Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1906 Cases
239 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Thorley v. Pabst Brewing Co.
No. 521. Charles Thorley, Petitioner, v. The Pabst Brewing Company. December 24, 1906. Mr: Wm. F. Sheehan and Mr. Joseph Fettretch for petitioner. Mr. A• S. Gilbert for respondent.
Ingersoll v. Coram
No. 519. Eva A. Ingersoll, Administratrix, etc., Petitioner, v. Joseph A. Coram et al. December 24, 1906. Mr. E. N. Harwood, Mr. Hannis Taylor, Mr. Hollis B. Bailey and Mr. John H. Hazelton for petitioner. Mr. Louis D. Brandéis and Mr. Wm.
United States v. Shipp
UNITED STATES v. SHIPP. INFORMATION IN CONTEMPT. No. 12. Original. Argued December 4, 5, 1906. Decided December 24, 1906. Even if the Circuit'Court of the United States has no jurisdiction to entertain the petition for habéas corpus of one
Board of Education of the Kentucky Annual Conference of the Methodist Episcopal Church v. Illinois
BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE KENTUCKY ANNUAL CONFERENCE OF THE METHODIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH v. ILLINOIS. ERROR. TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 103. Argued November 14, 1906. Decided December 24, 1906. The fact that, as constr
Cahen v. Brewster
CAHEN v. BREWSTER, TAX COLLECTOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 91. Argued November 9, 1906. Decided December 24, 1906. While under former decisions of this court the nature of inheritance taxes has been defined,
Kinney v. Mitchell
No. 131. Robert D. Kinney, Plaintiff in Error, v. James T. Mitchell. Argued for defendant in error and submitted for plaintiff in error December 13, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Mr. Robert D. Kinney pro se. Mr. Marlin E. Olmsted and Mr.
Illinois Central Railroad v. Edwards
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. EDWARDS. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. EDWARDS. No. 12. Submitted December 14, 1905; Restored to docket December 18, 1906; Resubmitted April 16, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Decided on authori
Illinois Central Railroad v. McKendree
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. McKENDREE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF CARLISLE COUNTY, STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 13. Submitted December 14, 1905; Restored to docket December 18, 1906; Resubmitted April 16, 1906. Decided December 17, 19
Rearick v. Pennsylvania
REARICK v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 47. Argued October 18, 19, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Where orders are given for goods sold in a State by an agent of a person employed to solicit
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Hughes
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. HUGHES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF VIRGINIA. No. 119. Argued December 6, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. Where the highest court of the State dismisses the writ, of error to the
Frederic L. Grant Shoe Co. v. W. M. Laird Co.
FREDERIC L. GRANT SHOE COMPANY v. W. M. LAIRD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTER.N DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 63. Argued October 26, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. A judgment of the bankruptcy court
Alabama & Vicksburg Railway Co. v. Mississippi Railroad Commission
ALABAMA AND VICKSBURG RAILWAY COMPANY v. MISSISSIPPI RAILROAD COMMISSION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 97! Argued November 13, 14, 1906. Decided December 17, 1906. A State may insist upon equality of rates, an
Patrick v. New York
No. 336. Albert T. Patrick, Plaintiff in Error, v. The People of the State of New York. December 13, 1906. Mr. William Lindsay for plaintiff in error. No appearance for defendants in error.
First National Bank v. Flickinger
No. 473. The First National Bank of Vandalia, Ill., et al., Petitioners, v. Edward Flickinger. December 10, 1906. Mr. W. C. Herron and Mr. John N. VanDeman for petitioners. Mr. T. E. Powell for respondent.
McCoach v. Philadelphia Trust, Safe Deposit & Insurance
Nos. 502 and 503. No. 504. William McCoach, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. The Philadelphia Trust, Safe Deposit and Insurance Company, Executors, etc., et al.; and William McCoach, Collector, etc., Petitioner, v. George W. Norris et al., E
New Jersey v. Anderson
NEW JERSEY v. ANDERSON. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 49. Argued October 19, 1906. Decided December 10, 1906. The requirement of' § 64a of the bankruptcy law of 1898 in regard to preference of taxes i
United States ex. rel. Lowry & Planters Compress Co. v. Allen
UNITED STATES ex.rel. LOWRY AND PLANTERS COMPRESS COMPANY v. ALLEN, COMMISSIONER OF PATENTS. ERROR TO THE COURT OP APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 56. Argued October 24, 25, 1906. Decided December 10, 1906. Rule 124 of the Patent O
Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. Lyon
GILA VALLEY, GLOBE AND NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. LYON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COÜRT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 96. Argued November 13, 1906. Decided December 10, 1906. Where the negligence of the master in not supplying proper applian
United States ex rel. Taylor v. Taft
UNITED STATES ex rel. TAYLOR v. TAFT, SECRETARY OF WAR. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 300. Submitted November 19, 1906. Decided December 10, 1906. Where a government employé does not deny the authority of th
Ex parte Wisner
Ex parte WISNER. PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF MANDAMUS AND OF PROHIBITION. Nos. 9, 10. Original. Submitted May 14, 1906. Decided December 10, 1906. The Supreme Court of the United St'ates alone possesses jurisdiction derived immediately from the
Stuart v. Hauser
No. 60. Granville Stuart, Plaintiff in Error, v. Samuel T. Hauser et al. Argued November 15, 1906. Decided December 3, 1906. Mr. George B. Colby and Mr. Charles W. Dayton for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. M. Stockslager and Mr. W. E. Borah for
Crane v. Buckley
CRANE v. BUCKLEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 58. Argued October 25, 1906. Decided December 3, 1906. The obligation of sureties upon bonds is strictissimi. juris and not to bo extended by implication or
New York Foundling Hospital v. Gatti
NEW YORK FOUNDLING HOSPITAL v. GATTI. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP ARIZONA. No. 21. Argued April 26, 1006. Decided December 3, 1906. A habeas corpus proceeding involving the care and custody of a child of tender years i
United States v. Dalcour
UNITED STATES v. DALCOUR. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 69. Argued October 30, 31. 1900. Decided December 3, 1906. Section 6 of the act of March 3, 1891, 26 Stat. 826, recogniz
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.