Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1813

Webster v. Hoban

WEBSTER AND FORD v. HOBAN. ¥resent....ffl, the Judges except Todd, J. upon a sale'ot land * térraAe thaf the purchaser so^daysfgire' bis notes with f^da™¿ if< he shaú fan 3 ddys^thenth? Ia?d t0 ^ couritotthe Purcba‘ maintain an action again

11 U.S. 399 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Business & Corporate Law 1813

Mutual Assurance Society v. Korn

THE MUTUAL ASSURANCE SOCIETY v. KORN AND WISEMILLER. •/i&sent....Washington, J. The. propriaéfs of buildmgs m Alexandria, insured by the society, thereact°ofd^ isembiy of ginia passed in subsequent018 regulations of pay San'etaád¡tionai pue

11 U.S. 396 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1813

Schooner Hoppet & Cargo v. United States

THE SCHOONER HOPPET AND CARGO v. THE UNITED STATES. .áiseíií....Livingston, J. and Todd, J. the ¡°f poned^rnthe Urfited States buercouree™”' act, re-export-j‘].‘“,a sold tó a merchant otMhat thence export-"i to New Giu.r’opcSn of that, act

11 U.S. 389 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1813

Cargo of Brig Aurora v. United States

THE CARGO OF THE BRIG AURORA, BURN SIDE, CLAIMANT, v. THE UNITED STATES. Present....J1U the Judges except Todd, j. The Legislarevivaf of an act depend eyent,3 and "dircct thatevent to be made ciam™ion.pr°' vivedby^'aubsequent act, it is rev

11 U.S. 382 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1813

Herbert v. Wren

HERBERT AND OTHERS v. WREN AND WIFE AND OTHERS. Present...-,Ml the, Judges except Todd, «7. Courts ' of Chancery have concurrent jurisdiction' with Courts of law, In cases of tíower, especially, where-j^rtition, .disco•yery, or . account is

11 U.S. 370 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1813

Lee v. Munroe

LEE v. MUNROE & THORNTON. Msent....Johnson, J. and Todd, J. The United bound5 declaration;! of frande^unoh a mistake of clear!?11 If55c? - that'the^géuT was acting scope*of hs authority, and SlutóTcapacity ofagent to make such ¿HÍS was an a

11 U.S. 366 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Employment Law 1813

Brig Caroline v. United States

BRIG CAROLINE, WILLIAM BROADFOOT, CLAIMANT, v. THE UNITED STATES. A libel for a i'qrfeiture must be particular and certain in all the material tut” the of-fence. mationinrem, «tended6 by leave of the Court. ERROR to the Circuit Court for th

11 U.S. 496 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1813

Jane v. United States

THE SCHOONER JANE v. THE UNITED STATES. Present....All the Judges except Tobd, J. in a proseen, Mon of a law 9f the United btates it is not necessary to ndducepositivc testimotiy of the identity of the vessel, THIS was an appeal from the se

11 U.S. 363 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1813

Caze v. Baltimore Insurance

CAZE AND RICHAUD v. THE BALTIMORE INSURANCE COMPANY. Absent....Tom>, J. The underwriters upon a cargo are not liable for ^rataitiheriTto the owner óf 6^ vessel, owneFof the cargo insured, cargo were the «íto^he u«iderwriters as byujem a¿nd

11 U.S. 358 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Estate Planning & Probate 1813

Thornton v. Carson

THORNTON v. CARSON Msent....Tovo, J. not vir'be 'S "auselt .isVn at'™“'n tingcnt, nor" natives ^e-1" quires the jpar- {* M^nctisn with others, aiJ[ over Whom he n0 ooutw1 TRROR tp the Circuit Court for the district • iff: Columbia, sitting

11 U.S. 596 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1813

Brig Penobscot v. United States

BRIG PENOBSCOT v. THE UNITED STATES. Msent....Todd, J, trnder the hpn-interveS, ItT* Ú 4Maych, i8it, tocomeInto the wate'm of fter'she ,te¿8 her car- THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the Circuit Court of the district of Géorgia, whic

