Outcome n/a 1906

Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al.

Supreme Court of the United States · December 3, 1906 · Docket No. 60

203 U.S. 585

Syllabus

No. 60. Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al. Argued November 15, 1906. Decided December 3, 1906. Mr. George B. Colby and Mr. Charles W. Dayton for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. W. E. Borah for defendants in error.

Full Opinion (588 characters)

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Idaho.
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Swafford v. Templeton, 185 U. S. 487; Butler v. Gage, 138 U. S. 52; Home for Incurables v. City of New York, 187 U. S. 155; Erie Railroad Company v. Purdy, 185 U. S. 148; Ansbro v. United States, 159 U. S. 695; Cornell v. Creen, 163 U. S. 75; Bausman v. Dixon, 173 U. S. 113; Gableman v. Peoria &c. Railway Company, 179 U. S. 335; City of New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Company, 142 U. S. 79; Beals v. Cone, 188 U. S. 184; Speed v. McCarthy, 181 U. S. 269. Case below, 9 Idaho, 53.

Source: Caselaw Access Project (Harvard Law School). This page is informational and is not legal advice.