Find court opinions that match your case.

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1815

Pratt v. Law

PRATT, and others, Original Complainants, v. THOMAS LAW, and WILLIAM CAMPBELL, Original Defendants. THOMAS LAW, Original Complainant, v. PRATT, and others, Original Defendants. PRATT, and others, Original Complainants, v. WM. M. DUNCANSON,

13 U.S. 456 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1815

The Nereide

THE NEREIDE, Bennett, master. . Absent....Todd, J. THIS was an appeal by Manuel Pinto, from the sentence of the Circuit Court for the district, of New York, affirming (pro forme) the sentence of the District Court which condemned that part

13 U.S. 388 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

The Brig Concord

THE BRIG CONCORD, Taylor, master. 1815. March 11th. dbsenL,..Torn}, J, THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the Circuit Court, affirming that.of the .District Court, whicji re" stored 1o the Claimants,, neutral Spanish merchants at Tener

13 U.S. 387 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1815

United States v. Bryan

THE UNITED STATES v. BRYAN AND WOODCOCK, (Garnishees of Hendrickson.) J}b'sent....Tjun, J. Hie sth sticlion of the act ot the 3d ot March, 1707, p™;?: a-priorito United .states out of the effects of their debtors, did not apply to a debt du

13 U.S. 374 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

The Grotius

THE GROTIUS, Sheafe, master. 1816, March 10th. Msént.,.JYaim, J. ih order to capture,’"rome act Rouid be done indicative to seize Sid to retain as prize; it is sufficient if such intention is fairly to be therconduct°S' the captor, THIS cas

13 U.S. 368 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

The Brig Alerta v. Moran

THE BRIG ALERTA, and cargo, (Brosquet, Claimant,) v. BLAS MORAN, libellant. Msent....Todd, J. THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the district Court, for the district of New Orleans*, (which has jurisdiction also ,of a Circuit Court.) T

13 U.S. 359 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1815

Otis v. Watkins

OTIS v. WATKINS. Ahsent..,.Todd, J. ERROR to tlie Supreme Judicial Court of the eonxmenvvealth of Massachusetts, under the 25th section of the judiciary law of the United States, yol. 1, p. 63, in an action of trespass by Watkins against Ot

13 U.S. 339 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1815

Town of Pawlet v. Clark

THE TOWN OF PAWLET v. DANIEL CLARK, and others. Msént....ToDD, J. . This Court tio?^vhete" one’ party der™S,''rantn" from0tif?statc of New t (ampoiher unde?» grantfrom the at the time oí the first grant, part^New3 Hawpshire. lamfin equal sh

13 U.S. 292 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

The Brig Ann

THE BRIG ANN, M‘Clain, master. 1815, March 10th. j®se«í....ToBB', J. APPEAL from the sentence of the Circuit Court for the district of Connecticut, which reversed that of the District Court, and restored the property to the -,. . ■ x x ■ Cl

13 U.S. 289 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1815

The Schooner Adeline & Cargo

THE SCHOONER ADELINE AND CARGO. Absént....Tom), J .... •fured may be payment of salvage, ai-. thoughUie bel prays c'ondemnanon of it as p>\ze of war, ami does nut olai.;¡ salvage. Salvage • is an incident: to E ,e question of prize. THIS, w

13 U.S. 244 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Employment Law 1815

United States v. Barber

THE UNITED STATES v. JOB L. BARBER. ,%eilf...,T0DD, J. THIS was a case certified from the Circuit Court for the district of Vermont, the opinions of the judgés of which Court were opposed. Fat'-cattle wc provisions, or ““within the meaning

13 U.S. 243 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1815

United States v. Giles

THE UNITED STATES v. GILES and others. Msent....Toon, J. if a marshal dtatfeof Usotr. re-Sec^tion^mo* ney «lueiothefrom the c°raPf^®rt)!® il’bankofthe U; states, wliicK su'r&V ties mhisoffiwards, are not “uhough the'' money remain ™&nás the

