Please sign in or create a free account to schedule a consultation.
Atty. Scott A. Ginsberg

Atty. Scott A. Ginsberg

Scott Ginsberg is a member of the Casualty Department with extensive experience defending numerous insurance carriers in disputes involving New York Personal Injury Protection claims. He also helps clients develop strategies for defending complex litigation related to medical provider fraud.

New York New York 23 yrs experience 23 year
Call (212) 376-6405 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Scott A. Ginsberg at a glance

Scott A. Ginsberg is a Shareholder based in New York, New York, practicing at Marshall Dennehey. They have 23+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 2003. Their practice focuses on personal injury and consumer. Admitted to practice in New Jersey (2003), New York (2004), U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York (2004), and U.S. District Court Southern District of New York (2004). Educated at Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University (J.D., 2003) and University of Florida B.S. Psychology University of Florida B.S. Criminology & Law University of Florida (B.A. Psychology, 2000). Active member of Associations & Memberships •Career Services Alumni Committee (CSAC) Member, Maurice A and Deane School of Law at Hofstra University. Serands clients in New York, NY and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

  • Scott Ginsberg is a member of the Casualty Department with extensive experience defending numerous insurance carriers in disputes involving New York Personal Injury Protection claims
  • He also helps clients develop strategies for defending complex litigation related to medical provider fraud
  • As a seasoned litigator with extensive trial and motion practice experience, Scott is highly regarded for his combination of creativity, strategic judgment and courtroom prowess
  • Scott also handles matters as a member of the Fraud/Special Investigation Practice Group
  • He focuses on fraud investigation, primarily dealing with evaluating both medical provider fraud and intentional/staged losses
  • Scott also has significant experience conducting Examinations Under Oath as it relates to both specific claims and broader SIU investigations
  • Prior to joining Marshall Dennehey, Scott managed his own firm for several years where he focused primarily on New York personal injury protection claims
  • Additionally, he developed experience litigating all aspects of insurance defense, premises liability, construction and labor law, vehicular negligence and homeowners' claims
  • Scott earned his juris doctor from the Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University, where he served as an Editor for the Family Court Review
  • Scott earned a B.S. in Psychology and a B.A. in Criminology & Law from the University of Florida, where also he served as the president of the Criminology & Law Honor Society
  • He is admitted in the states of New York and New Jersey
  • Results Failure to Provide Requisite Statutorily Required Medical Assignment-of-Benefits Form results in Dismissal of New York No-Fault Arbitration Matter We successfully defended and submitted post-hearing arguments and secured dismissal of a New York no-fault arbitration matter
  • The applicant, a major medical provider, filed an arbitration matter in the amount of $361,601.62, claiming our client owed it for the claimant’s unpaid medical bills following a major motor vehicle accident
  • The claimant had been involved in the motor vehicle accident and sought payment for medical treatment for a series of treatments rendered while hospitalized, post-accident
  • Counsel for the medical provider argued that the medical billing was never properly nor timely denied, therefore, payment of the claims was overdue
  • However, we successfully argued at the arbitration hearing that the applicant’s client failed to provide the requisite statutorily required medical assignment-of-benefits form, assigning the hospital the right to sue on behalf of the injured party
  • After arguments were heard, the arbitrator ordered post-hearing submissions to be filed by both sides
  • After researching, drafting and filing a post-hearing submission, the arbitrator ruled in our client’s favor, thereby dismissing the matter based on the applicant’s total failure to submit the requisite form, saving our client hundreds of thousands of dollars
  • Dismissals of Multiple New York No-Fault/PIP Arbitrations The arbitrations were commenced by medical providers against the respondent-carrier for non-payment of medical bills insofar as the policyholder and the claimant engaged in material misrepresentation in the procurement of the policy, and in the presentation of the claim
  • We submitted a defense brief that included numerous exhibits, including examination under oath transcripts, an affidavit from the respondent-carrier’s underwriting department and screenshots of insurance premium payments from the claimant to the policyholder
  • At the hearings, the defense argued that the respondent-carrier owed no duty of coverage insofar as the policyholder and the claimant engaged in material misrepresentation in the procurement of the policy and in the presentation of the claim
  • Specifically, the policyholder fraudulently obtained an insurance policy with the respondent-carrier on behalf of the claimant
  • The misrepresentation was deemed “material” insofar as the respondent-carrier would have charged a higher premium based on the actual garaging location of the insured vehicle and, moreover, would not have otherwise insured the claimant
  • The arbitrator held that the respondent-carrier established, by a preponderance of credible evidence, that the instant loss involved fraud and misrepresentation in the procurement of the insurance policy
  • the policyholders’ misrepresentation with regard to the ownership, operation and garaging of the insured vehicle was material
  • the respondent-carrier would not have issued the policy if the facts had been disclosed by the policyholders, and that the respondent-carrier was justified in denying the claim

Practice Areas Explained

Scott A. Ginsberg's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Scott A. Ginsberg handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Personal Injury

Personal injury attorneys help accident victims recover compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain & suffering. Most work on contingency — no fee unless you win.

Scott A. Ginsberg is one of 264,852 personal injury attorneys indexed nationally. Browse personal injury attorneys in New York →

Consumer Protection

Consumer protection attorneys for fraud, lemon law, debt harassment, and deceptive trade practices.

Scott A. Ginsberg is one of 50,607 consumer attorneys indexed nationally. Browse consumer attorneys in New York →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in New York

Practicing law in New York. Legal matters in New York are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in New York are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate New York state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in New York brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in New York courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional New York attorneys? Browse all attorneys in New York or all attorneys in New York.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Scott A. Ginsberg

Where is Scott A. Ginsberg's law office located?
Scott A. Ginsberg's law practice is located in New York, New York. The firm is Marshall Dennehey. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Scott A. Ginsberg handle?
Scott A. Ginsberg focuses on personal injury, consumer. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in New York.
How long has Scott A. Ginsberg practiced law?
Scott A. Ginsberg has 23+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 2003.
Where did Scott A. Ginsberg go to law school?
Scott A. Ginsberg earned their education at (J.D., 2003); (B.A. Psychology, 2000).
How can I contact Scott A. Ginsberg for a consultation?
You can contact Scott A. Ginsberg directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.

Education

J.D.
Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University
- 2003
B.A. Psychology
University of Florida B.S. Psychology University of Florida B.S. Criminology & Law University of Florida
- 2000

Bar Admissions

New Jersey
Admitted: 2003
New York
Admitted: 2004
U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York
Admitted: 2004
U.S. District Court Southern District of New York
Admitted: 2004

Reviews

These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.