Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Van Rensselaer v. Kearney

Jeremiah Van Rensselaer, Appellant, v. Philip Kearney and Frederic De Peyster, Trustees and Executors of John Watts, deceased, Catherine G. Visscher, Cornelius G. Van Rensselaer, and Glen Van Rensselaer, Defendants. In 1786 the legislature

52 U.S. 297 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Hotchkiss v. Greenwood

Julia P. Hotchkiss, Executrix of John G. Hotchkiss, deceased, John A. Davenport, and John W. Quincy, Plaintiffs in error, v. Miles Greenwood and Thomas Wood, Partners in Trade under the name of M. Greenwood & Co. A patent granted for a “ ne

52 U.S. 248 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Boisdoré

The United States, Appellants, v. Etienne Alphonso Boisdoré, Laurent Boisdoré, Sidney Boisdoré, Mathilde and Alerine Nicolas, Widow of Manuel Fabre Danony, Caroline Nicolas, Elise Nicolas, Joseph Manuel de Labarre, Delphine Victoire de Laba

52 U.S. 63 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Girault

The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. James A. Girault, William M. Gwin, Hay Battle Harrison, and Alexander J. McMurtry. Where an action was brought by the United States upon the official bond of a receiver of public money, a plea that

52 U.S. 22 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Robinson v. Minor

Merritt M. Robinson and Marguerite his Wife, Aurore Gayoso, Fernando Gayoso, and Felicite Gayoso, Appellants, v. Wm. J. Minor, James C. Wilkins, and Henry Chotard, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Katharine Minor, deceased, Franc

51 U.S. 627 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Gayler v. Wilder

Charles J. Gayler and Leonard Brown, Plaintiffs in error, v. Benjamin G. Wilder. After a case has been decided, and judgment pronounced by this court, it is too late to move to open the judgment for the purpose of amending the bill of excep

51 U.S. 509 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Brooks

The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. Jehiel Brooks and others, Defendants. A supplementary article to a treaty between the United States and the Caddo Indians', providing that certain persons “ shall have their right to the said four

51 U.S. 442 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam Packet Co. v. Sickles

The Washington, Alexandria, and Georgetown Steam Packet Company, Plaintiffs in error, v. Frederick E. Sickles and Truman Cook. Where the declaration contained two counts; viz. the first upon a special contract that the plaintiffs had placed

51 U.S. 419 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Landes v. Brant

Isaac Landes, Plaintiff in error, v. Joshua B. Brant. Where the Commissioners who acted under the act of Congress passed on the 3d of March, 1807, for the adjustment of land titles in Missouri, decided in favor of a claim, and issued a cert

51 U.S. 348 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Stimpson v. Baltimore & Susquehanna Railroad

James Stimpson, Plaintiff in error, v. The Baltimore and Susquehanna Railroad Company. Stimpson’s patent “ for an improvement for the purpose of carrying railroads through the streets óf towns, or in other situations where it may be desirab

51 U.S. 329 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Gilmer v. Poindexter

James B. Gilmer, Plaintiff in error, v. George Poindexter. On the 30th of January, 1835, Poindexter purchased from Thomas a right of entry in certain lands in Louisiana, with authority to locate the lands in the name of Thomas, and they wer

51 U.S. 257 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Hallett v. Collins

William R. Hallett and Robert L. Walker, Executors of Joshua Kennedy, deceased, John G. Aikin and Clarissa his Wife, John H. Hastie and his Wife Secluda, Augustus R. Meslier and his Wife, Mary Augusta Kennedy, Joshua Kennedy, James Inerarit

51 U.S. 174 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Wilson v. Sandford

James G. Wilson, Appellant, v. George A. Sandford and Robert G. Musgrove. The seventeenth section of the act of 1836 gives the right of appeal to this court, when the sum in dispute is below the value of two thousand dollars, “ in all actio

51 U.S. 99 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Goodtitle ex dem. Pollard v. Kibbe

John Goodtitle, ex dem. John Pollard, William Pollard, John Fowler and Harriet, his Wife, late Harriet Pollard, Henry P. Ensign and Phebe, his Wife, late Phebe Pollard, George Huggins and Louisa, his Wife, late Louisa Pollard, Joseph Case a

50 U.S. 471 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1850

Doe ex dem. Barbarie v. Mayor of Mobile

John Doe, ex dem. of Catharine Louisa Barbarie, Ann Billup Barde, Daniel R. Brower and Ann B. Brower, his Wife, Curtis Lewis and Isabella Lewis, his Wife, John T. Lackey and Margaret Lackey, his Wife, Heirs and Legal Representatives of Robe

50 U.S. 451 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1850

Doe ex dem. Barbarie v. Eslava

John Doe, ex dem. of Catharine Louisa Barbarie, Ann Billup Barde, Daniel R. Brower and Ann B. Brower, his Wife, Curtis Lewis and Isabella Lewis, his Wife, John T. Lackey and Margaret Lackey, his Wife, Heirs and Legal Representatives of Robe

50 U.S. 421 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Gaines v. Nicholson

George S. Gaines, Francis S. Lyon and his Wife, Sarah Lyon, James M. Davenport and his Wife, Alethan Davenport, Goodman G. Griffin and his Wife, Willey Ann Griffin, George Frederick Glover, Ann Gaines Glover, Louisa Davenport Glover, Mary T

50 U.S. 356 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Boswell's Lessee v. Otis

Thomas E. Boswell’s Lessee, Plaintiff, v. Lucius B. Otis Administrator, Margaret Dickinson, Widow, and Edward F., Julia S., Margaret O., John B. B., Rodolphus, Martha Jane, and James A. Dickinson, Minor Children, of Rodolphus Dickinson, dec

50 U.S. 336 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Lytle v. Arkansas

Robinson Lytle and Lydia Louisa Lytle, his Wife, Elias Hooper and Mary E. Hooper, his Wife, and Nathan H. Cloyes, a Minor, under twenty-one years of age, by Wiley Clayton, his Guardian, v. The State of Arkansas, William Russell, the Real Es

50 U.S. 314 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

La Roche v. Lessee of Jones

Rene La Roche and Mary, his Wife, Inez R. Ellis, Stephen P. Ellis, and Thomas La Roche Ellis, Minor Heirs of Thomas G. Ellis, deceased, by their Guardian ad litem, Charles G. Dahlgren, Plaintiffs in error, v. The Lessee of Richard Jones and

50 U.S. 155 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Wilson v. Simpson

James G. Wilson, Appellant, v. Andrew P. Simpson, E. E. Simpson, Joseph Forsyth, and Bagdad Mills. The documents showing the title to Woodworth’s planing-machine are set forth in extenso in 4 Howard, 647, et seq. The assignment from Woodwor

50 U.S. 109 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Mills v. County of St. Clair

Adam L. Mills, John H. Gay, Charles Mullikin, John O’Fallon, William C. Wiggins, Andrew Christy, Elizabeth Christy, Mary F. Christy, Melanie Christy, which Melanie is the Widow, and which said Elizabeth Christy and Mary F. Christy are the o

49 U.S. 569 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Williamson v. Berry

Charles A. Williamson and Catharine, his Wife, Plaintiffs, v. Joseph Berry Maty Clarke devised to Benjamin Moore and Charity, his wife, and Elizabeth Maunsell, and their heirs for ever, as joint tenants, and not as tenants in common, “all t

49 U.S. 495 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Le Roy v. Beard

Jacob Le Roy, Plaintiff in error, v. William Beard. By the laws of Wisconsin, where the contract in question was made, a scroll or any device by way of seal has the same effect as an actual seal. But in New York it is otherwise, and an acti

49 U.S. 451 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion