Find court opinions that match your case.

Remanded Intellectual Property 1853

Corning v. Burden

Erastus Corning and John F. Winslow, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Peter A. Burden. In a suit brought for an infringement of a patent-right, the defendant ought to bo allowed to give in evidence the patent under which he claims, although junior t

56 U.S. 252 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Brooks v. Fiske

Artemas L. Brooks, Ignatius Tyler, William W. Woodworth, as Administrator of William Woodworth, deceased, and also as Grantee, and James G. Wilson, Appellants, v. John Fiske and Nicholas G. Norcross, doing business under the firm of Fiske &

56 U.S. 212 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

Phelps v. Mayer

Elijah Phelps, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob Mayer. In order to make a bill of exceptions valid, it must appear by the transcript not only that the instructions were given or refused at the trial, but also that the party who complains of the

56 U.S. 160 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1853

Smith v. Ely

Francis O. J. Smith, Plaintiff, v. Heman B. Ely, Henry O’Reilly, Robert W. McCoy, Thomas Moodie, Michael B. Bateham, Lincoln Goodale, Wray Thomas, Albert B. Buttles and Robert Neil. The preceding case of O’Keilly and Morse having settled th

56 U.S. 137 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1853

O'Reilly v. Morse

Henry O’Reilly, Eugene L. Whitman, and W. F. B. Hastings, Appellants, v. Samuel F. B. Morse, Alfred Vail, and Francis O. J. Smith. Morse was the first and original inventor of the electro-magnetic telegraph, for which a patent was issued to

56 U.S. 62 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1853

United States v. Roselius

The United States, Appellants, v. Christian Roselius, Abial D. Crossman, William E. Liveridge, Francois B. D’Autuin, Benjamin C. Howard, John Spear Smith, Brantz Mayer, John Gibson, and R. R. Gurley, Executors of John McDonogh, deceased. Un

56 U.S. 31 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1852

Boyden v. Burke

Uriah A. Boyden, Plaintiff in error, v. Edmund Burke. Where an action was brought against the Commissioner of Patents for refusing to give copies of papers in his office, and no special damage was set out in the declaration, evidence of the

55 U.S. 575 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1852

Bloomer v. McQuewan

Elisha Bloomer, Appellant, v. John W. McQuewan, Allen R. McQuewan, and Samuel Douglas, Partners, under the name of McQuewans & Douglas. The patent for Woodworth’s planing machine was extended from 1842 to 1843, bjr the Board of Commissioner

55 U.S. 539 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1852

Marsh v. Brooks

Samuel Marsh, William E. Lee, and Edward C. Delavan, Plaintiffs in error, v. Edward Brooks, and Virginia C. his wife, Charles P. Billon, and Francis E. his wife, Walter G. Reddick, and Dabney C. Reddick. This court decided, in 8. Howard, 22

55 U.S. 513 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1852

Cunningham v. Ashley

Matthew Cunningham, Plaintiff in error, v. Mary W. W. Ashley, executrix, and sole Legatee of Chester Ashley, deceased, and William E. Ashley, Frances A. Ashley, (now Frances A. Freeman,) and Henry W. Ashley, by Mary W W. Ashley, his guardia

55 U.S. 377 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1852

Silsby v. Foote

Horace C. Silsby, Washburn Race, Abel Downs, Henry Herrion, and Charles D. Thompson, v. Elisha Foote. Upon a trial in New York, a. juror became ill, and was discharged before any evidence Was given, and before the plaintiffs’ counsel had' c

55 U.S. 218 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1852

Le Roy v. Tatham

Thomas Otis Le Roy, and David Smith, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Benjamin Tatham, Junior, George N. Tatham, and Henry B. Tatham. In a patent for improvements upon the maclunery used for making .pipes and tubes from lead, or tin, when in a set,

55 U.S. 156 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1852

Rundle v. Delaware & Raritan Canal Co.

George Rundle and William Griffiths, Trustees of the Estate of John Savage, deceased, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the Delaware and Raritan Canal Company. Bjr tic law of Pennsylvania, the Biver Delaware is a public navigable river, held by its j

55 U.S. 80 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1851

Howard v. Ingersoll

John H. Howard, Plaintiff in error, v. Stephen M. Ingersoll ; John H. Howard and Josephus Eckolls, Plaintiffs in error, v. Stephen M. Ingersoll. In 1802, when Georgia ceded her .back lands to the United States, she had jurisdiction over the

54 U.S. 381 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1851

McCormick v. Gray

Cyrus H. McCormick, Appellant, Charles M. Gray, and William B. Ogden. Where two partners assigned ail. their partnership property to a trustee with certain instrpetions how to dispose of it, and afterwards agreed between themselves to appoi

54 U.S. 26 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1851

Ballance v. Forsyth

Charles Ballance, Plaintiff in error, v. Robert Forsyth, Lucien Dumain, and Anthony R. Bovis. On the 15th of May, 1820, Congress passed an act (3 Stat. at . Large, 605,) for the benefit of the inhabitants of the village of Peoria, by which

54 U.S. 18 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1851

Lessieur v. Price

Godfrey Lessieur, Abram Augustine and Mary W. his Wife, Thomas H. Dawson, Richard J. Watson and Sarah his Wife, and Palmelia E. Dawson, Laura A. Dawson and George W. Dawson, Infants, by Thomas H. Dawson their Guardian, Plaintiffs in Error,

53 U.S. 59 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1851

Thredgill v. Pintard

Joseph P. Thredgill, Administrator of Archibald Goodloe, deceased, Appellant, v. John M. Pintard. Where a settler upon -the public lands had a pre-emption right to them and sold them to a person who again sold them to a third party, the ori

53 U.S. 24 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Bennett v. Butterworth

John H. Bennett, Plaintiff in error, v. Samuel F. Butterworth. In Texas, the common law has been adopted, but the forms and rules of pleading in common law cases have not; and although the forms of proceedings and practice in the State cour

52 U.S. 669 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Mayor of Philadelphia

The United States, Appellants, v. The Mayor, Aldermen, and Inhabitants of the Cities of Philadelphia and New Orleans. The decision of this court in the United States v. Eeynes (9 Howard, 127), again affirmed, to wit, that under the acts of

52 U.S. 609 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Power's Heirs

The United States, Appellants, v. Thomas Power’s Heirs. The twelfth section of the regulations of O’Reilly in 17.70 required, that there should be .an order of survey, a proces verbal by1 the surveyor of the province, three copies of the pl

52 U.S. 570 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Hughes

The United States, Appellants, v. David M. Hughes, Robert Sewall, and Franklin Hudson, a Minor, by his Tutor, Holmes Hutchinson. Where a person entered land according to law, but omitted to obtain a patent for it, and another person afterwa

52 U.S. 552 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Moore v. Brown

Joshua J. Moore, Plaintiff, v. James Brown, Alfred Brown, Harmon Hogan, and Joseph Froward. According to the statute of limitations passed by the State of Illinois, a defendant in ejectment who had been in possession of the land by actual r

52 U.S. 414 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Den v. Baskerville

John Den, Lessee of Polly Weatherhead, Plaintiff in error, v. John Baskerville, John White, John Parker, Peter Haynes, William Stewart, Nancy Stewart, Nelson B. Turner, Jacob Gallaspie, Peter Bryson, Benjamin Parrish, William Johnson, Reube

52 U.S. 329 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion