Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Swearingen
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SWEARINGEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 48. Submitted November 3, 1904.— Decided December 19, 1904. An employé is entitled to assume that his employer has used due care
United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 54. Submitted November 4, 1904. Decided December 12, 1904. Where it does not appear that one claiming* to
Humbird v. Avery
HUMBIRD v. AVERY. CERTIFICATE FROM AND ORDER TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued October 23, 26, 1903. Decided December 12, 1904. The act of Congress of July 1, 1898, 30 Stat. 597, 620, c. 546, relating to
Cramer v. Wilson
CRAMER v. WILSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 47. Submitted November 3, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. Where the trustee in bankruptcy sells the interest of the bankrupt in land, • the purchaser acquires only t
Hill v. McCord
HILL v. McCORD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 49. Argued November 3, 4, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. Where a commutation entry made in good faith after the passage of the act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 1098, w
Baltimore Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Baltimore
BALTIMORE SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY v. BALTIMORE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE' STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 39. Argued November 2, 3, 1994. Decided November 28, 1904. A State may tax different estates in land to the different par
Patterson v. Hewitt
PATTERSON v. HEWITT. APPEAL from the supreme court of the territory of NEW MEXICO. No. 23. Argued October 25, 26, 1904. Decided November 28, 1904. The owners of a mining claim in New Mexico transferred their interests to one of their number
Knepper v. Sands
KNEPPER v. SANDS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 233. Submitted April 19, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. Section 4 of the act of March 3, 1887, 24 Stat. 556, for the adjustment of forfeited railroad g
In re Christensen Engineering Co.
MATTER OF CHRISTENSEN ENGINEERING COMPANY. IN THE SUPREME COURT OP THE UNITED STATES. No. 15, Original. Submitted April 25, 1904. Decided May 31, 1904. When an order imposing a fine for violation of an injunction is substantially one to rei
Hy-Yu-Tse-Mil-Kin v. Smith
HY-YU-TSE-MIL-KIN v. SMITH. APPEAL ER’OM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH . -CIRCUIT. No. 209. Submitted April 12, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. An Indian woman, head of a family of the Walla Walla tribe, having asked under the act
United States v. Anderson
UNITED STATES v. ANDERSON. APPEAL PROM THE COURT, OP CLAIMS.- ' No. 560. Submitted Match 21, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. By the fiction of relation, where thé interest of justice demands it, the legal-title may be held .to relate back to th
Hanks Dental Ass'n v. International Tooth Crown Co.
HANKS DENTAL ASSOCIATION v. INTERNATIONAL TOOTH CROWN COMPANY. ON A CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 253. Argued April 26, 1904. Decided May 16, 1904. The act of March 9, 1892, 27 Stat. 7, in regard
Elder v. Horseshoe Mining & Milling Co.
ELDER v. HORSESHOE MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 220. Submitted April 18, 1904. Decided May 2, 1904. • A notice to a coowner, to contribute his share of development work on a mining
St. Louis Mining & Milling Co. v. Montana Mining Co.
ST. LOUIS MINING AND MILLING COMPANY OF MONTANA v. MONTANA MINING COMPANY, LIMITED. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 250. Submitted April 21, 1904. Decided May 2, 1904. The patent for a lode claim takes th
Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.
CLIPPER MINING COMPANY v. ELI MINING AND LAND COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP COLORADO. No. 76. Argued November 13, 1903. Decided May 2, 1904. This court has no jurisdiction in an action at law to review the conclusions
Damon v. Hawaii
DAMON v. HAWAII. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP HAWAII. No. 207. Argued April 12, 1904. Decided April 25, 1904. A general law may grant titles as well as a special law. The act of Hawaii of 1846, “ of Public and Private Righ
Security Land & Exploration Co. v. Burns
SECURITY LAND AND EXPLORATION COMPANY v. BURNS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 127. Argued January 19,1904. Decided February 29, 1904. The general rule that in matters of boundaries natural monuments or objects wi
United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. • No. 145. Argued January 5,1904. Decided February 23, 1904. 'The act of.July 2, 1864, granting lands to the Northern Paci
United States ex rel. Steinmetz v. Allen
UNITED STATES ex rel. STEINMETZ v. ALLEN. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 383. Argued January 12, 13, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. A rulé of practice in the Patent Office when established by the Commission
United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.
UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA AND OREGON LAND COMPANY. CALIFORNIA AND OREGON LAND COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Nos. 4, 5. Argued March 14, 17, 1902. Reargued Decembe
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Cramer
SINGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CRAMER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 18. Argued March 18, 19, 1903. Decided February 1, 1904. Where it appears from the face of the patents that extrinsic evidence is
Joplin v. Chachere
JOPLIN v. CHACHERE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 96. Argued December 16, 1903. Decided January 4, 1904. An adjudication by commissioners under sec. 4 of the áct of March 3, 1807, amending the act of March 2, 180
Toltec Ranch Co. v. Babcock
TOLTEC RANCH COMPANY v. BABCOCK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP UTAH. No. 49. Argued November 3, 1903. Decided December 21, 1903. Adverse possession under claim of right for the period prescribed by the statute of limitations of
Toltec Ranch Co. v. Cook
TOLTEC RANCH COMPANY v. COOK ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 48. Argued November 3, 1903. Decided December 21, 1903. Adverse possession, gives a title to land together with the remedies which attach to the title as effe
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.