Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Eurand, Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
In re CYCLOBENZAPRINE HYDROCHLORIDE EXTENDED-RELEASE CAPSULE PATENT LITIGATION. Eurand, Inc. (Now Known as Aptalis Pharmatech, Inc.), Cephalon, Inc., and Anesta AG, Plaintiffs-Cross Appellants, v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc.,
In re Becton, Dickinson & Co.
In re BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY. No. 2011-1111. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 12, 2012. Richard Z. Lehv, Fross, Zelnivk, Lehrman & Zissu, of New York, NY, argued for the appellant. Christina J. Hieber, Associate
Rosetta Stone Ltd. v. Google, Inc.
ROSETTA STONE LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GOOGLE, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee. The UK Intellectual Property Law Society, Amicus Curiae, Eric Goldman; Public Citizen; Martin Schwimmer, Limited Intervenors. International Trademark Asso
In re the Chamber of Commerce of the United States
In re The CHAMBER OF COMMERCE OF THE UNITED STATES of America. No. 2011-1330. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. April 3, 2012. William M. Merone, Kenyon & Kenyon, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the
United States Department of Commerce, Patent & Trademark Office v. Federal Labor Relations Authority
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Petitioner v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent. Patent Office Professional Association, Intervenor. No. 11-1019. United States Court of Appeals, District of Col
In re Viterra Inc.
In re VITERRA INC. No. 2011-1354. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 6, 2012. Scot A. Duvall, Middleton & Reutlinger, of Louisville, Kentucky, for appellant. Raymond T. Chen, Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark
In re Staats
In re Erik P. STAATS and Robin D. Lash. No. 2010-1443. Serial No. 11/503,541. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. March 5, 2012. John M. Whealan, of Silver Spring, Maryland, argued for appellants. Of counsel on the brief were J
Golan v. Holder
GOLAN et al. v. HOLDER, ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al. No. 10-545. Argued October 5, 2011 Decided January 18, 2012 Anthony T. Falzone argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Julie A. Ahrens, Daniel K. Nazer, Hugh Q. Gottscha
In re Construction Equipment Co.
In re CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT COMPANY. No. 2010-1507. Reexamination No. 90/008,447. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Dec. 8, 2011. As Corrected Dec. 15, 2011. Peter E. Heuser, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt PC, of Portland, OR, a
Synopsys, Inc. v. Ricoh Co.
In re RICOH COMPANY, LTD. PATENT LITIGATION. Synopsys, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Defendant-Appellant. Ricoh Company, Ltd., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Aeroflex Incorporated, AMI Semiconductor, Inc., Matrox Electronic Sys
In re Stepan Co.
In re STEPAN COMPANY. No. 2010-1261. Reexamination Nos. 90/006,824, 90/007,619. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Oct. 5, 2011. Thomas J. Wimbiscus, McAndrews, Held & Malloy, Ltd. of Chicago, Illinois, argued for appellant. W
In re Leithem
In re Phyllis LEITHEM, Charles A. Kremers, W. Paul Harrell, Stephen Lewis, Karl D. Sears, Quan He, and Peter R. Abitz. No. 2011-1030. Serial No. 09/863,585. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Sept. 19, 2011. William J. Spatz,
In re Aoyama
In re Keisuke AOYAMA, Kojiro Toyoshima, and Yoshitaka Ezaki. No. 2010-1552. Serial No. 10/798,505. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 29, 2011. Christopher J. Rourk, Jackson Walker, L.L.P., of Dallas, TX, argued for the a
Muchnick v. Thomson Corp.
In re LITERARY WORKS IN ELECTRONIC DATABASES COPYRIGHT LITIGATION Irvin Muchnick, Abraham Zaleznik, Charles Schwartz, Jack Sands, Todd Pitock, Judith Stacey, Judith Trotsky, Christopher Goodrich, Kathy Glicken and Anita Bartholomew, Objecto
In re NTP, Inc.
In re NTP, INC. Nos. 2010-1243, 2010-1254, 2010-1263, 2010-1274, 2010-1275, 2010-1276, 2010-1278. Reexamination Nos. 90/006,676, 90/006,-494, 90/006,681, 90/007,726, 90/006,491, 90/006,678, 90/007,723, 90/006,533, 90/006,675, 90/007,731, 90
In re NTP, Inc.
In re NTP, INC. No. 2010-1277. Reexamination Nos. 90/006,495 and 95/000,020. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 1, 2011. Brian M. Buroker and Ozzie A. Fames, Hunton & Williams, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant
Association for Molecular Pathology v. United States Patent & Trademark Office
The ASSOCIATION FOR MOLECULAR PATHOLOGY, the American College of Medical Genetics, the American Society for Clinical Pathology, the College of American Pathologists, Haig Kazazian, MD, Arupa Ganguly, PhD, Wendy Chung, MD, PhD, Harry Ostrer,
In re Lovin
In re Jeff LOVIN, Robert Adams, and Dan Kuruzar. No. 2010-1499. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. July 22, 2011. James R. Burdett, Barnes & Thornburg, LLP, of Washington, DC, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were R
Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
MICROSOFT CORP. v. i4i LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al. No. 10-290. Argued April 18, 2011 Decided June 9, 2011 Thomas G. Hungar argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Theodore B. Olson, Matthew D. McGill, Matthew D. Powers,
In re Klein
In re Arnold G. KLEIN. No. 2010-1411. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. June 6, 2011. Louis W. Tompros, Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr, LLP, of Boston, MA, argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Larissa B.
Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson & Co.
THERASENSE, INC. (now known as Abbott Diabetes Care, Inc.) and Abbott Laboratories, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. BECTON, DICKINSON AND COMPANY, and Nova Biomedical Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, and Bayer Healthcare LLC, Defendant-Appellee
Allergan, Inc. v. Exela Pharmsci Inc.
In re BRIMONIDINE PATENT LITIGATION. Allergan, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Exela Pharmsci Inc. and Exela Pharmsci Pvt., Ltd., Defendants-Appellants, and Apotex Inc. and Apotex Corp., Defendants-Appellants. Nos. 2010-1102, 2010-1103. United
In re Huai-Hung Kao
In re HUAI-HUNG KAO, Anand R. Baichwal, Troy McCall, and David Lee In re Huai-Hung Kao, Anand R. Baichwal, Troy McCall, and David Lee In re Harry Ahdieh. Nos. 2010-1307, 2010-1308, 2010-1309. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
In re Mostafazadeh
In re Shahram MOSTAFAZADEH and Joseph O. Smith. No. 2010-1260. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. May 3, 2011. Steve D. Beyer, Beyer Law Group LLP, of Cupertino, CA, argued for appellants. With him on the brief was Edward Van
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.