. • Labnet v
- George Henderson Law (Colo
- Fed
- D. Ct.) (2008)
- George Henderson Law Corp. v
- Labnet (Cal
- Fed
- D. Ct.) (2009)
- Represented plaintiff, and declaratory judgment defendant, in federal trademark infringement and cyber-squatting cases. • Hypertherm, Inc. v
- American Torch Tip (New Hamp)
- Fed
- D. Ct.) (2008)
- Served as co-counsel for defendant in patent infringement lawsuit regarding plasma torch devices and components
- Publications & Speaking Engagements USPTO Requires U.S
- Licensed Attorney for Foreign Trademark Applicants and Registrants July 23, 2019 The Power of PI: International Trademark Litigation Tactics, Preliminary Injunctions, and Other U.S
- Trademark Enforcement Strategies April 07, 2016 The Changing Landscape of Patent Litigation: How Expanded Post-Grant Review Proceedings, Federal Rules Changes, And Case Law Developments Are Impacting Patent Litigation and Prosecution Strategies 2016 "Evolving Standards for the Patentability of Life Sciences Inventions," Nathan B. Webb July 02, 2015
Practice Areas Explained
Nathan B. Webb's Areas of Practice
Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Nathan B. Webb handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.
Nathan B. Webb is one of 20,749 patent attorneys indexed nationally. Browse patent attorneys in Ohio →
Nathan B. Webb is one of 23,222 trademark attorneys indexed nationally. Browse trademark attorneys in Ohio →
IP attorneys protect inventions, brands, and creative work through patent prosecution, trademark registration, copyright, and trade-secret enforcement.
Nathan B. Webb is one of 106,079 ip attorneys indexed nationally. Browse ip attorneys in Ohio →
Nathan B. Webb is one of 6,644 trade secrets attorneys indexed nationally. Browse trade secrets attorneys in Ohio →
Nathan B. Webb is one of 2,744 ip licensing attorneys indexed nationally. Browse ip licensing attorneys in Ohio →
Jurisdictional Context
Why local counsel matters in Ohio
Practicing law in Ohio. Legal matters in Ohio are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Cleveland are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate Ohio state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in Ohio brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in Ohio courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.
Looking for additional Ohio attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Cleveland or all attorneys in Ohio.
Frequently Asked
Common questions about Nathan B. Webb
Where is Nathan B. Webb's law office located?
What practice areas does Nathan B. Webb handle?
How long has Nathan B. Webb practiced law?
Where did Nathan B. Webb go to law school?
How can I contact Nathan B. Webb for a consultation?
Practice Areas
Education
Bar Admissions
Reviews
No reviews yet.