Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pregis Corp. v. Kappos
PREGIS CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Cross Appellant, v. David J. KAPPOS, Undersecretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Defendants-Appellees, and Free-Flow Packaging International, In
In re Baxter International, Inc.
In re BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. No. 2011-1073. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 26, 2012. William F. Lee, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, MA, filed a combined petition for panel rehearing and reh
Flo Healthcare Solutions, LLC v. Kappos
FLO HEALTHCARE SOLUTIONS, LLC, Appellant, v. David J. KAPPOS, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Appellee, and Rioux Vision, Inc., Appellee. No. 2011-1476. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 23, 2012. Ge
Technology Patents LLC v. T-Mobile (UK) Ltd.
TECHNOLOGY PATENTS LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T-MOBILE (UK) LTD., T-Mobile Austria GmbH, T-Mobile Czech Republic A.S., T-Mobile Deutschland GmbH, T-Mobile Hungary Co. Ltd., T-Mobile Netherlands B.V., and T-Mobile Slovensko A.S., Defendant
In re Miracle Tuesday, LLC
In re MIRACLE TUESDAY, LLC. No. 2011-1373. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 4, 2012. Paul D. Supnik, of Beverly Hills, CA, argued for appellant. Christina J. Hieber, Associate Solicitor, United States Patent and Tradema
Belkin International, Inc. v. Kappos
BELKIN INTERNATIONAL, INC., Cisco Linksys L.L.C., D-Link Systems, Inc., and Netgear, Inc., Appellants, v. David J. KAPPOS, Director, United States Patent and Trademark Office, Appellee, and Optimumpath, LLC, Appellee. 2012-1090. Reexaminati
In re Abbott Diabetes Care Inc.
In re ABBOTT DIABETES CARE INC. Nos. 2011-1516, 2011-1517. Reexamination Nos. 90/007,903, 90/007,910. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 28, 2012. Gregory A. Castanias, Jones Day, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant.
Christian Louboutin S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc.
CHRISTIAN LOUBOUTIN S.A., Christian Louboutin, L.L.C., Christian Louboutin, Plaintiffs-Counter-Defendants-Appellants, v. YVES SAINT LAURENT AMERICA HOLDING, INC., Yves Saint Laurent S.A.S., Yves Saint Laurent America, Inc., Defendants-Count
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.
AKAMAI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, and The Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. LIMELIGHT NETWORKS, INC., Defendant-Cross Appellant. and McKesson Technologies, Inc. (formerly McKesson Information Solut
In re Applied Materials, Inc.
In re APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. Nos. 2011-1461, 2011-1462, 2011-1463, 2011-1464. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 29, 2012. John A. Dragseth, Fish & Richardson P.C., of Minneapolis, MN, argued for appellant. With him on t
Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
The ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, The American College of Medical Genetics, The American Society for Clinical Pathology, The College of American Pathologists, Haig Kazazian, MD, Arupa Ganguly, PhD, Wendy Chung, MD, PhD, Harry Ostrer,
In re Rambus Inc.
In re RAMBUS INC. No. 2011-1247. Reexamination No. 90/010,420. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 15, 2012. J. Michael Jakes, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. O
In re Beineke
In re Walter F. BEINEKE. Nos. 2011-1459, 2011-1460. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 6, 2012. Alice 0. Martin, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, of Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. With her on the brief were James R. Burdett a
In re Antor Media Corp.
In re ANTOR MEDIA CORPORATION. No. 2011-1465. Reexamination Nos. 90/007,839, 90/007,936, 90/007,942, 90/007,957, 90/009,261. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 27, 2012. Thomas A. Lewry, Brooks Kushman, P.C., of Southfiel
Intercollegiate Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Copyright Royalty Board
INTERCOLLEGIATE BROADCASTING SYSTEM, INC., a Rhode Island Non-Profit Corporation, Appellant v. COPYRIGHT ROYALTY BOARD and Library of Congress, Appellees College Broadcasters, Inc. and SoundExchange, Inc., Intervenors. No. 11-1083. United S
In re Mouttet
In re Blaise Laurent MOUTTET. No. 2011-1451. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 26, 2012. Blaise Laurent Mouttet, of Arlington, Virginia, pro se. Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of A
R+L Carriers, Inc. v. DriverTech LLC
In re BILL OF LADING TRANSMISSION AND PROCESSING SYSTEM PATENT LITIGATION. R+L Carriers, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DriverTech LLC, Defendant-Appellee, and PeopleNet Communications Corporation, Qualcomm, Inc., and Microdea, Inc., Defenda
Mintz v. Dietz & Watson, Inc.
Neil MINTZ and JIF-PAK Manufacturing, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Marcus Mintz, Plaintiff, v. DIETZ & WATSON, INC. and Package Concepts & Materials, Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 2010-1341. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Cir
In re Suong-Hyu Hyon
In re SUONG-HYU HYON and Masanori Oka. No. 2011-1239. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 24, 2012. George D. Moustakas, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, PLC, of Troy, MI, argued for appellant. With him on the brief was David L. S
In re Baxter International, Inc.
In re BAXTER INTERNATIONAL, INC. No. 2011-1073. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 17, 2012. William F. Lee, Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for the appellant. With him on the brief were W
Gardner v. Kappos
No. 11-1195. Gardner v. Kappos, Director, Patent and Trademark Office.
In re Youman
In re Roger YOUMAN and Marney Morris. No. 2011-1136. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 8, 2012. Laurence S. Rogers, Ropes & Gray, LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was Pristine Johan
In re Montgomery
In re Hugh Edward MONTGOMERY, John Francis Martin, and Jorge Daniel Erusalimsky. No. 2011-1376. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 8, 2012. J. Mark Pohl, Pharmaceutical Patent Attorneys, LLC, of Morristown, NJ, argued for
Kappos v. Hyatt
KAPPOS, UNDER SECRETARY OF COMMERCE FOR INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND DIRECTOR, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE v. HYATT No. 10-1219. Argued January 9, 2012 Decided April 18, 2012 Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Sotomayor,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.