Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1828 Cases
55 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Biddle v. Wilkins
Richard Biddle, Administrator &c. of John Wilkins vs. James C. Wilkins. The plaintiff, as administrator of W., had brought a suit in the District Court of the United States, for the Western District of Pennsylvania, and recovered a judgment
Alexander v. Brown
William B. Alexander, Francis Swann, and Thomas Swann, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Elisha Brown, Defendant in Error. Under the law of Virginia, which directs the -sheriff holding an execution against the goods and effects of defendants, to tak
Pray v. Belt
Ann Pray, Executrix, J. J. Maxwell, and George Waters Executors of John Pray, Deceased, Appellants, vs. George G. Belt, Trustee, and James P. Heath, pro. ami. The testator in his will says, “ whereas my will is lengthy, and it is possible I
Ross v. Doe on the Demise of Barland
Allison Ross, Plaintiff in Error, vs. John Doe on the demise of Adam Barland, and others. Both the plaintiff and defendants claimed title under the provisions of the Act of Congress, passed 3d March, 1803, entitled “ An Act regulating the g
Barry v. Coombe
Robert Barry, Appellant, vs. Griffith Coombe, Appellee. The statute offrauds.in Maryland requires written evidence of the contract, . or a Court cannot decree performance. The words of the statute are “ unless the. agreement upon which such
Jackson v. Clark
James Jackson, Ex-demise of Lazy Anderson vs. John Clark and Robert Ellison. Construction of the Act of Congress passed March 2d 1807, entitled i“ An Act to exteffd the time, for locating Virginia military warrants, for returning surveys th
M'Arthur v. Porter's Lessee
Duncan M‘Arthur, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Wesley S. Porter’s Lessee. A special verdict' was found by the jury, .upon which judgment was-.to be entered according as the opinion of tbe Court'might be upon the con- • struction of a certain deed
M'Donald v. Smalley
James M’Donald, Appellant, v. Freeman Smalley, and Others, (in all forty.) Where the record from' the Cburt below, contained the whole proceedings in the case, and exhibited all the matters'either party required for a final • disposition of
Fullerton v. President of the Bank of the United States
Humphrey Fullerton, John Carlisle, and John Waddle, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States, Defendants in Error. The, state of Ohio, not having been admitted into .the Union until 1802
Tayloe v. Riggs
John Tayloe, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Elisha Riggs, Defendant in Error. The rule of law is, that the' best evidence, must be' given,-of which the nature of the thing incapable; that'is] that no evidence shall be received, which-pre-supposes
Archer v. Deneale
John Archer and John W. Stump, Executors of John Stump, Complainants and Appellants, vs. Mary Deneale, Widow and Executrix of George Deneale deceased, Charles T. Stuart and Ann Lucretia his Wife, Mary Catharine and Nancy P. Deneale, Childre
Bank of Columbia ex rel. Bank of United States v. Lawrence
The Bank of Columbia, use of the Bank of the United States, vs. John Lawrence. A promissory note was made at Georgetown, payable at the Bank of Co■lumbia, in that town ; the defendant,' the endorser of the note living in the county of Alexa
United States v. Stansbury
The United States, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Nicholas Stansbury and Edward Morgan. The discharge, by the Secretary of the Treasury, of the principal in a bond to the United States, who is imprisoned under a ca,,sa. issued against him, and wh
Waring v. Jackson
Stephen Waring, Plaintiff in Error, vs. James Jackson, exdevise of Medcef Eden and Another, Defendants in Error. The Same vs. The Same. The testator devised to his son Joseph Eden certain portions of his estate.iii New York, •among' which w
Bank of Columbia v. Sweeny
The Bank of Columbia vs. George Sweeny. The Court refused to issue, a mandartms to the Circuit Court for the county , of Washington, commanding that Court to strike off a plea Which the Court had permitted the defendant to put in, and'to co
Nicholls v. Hodges
William S. Nicholls, and Others, Appellants, vs. Thomas Hodges, Executor of Thomas C. Hodges, deceased. The Orphans’ Court, by the testamentary laws of Maryland, has a general ■power to administer justice ip all matters relative to the affa
Steele's Lessee v. Spencer
Robert Steele’s Lessee, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Jesse Spencer And Others, Defendants in Error. ■A decree of the Supreme Court of Ohio ordered that the patentee of a certain tract of land, should, within six months, make a deed, &c. withcove
United Status v. 422 Casks of Wine
The United Status vs. 422 Casks of Wine, Hazard & Williams Claimants. It.is not the habit oí this Court, to consider .points again open for discussion, whic)» have heg.n :once. deliberately decided, and have furnished the ground work, of th
American Insurance v. 356 Bales of Cotton
The American Insurance Company, and the Ocean Insurance Company, (of New-York,) Appellants, vs. 356 Bales of Cotton, David Canter Claimant and Appellee. The Constitution of the United States confers, absolutely, onthegovernn nt of the Union
Davis v. Mason
John Davis and Others, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Richard B. Mason, Lessee. In an action of ejectment to recover land in Kentucky, the law of real estate in Kentucky, is the law of this Court, in deciding the rights of the parties., {505} , I
D'Wolf v. Rabaud
James D’Wolf, Junior, Plaintiff in Error, vs. David Jacques Rabaud, Jean Philippe Frederick Rabaud, Alphonse Marc Rabaud, aliens and subjects of the king of France, And Andrew E. Belknap, a citizen of the state of Massachusetts, Defendants
Doe on the Demise of Elmore v. Grymes
Doe on the Demise of John A. Elmore, Plaintiff in Error, vs. William A. Grymes, and John J. Beatie, Defendants in Error. The Courts of the United States have no authority to órder a peremptory nonsuit, against the will of the plaintiff, on
President of the Bank of Columbia v. Hagner
The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of Columbia vs. Peter Hagner. When no specific time for the payment of money is fixed in a contract by which the same is to be paid by one party to the other, in judgment of law, the same is
Conard v. Atlantic Insurance
John Conard vs. The Atlantic Insurance Company New York. It is not necessary that a respondentia loan should be made before the departure of the ship on the voyage; nor that the money loaned, should be employed in the outfit of the vessel,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.