13 U.S. 212 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1815

Ship Societe

SHIP SOCIETE, Martinson, master. J6se/íí..-..TpbD, J. APPEAL from the sentence of thé Circuit Court %r the district of Georgia, affirming the decree of the district Court which allowed freight pro rata itiveris, to the Swedish ship Societe,

13 U.S. 209 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

Cargo of the Ship Hazard v. Campbell

CARGO OF THE SHIP HAZARD v. CAMPBELL and others. Abséntf...ToirD, J. APPEAL from the sentence of the Circuit Court for the district of Georgia, affirming that of the Circuit Court which .condemned the cargo of the Russian ship Hazard, as Br

13 U.S. 205 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1815

Evans v. Jordan

EVANS v. JORDAN and MOREHEAD. .Msent..,Tom>, J. This w*as a case certified from the Circuit Court for the district of Virginia, in which, the judges were divided in opinion upon the question, whether after the expiration of the original pat

13 U.S. 199 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1815

Thirty Hogsheads of Sugar v. Boyle

THIRTY HOGSHEADS OF SUGAR, (Adrian B. Bentzon, Claimant,) v. BOYLE AND OTHERS, Being the officers and crew of the privateer Comet. Absent....Todd. J. APPEAL from the sentence of the Circuit Court; for the district of Maryland,'condemning 30

13 U.S. 191 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1815

The Frances

THE FRANCES, Boyer, Master, (Dunham and Randolph’s claim.) Absent....Todo, J. IN this case further proof was ordered at the. last term. (See Ante vol. S,p. 334.; If a BritisU own funds, tv* cargoes of .goods m consequence of, but not in exa

13 U.S. 183 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

United States v. The Cargo of the Ship Fanny

THE UNITED STATES v. THE CARGO OF THE SHIP FANNY, Jennings, master. Msent....Toon, J. APPEAL from the sentence of the Circuit Court for the oisirict of Connecticut, restoring the property to the 9 air*; t/ianuants. Under tbe „ course act, o

13 U.S. 181 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1815

Owens v. Hanney

OWENS v. HANNEY. li&seuf....Livingston, J. Story, J. and Todd, J. It is not necosFaryMmt the ' • transcript of the record shoulc* cnutftm the names of the jurors. Sembthat if it appear by the record (hat the Plaintiff belo-w was a suiijeet

13 U.S. 180 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1815

M'Iver's Lessee v. Walker

M‘IVER’S Lessee v. WALKER and another. •#6senf....LiviNGs’T0N, J. Story, J.

13 U.S. 173 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1815

Finley v. Williams

FINLEY v. WILLIAMS and others. Absent....Tobo, X It rentrk5f ial -.viir not look bujond ty and MtyS‘to Z elder entry ,agafeanddei- -pre«rnption rights, the primemmiihold the la xi a-try, survey & ‘ THIS was an appeal from the decree of the

13 U.S. 164 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1815

Clark's Executors v. Van Riemsdyk

CLARK’S EXECUTORS v. VAN RIEMSDYK. Abseni....ToDO, J, THIS cause was this day argued by Burgess and St.icicton, for the Appellants, and Harper, for the Appellee, in the absence of the reporter. The answer, £'e¡„D2 dery is not evideuce again

13 U.S. 153 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed 1815

Doe v. M'Farland

DOE, Lessee of LEWIS and WIFE, v. M‘FARLAND and others. Msefit....Tom}, J. ERROR to the Circuit Court, for the district of Kentucky, in an action of ejectment.' it ¡s not rabea. Slir-V Y executor of a will, made in Y!'Sin“> locutor, Lmi •«

13 U.S. 151 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1815

The Mary

THE MARY, Stafford, mastf Msent....Tom), J. The condomsd'w menu's prnpertj^for ■want of a pre>’iiceanthe ■claim for her hstiu competent for tile Claimant of the cargo to controvert the feet that the vessel was enemy’s property, so far as pb

13 U.S. 126 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion