Find court opinions that match your case.

Reversed Estate Planning & Probate 1815

Drummond's Administrators v. Magruder & Co's.

DRUMMOND’S Administrators v. MAGRUDER & Co’s. Trustees. vi&seni....Livingston, J. Story, J. and Todd, X, F the portantanexhihit of the Com-by the D. dant in his answer, who calls -apon the Commak'e” fuli° ¿roof thereof ip the Court Conit’wd

13 U.S. 122 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

The St. Lawrence

THE ST. LAWRENCE, Webb, master. (M‘Gregor and Penniman Claimants.) Absent....Tomi, J. ■ rr u on tiie a war with this thizeiishave’a right to property from (he e'ietny’s country^ it ’¡-¡“¿i,, a reasonable time. month" after the declaration l

13 U.S. 120 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1815

Gettings v. Burch's Administratix

GETTINGS v. BURCH’S Administratix. Absent....Todd, J. tL19Orphan’s Coul-f for the Washington m the district of Columbia to swei- of a lie-answer hid been denied by ancílftherebe no evidence in MntraSn”5 S™uwctS THIS was an appeal from the s

13 U.S. 372 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Personal Injury 1815

Arnold v. United States

ARNOLD and others v. THE UNITED STATES. The double dufeimposed by the act of 'accrued up™ goocts which aloUectiondistrjet.oo that day- • an importation, -so as to rightto duties, it is npcessaty ’there°'sLiiWt k*ran Arrival "'¡thin the li-

13 U.S. 104 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

The Ship Richmond v. United States

THE SHIP RICHMOND, v. THE UNITED STATES. Msent...*Tóms', J. The tion-in- . tercoursé act of28:h of June, 1809. Yol. I'>5 p.' IS, which. requires a vessel bound to a permitted port to give bond in double the ainomit of vessel and cargo not t

13 U.S. 102 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1815

Polk's Lessee v. Wendal

POLK’S Lessee v. WENDAL & AL. J&sewi....Livingston, J. Todd, J.

13 U.S. 87 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1815

Randolph v. Donaldson

RANDOLPH v. DONALDSON. ^i»seni....MAUsiiAiT,, Ch. J. Todd, J. u a dcbtpi-, uiSer'pmiesi from the unfeed "state" escape, the ie not ERROR to the Circuit Court for the district of an ac^on debt, brought by Donaldson against Randolph, late mar

13 U.S. 76 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

Struggle v. United States

BRIG STRUGGLE (Thomas Leigh, Claimant.) v. THE UNITED STATES. APPEAL from the sentence of the Circuit Court for the district of Massachusetts, which condemned the brig Struggle, for violation of the non-intercourse act of 28¡h of June., 180

13 U.S. 71 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1815

Parker v. Rule's Lessee

PARKER v. RULE’S Lessee. ábicñt'...Johnson, J. 'and Todd, J, Seon^i-css uf b“Scoiic“t a direct, tax, (Ji;lv-1bi .) lector tmú!} fot non-payment ^J’Lís’ary tint he si-onid “‘^vtor (he Sht-' of lamis, ^K,r^ théAmount due tor ti.s ^tifioatlon^

13 U.S. 64 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1815

The Brig Short Staple & Cargo v. United States

THE BRIG SHORT STAPLE AND CARGO, (Hallaway and others, Claimants,) v. THE UNITED STATES. Jlbsent....Johnson, J. cj- Tono, J. THIS was an appeal from the sentence of the Circuit Court, for the, district of Massachusetts, which affirmed that

13 U.S. 55 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1815

Terrett v. Taylor

TERRETT and others v TAYLOR and others. ¿3&sení....Johnson, J. and Todd, J. ERROR to the Circuit Court for the district of Columbia, sitting in the county of Alexandria. The relig!ous establishment of England by \hed colony t°tite common la

13 U.S. 43 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1815

Speake v. United States

SPEAKE AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED STATES. Msent...Tovp, J. A bond taken by vU-iiie of of the embargo law of January dot’ void’ at though , taken ^arues^R-N the ^vessel trio sanai. m-e° Sopped to deny that Euob1’™bS'id01 is doutue the true val

13 U.S. 28 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed 1815

Taber v. Perrott & Lee

TABER v. PERROTT AND LEE Jlbsent....Todd, J. ERROR to the Circuit Court for’ the district of Rhode Island, in an action of assumpsit to recover from the Defondant’s Ferrott and Lee, the amount of certain bills of exchange put into their han

13 U.S. 39 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1815

Simms v. Guthrie

SIMMS v. GUTHRIE AND AL. 4#&seMi....LiviNGST0N, J. Story, J. and Todd, J. Kentucky, in a suit in chancery. ERROR to the Circuit Court for the District of The lanil law of Virginia, which gives a eJ^tion TcT" tll0Sfc who had marked & im«‘ pr

13 U.S. 19 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1815

Meigs v. M'Clung's Lessee

MEIGS and AL v. M‘CLUNG’S lessee. •ífcseat... Johnson, J. Todd, J. ERROR to the Circuit Court tor the district of East Teimesso', in an nclion of ejectment brought 1VTCiting’s lessee against Meigs and others. in the treaty with the Che.5 ro

13 U.S. 11 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1815

Mandeville v. Union Bank

MANDEVILLE v. THE UNION BANK OF GEORGETOWN. ^&semt....LiviNÜsíí>Ñ, J. Todd, J,> and Story, J. ERRfiR to the Circuit Court for the district" of Columbia, for the county, of Alexandria, in an action debt, by the Union Bank against Mandeville,

13 U.S. 9 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion