Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1813 Cases
46 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wallen v. Williams
WALLEN v. WILLIAMS. ’Jflie Cil-cuit Court of Ten« nessee, as a C*urt of'equiiy, cannot award a writ oí hab. facial possessionem to enforce its , ecree. Araí»..,Livingston, Todb,«íw£ Btorv, J„ ERROR tó the Circuit Court for the district of E
Otis v. Bacon
OTIS v. BACON. J&seuí....ToDD, J. B sectíoíTof the act of 25th April, 1808, vol. 9, p. 3 60, the collector liad no right to detail! a vessel and cargo after her arrival at her port of destination, under a suspicion that she intended to viol
Livingston v. Dorgenois
LIVINGSTON v. DORGENOIS. Absent...Livingston, J. and Todd, J. A writ of ei*"r°jer of the Court ^ToceS? finally * «pon nuggesion of the attornev for the United States,. ni,ed states are not parcourtwñlaward a man- „ procedente, THIS was a wr
United States v. Patterson
THE UNITED STATES v. PATTERSON. Absent....Tom), J. A debtor or YtateY^YhY puts evidence Mmseir U¡n-to the hands of a public of. Uuited^States to collect and’ nev^when're cei'v’ed)tathe credit of such debtor m account with the United States,
United States v. January
THE UNITED STATES v. JANUARY AND PATTERSON. Msenh\..Tovi>, J. When 'a collect*»r oí reAenue, Has given two oonds conduct at'difi ferent period? aud with ditfe'rentsureties, a promise by the supervisor to apply his payments exclusively to th
Schocner Anne v. United States
THE SCHOCNER ANNE v. THE UNITED STATES. A libel maybe amended.aflcr reversal for jwant of sub* standal averments. A iibri must aver specially all' th»i facts ■which constitute iio of-fence The noayntercourse act of March 1,1809, was iiv for
Young v. Black
YOUNG AND AL v. BLACK. lf lIu,ee -0¡nt owners of a cargo employ-the ship tosen j*íor & hecoinc*"interested in the the' iom,°owners, he cannot, an,, action .¿S him by three joint cover*^-’al mount of sales, set off his share ofHiatamou.it. U
Palmer v. Allen
PALMER v. ALLEN. .3&6T?¡i..,.Tonn, J. in tlie district ot'Connectiout the marshal SCSf™ debt, without “ommi^the Defendant to pr»sonforv,an» o a>' E RROR to the Supremo Court of Errors of the state of Connecticut, in any action of assault an
Young v. Grundy
YOUNG v. GRUNDY. Although ché 'yr^nissot-| note fail, by reason of Gift failure of the payee to perform his part of the agreement Upon which it was given, yet if a new agreement as a substitute for the oi
Fairfax's Devisee v. Hunter's Lessee
FAIRFAX'S DEVISEE v. HUNTER’S LESSEE. .25scnf....MAKSHAEi, Ch. J. and Washington, J. Lord Fairfat the tíme his death,- had fro ,• rT*Use¡•2en|J ^aste'ami u-e appropriated’*" lands in tin* «™Yirginii. ■ tov ma" cite lans)s”ni vúí gima by ocv
Livingston & Gilchrist v. Maryland Insurance
LIVINGSTON & GILCHRIST v. THE MARYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY Absent....Livingston, J. and Todd, J. To cirtistitiito a representation (in make ing insurance) there should be an affirm a* tion or denial of some tact} “¿n"1 which" would plainly le
M'Intire v. Wood
M'INTIRE v. WOOD. •d&seíit,...Washington, J. and Todb, J. Ihe chWcuit°f Courts1ofthe United States wit of manfiamus, tóeossively to those cases in which ^“aiy'to'üie exercise of their juristic THIS case came up from the Circuit Court for th
Oliver v. Maryland Insurance
OLIVER v. THE MARYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY. .áfesení.... Washington, j. and Todd, J. The length of time a vessel SnWcar! go,withonuiia-s charging the underwriters, /'does not deP™^ on the 3? . 4 The danger ^fy aVesifto remaining irf dischargi
Mills v. Duryee
MILLS v. DURYEE. Absent..Todd, J. Nill debet is not a goodan action founded o» á ¿nothet^tate. ERROR to the Circuit Court for the district. Columbia in an action of debt upon a judgment of the Supreme Court of the state of New York, to whic
Blackwell v. Patton & Erwin's Lessee
BLACKWELL v. PATTON & ERWIN's lessee. Msent Washington, J„ and Todd, .7. By die laws of w. Carolina adeedforiaS Tennessee, executed in N. Carolina, byt grantors residing there jjj the veaz* proved i7’f by 0 ' snb" scribing witnesses before
Barnitz's Lessee v. Casey
BARNITZ’S LESSEE v. ROBERT CASEY. Present.,..All the Judges. descontó "in • Maryland ■ has not declared now an intestate estate shall descend, rived' to^the" mte^tate from his half brother» or from his brother of blood 'orfrom tis son or da
Holker v. Parker
HOLKER AND OTHERS v. PARKER. Fresent....Ml the Jndgés except Todd, J. Ah attorney at law, as such, has, authority tt> submit thi* cause to arhitrauon. But an. attorney Hf law, merely as such, has no right* strictly speaking, to ri.ike-” a c
Riggs v. Lindsay
RIGGS v. LINDSAY. Absent....Tovn, J. danta havh"¿ ordered the Plaintiff'to n.v' them/and to dray, on lie having so S™^ftheynd areboúmi to «“¶* \nd pay his bills; and if they do not, he may them Umfa-m mount of the “ageTand" costs of protest
Smith v. Delaware Insurance
SMITH AND BUCHANAN v. THE DELAWARE INSURANCE COMPANY. Washington, J. and Todd, J. A\ verdict “ fur dants^bjcct to the opinion Of. the Court Opon the points -reserved,” e°ñ ab solute0 judjTmcnt-for “the points reserv'•^u^o^the'" Courtthemm,
Williams v. Armroyd
WILLIAM WILLIAMS and others, Appellants, v. GEORGE ARMROYD and others, Appellees. Absent, Todd, J. a sentence ¿t L„°[dgn ‘T*’ aeranini? netttral property uo^Tt iniSeit «oñtrary to í vioía-"3’ ,«on of neutral rights! au
Stark v. Chesapeake Insurance
STARK v. THE CHESAPEAKE INSURANCE COMPANY. MsciiL...Washington, J. Todd, J.
Biays v. Chesapeake Insurance
BIAYS v. THE CHESAPEAKE INSURANCE COMPANY. Jlbsent....Tóxm, .L There cannot' i>e a'totai loss in^of memo- . bne speciesf (such ns hides.) liable.for sal-., aEís under the hsureitoia* bfjl'and travel yatíon^of the" eargo, unless ' where tte
Ferguson v. Harwood
FERGUSON v. HARWOOD. Absent....Todd, J. Court^certffy ¡a the foot, * K* tobe á record, “ that “the “ing is truly “ the record of “proceedings” & if ttajudgé, chief justice’ ma"tote°B certify that tion oflt
Maryland Insurance v. Wood
THE MARYLAND INSURANCE COMPANY. v. WOOD. • - Mr? Merrv to the secretary isd^S’April? 1804, extend: fandof Curra" goa, the of-der óf the lords cóttinus'Rduers ortlieadmipuU ty of the sth of re"pSÍ*te blockade0 of tíwdSe & a °I,e‘ . ERROR to
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.