Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
Intellectual Property Cases
2,623 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kirwan v. Murphy
KIRWAN v. MURPHY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 161. Argued January 30, 1903. Decided April 6, 1903. Even if the making of a government survey, which .could be made without any material injury to soil
Kokomo Fence Machine Co. v. Kitselman
KOKOMO FENCE MACHINE COMPANY v. KITSELMAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 148. Argued January 22, 1903. Decided March 23, 1903. Where the patents sued on are not pioneer patents and do not embody a p
Kennedy Mining & Milling Co. v. Argonaut Mining Co.
KENNEDY MINING AND MILLING COMPANY v. ARGONAUT MINING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 49. Argued December 10, 11, 1902. Decided March 9, 1903. Where the contention is that the title to ore taken from a mi
San José Land & Water Co. v. San José Ranch Co.
SAN JOSÉ LAND AND WATER COMPANY v. SAN JOSÉ RANCH COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUFREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 113. Submitted December 2, 1902. Decided March 2, 1903. Although no Federal right, title or immunity was specially set up
Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. Koehne
INDIANA MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. KOEHNE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 177. Argued October 24, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. Certain taxes having been assessed against complainant, an
Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Montana Ore Purchasing Co.
BOSTON AND MONTANA CONSOLIDATED COPPER AND SILVER MINING COMPANY v. MONTANA ORE PURCHASING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 103. Argued December 3,1902. Decided February 23, 1903.
Waggoner v. Flack
WAGGONER v. FLACK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOR THE SECOND SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 28. Argued December 8, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. While this court is not bound by the construction placed by t
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Soderberg
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SODERBERG. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 61. Argued December 12, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. 1. Although the jurisdiction of the United States Circuit Court be o
United States v. Rickert
UNITED STATES v. RICKERT. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 216. Argued January 28, 29,1903. Decided February 23, 1903. By the act of Congress of February 8, 188*7, o. 119, known as the Indian General
Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.
BLEISTEIN v. DONALDSON LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COUKT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCÜIT. No. 117. Argued Decided February 2, 1903. Chromolithographs representing actual groups of persons and things, which have been designe
Beals v. Cone
BEALS v. CONE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 84. Argued November 11,12,1802. Decided January 26, 1903. There is no general right to a writ of error from this court to the courts of a State; nor does the mere fact
Nelson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
NELSON v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 44. Argued October 16,17,1902. Decided January 26, 1903. The.grant of public lands made by the act of July 2, 1864, c. 217, to the Northe
Worden v. California Fig Syrup Co.
WORDEN v. CALIFORNIA FIG SYRUP COMPANY. CERTIORARI TP THE CIRCUIT COURT OF -APPEALS FOR THE NINTH • CIRCUIT. No. 36. Argued March 18, 19, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. When the owner of a trade mark applies for an-injunction to restrain th
Mobile Transportation Co. v. Mobile
MOBILE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. MOBILE. EEEOB TO THE SUPREME C0UET OF THE STATE OF AT.AHAMA. No. 62. Argued November 3, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. 1. A motion to dismiss for want of a Federal question .cannot be sustained when the titl
Cary Manufacturing Co. v. Acme Flexible Clasp Co.
CARY MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. ACME FLEXIBLE CLASP COMPANY. EEEOE TO THE OIECUIT COUET OE APPEALS EOE 'THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 122. Submitted December 17, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. Judgments and decrees of the Circuit Court of Appeals i
Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock
CHEROKEE NATION v. HITCHCOCK. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF. APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 340. Submitted October 23, 1902. Decided December 1, 1902. In an a'ction brought by the Cherokee Nation to enjoin the Secretary of the Interior
Iowa v. Rood
IOWA v. ROOD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 9. Argued October 14, 15, 1902. Decided November 17, 1902. Where the title claimed by the State of Iowa to land formerly the bed of a lake rested solely upon the proposition
Clark v. Herington
CLARK v. HERINGTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 223. Submitted April 14, 1902. — Decided June 2, 1902. While the two statutes making the Únion Pacific Railroad grants did not double the price of the even numbered
Bement v. National Harrow Co.
BEMENT v. NATIONAL HARROW COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 215. Argued April 9, 10, 1902. Decided May 19, 1902. Any one sued upon a contract may set up, as a defence, that it is a violation of an act of Cong
Montana Mining Co. v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.
MONTANA MINING COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. MONTANA MINING COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 213, 214. Argued April 9, 1902.
Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.
CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY v. CAMBRIA IRON COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 17. Argued October 17, 18, 21, 1901. — Decided Decided May 5, 1902. Patent No..404,414, issued Junó 4, 1889, to William R.
Excelsior Wooden Pipe Co. v. Pacific Bridge Co.
EXCELSIOR WOODEN PIPE COMPANY v. PACIFIC BRIDGE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 375. Submitted February 3, 1902. Decided May 5, 1902. Where the decree of a Circuit Court and th
United States v. Green
UNITED STATES v. GREEN. CHRISTIE v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. Nos. 109, 129. Argued January 27, 28,1902. Decided April 28, 1902. The terms of the act of- March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 854, (establishing the Cou
French-Glenn Live Stock Co. v. Springer
FRENCH-GLENN LIVE STOCK COMPANY v. SPRINGER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON. No. 124. Argued January 20, 21, 1902. Decided April 7, 1902. A Federal question was presented by the contentions of the plaintiff in error, and
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.