Atty. Stanley Jay Diamond

Atty. Stanley Jay Diamond

Stanley Jay Diamond is a lawyer practicing entertainment law, music recording law, motion picture law and 3 other areas of law. Stanley received a A.B. degree from University of California at Los Angeles in 1949, and has been licensed for 73 years.

Los Angeles Los Angeles 73 yrs experience 73 year
Call (833) 693-2361 Book Appointment

Profile Summary

About Stanley Jay Diamond at a glance

Stanley Jay Diamond is a Member based in Los Angeles, California, practicing at Diamond And Wilson. They have 73+ years of legal experience, licensed to practice since 1953. Their practice focuses on entertainment. Admitted to practice in California (1953) and U.S. Supreme Court (1971). Educated at University of Southern California (J.D., 1952) and University of California at Los Angeles (A.B., 1949). Recognitions include AV Preeminent. Active member of Beverly Hills, Los Angeles County and American Bar Associations State Bar of California American Judicature Society. Serands clients in Los Angeles, CA and the surrounding metropolitan area.

Verified attorney profile · Updated June 2026

About

  • Stanley Jay Diamond is a lawyer practicing entertainment law, music recording law, motion picture law and 3 other areas of law
  • Stanley received a A.B. degree from University of California at Los Angeles in 1949, and has been licensed for 73 years
  • Stanley practices at Diamond & Wilson in Los Angeles, CA

Practice Areas Explained

Stanley Jay Diamond's Areas of Practice

Each practice area below reflects the types of cases Stanley Jay Diamond handles, with a brief overview of what that area of law covers.

Entertainment & Sports Law

Entertainment lawyers for music, film, sports contracts, talent representation, and IP licensing.

Stanley Jay Diamond is one of 45,946 entertainment attorneys indexed nationally. Browse entertainment attorneys in California →

Jurisdictional Context

Why local counsel matters in California

Practicing law in California. Legal matters in California are governed by state-specific rules of civil and criminal procedure, statutes of limitations, and substantive law. Cases originating in Los Angeles are typically filed in the local municipal court or the appropriate California state district court, depending on subject matter and amount in controversy. An attorney licensed in California brings working knowledge of local procedural deadlines, judicial practices in this andnue, and the substantive law that applies to cases brought here. Out-of-state attorneys generally cannot represent clients in California courts without local counsel or pro hac vice admission.

Looking for additional California attorneys? Browse all attorneys in Los Angeles or all attorneys in California.

Frequently Asked

Common questions about Stanley Jay Diamond

Where is Stanley Jay Diamond's law office located?
Stanley Jay Diamond's law practice is located in Los Angeles, California. The firm is Diamond And Wilson. You can contact the office directly through this profile page.
What practice areas does Stanley Jay Diamond handle?
Stanley Jay Diamond focuses on entertainment. Each practice area listed reflects experience handling cases of that type in California.
How long has Stanley Jay Diamond practiced law?
Stanley Jay Diamond has 73+ years of legal experience and has been licensed since 1953.
Where did Stanley Jay Diamond go to law school?
Stanley Jay Diamond earned their education at (J.D., 1952); (A.B., 1949).
How can I contact Stanley Jay Diamond for a consultation?
You can contact Stanley Jay Diamond directly through this profile page. Click "Ask the Attorney" to submit a question, or "Schedule a Consultation" to book a meeting. Most claimed-profile attorneys respond within one business day.
What awards or recognition has Stanley Jay Diamond received?
Stanley Jay Diamond's notable recognition includes: AV Preeminent.

Education

J.D.
University of Southern California
- 1952
A.B.
University of California at Los Angeles
- 1949

Awards

AV Preeminent

Bar Admissions

California
Admitted: 1953
U.S. Supreme Court
Admitted: 1971

Reviews

5.0
1 Review
5 0
4 0
3 0
2 0
1 0
These reviews belong to platform users; they do not constitute advertisement or promotion for the attorney. Opinions are published for informational purposes only.

No reviews yet.