11 U.S. 356 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1813

Preston v. Tremble

PRESTON v. TREMBLE. *36sen.i....ToDD, J. .If an equitable title be mergthe'partylias no relief in Sough the grant be void, » being con-0 ERROR to the Circuit Court for the district of East Tennessee, who had dismissed the Plaintiffs bill in

11 U.S. 354 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Business & Corporate Law 1813

Bond v. Jay

BOND AND ANOTHER v. JAY. Msent....ToBB, J. Uoir in^IFe Maryland státuie of limitao'f"«suci^ac«counts a? it «ciiandize «chant, their “ factors ami «which ^re «not residents « province,”>!S applies tode’aimwchant681*' creditor resiMar i?'“d a

11 U.S. 350 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1813

Schooner Good Catharine v. United States

THE SCHOONER GOOD CATHARINE v. THE UNITED STATES. J&semi..o.LiviNGSTosr, J. and Todd, J, A vessel ofthe optured*co¿ demned, sold, master, a eiti\thooY taincd a Danish burgher's a port of the United States as a Dane, is'a foreign vessel "itl

11 U.S. 349 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1813

Locke v. United States

LOCKE v. THE UNITED STATES. . Absent....Todd, J. in a count ¡n a soulsUec°ofthe ¿«lection law °r March 2d, '1799, for unlading goods without a>pe> mit, it is not necessary to state the time and place of importation, nor the vessel in which,

11 U.S. 339 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1813

Marine Insurance v. Hodgson

THE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALEXANDRIA v. HODGSON. Present....Jill the Judges except. Tod®, J. Ujonan action puP°a'1 valued ipoiicy, if a iationVrof°tht age & tonnage vvhCTehy U«iic’ underwriters jvero induced to agpee to a high valuati

11 U.S. 332 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Insurance Law 1813

Dickey v. Baltimore Insurance

DICKEY v. THE BALTIMORE INSURANCE COMPANY. Present....Jill the Judges* except1 Tono, J. a policy of in * and from," an p«>-, . port to port of g0. ERROR to the Circuit Court for the district of Maryland, in an action, on a policy of Insuran

11 U.S. 327 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1813

Clark's Executors v. Carrington

CLARK’S EXECUTORS v. CARRINGTON. Absent... Johnson, J. and Todd, J. I a case of •warranty and indemnity, a grinstüíe pérson to be in, ^Tóltained e1peci°aiiy If ’ obtained on . warrantor, is fcdmíssiblfc evis^iBthinfoh ps contract óf upon re

11 U.S. 308 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1813

Queen v. Hepburn

MIMA QUEEN AND CHILD, PETITIONERS for freedom, v. HEPBURN. I’resent,.i.Ml the Judges except Todd, J. Hearsay evideneé ¡a in-" competent to «peoiftó fact, which is, in its "eptíbie of be-mg proved by Sfrom ° their omr knowledge, dom in Movy¡

11 U.S. 290 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed 1813

Barton v. Petit

BARTON v. PETIT AND BAYARD. Absent....Johnson, J. and Todd, J". if the original r'tereerf the reversal óf the dependent ihe^Mbrth1 coming bond” conrse- but a ran is neeessai‘y to bring up -I he execution upon which íren so asTo show the con

11 U.S. 288 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1813

United States v. Gordon

THE UNITED STATES v. GORDON AND OTHERS. Msent...*Livingston, J. and Todd, J. '^rwld'oe” He to cany to court Uor&I United states whillcfeW carried from. District elm* ^outf by writ ofer- ; It js a good defence an a?t!oa Ia°gn0bond,m" that it

11 U.S. 287 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1813

Bank of Columbia v. Patterson's

THE BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’r. Absent Johnson, J. and Todd, J. Upon aspc“^ciU“nt,'ac£ the part oftte> In" XlpX wlii lie for the price. simple contract is not mej-ged m a ment, which merely reeogmzes the debt, and fixes' the mode

11 U.S. 299 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion