Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1828 Cases
55 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mechanics Bank of Alexandria v. Lynn
The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria, Appellants, vs. Adam Lynn, Appellee. A Court of Equity ought not to decree specific performance of a contract to the letter, where, from change of circumstances, mistake or misapprehension, it would'be unco
Bell v. Morrison
Montgomery Bell, Plaintiff in Error, vs. James Morrison, Anthony Butler, and Jonathan Taylor, Defendants in Error. The authority given by the Act of Congress of 24th September 1789, chap. 20, to take depositions of witnesses, in the absence
Lessee of Spratt v. Spratt
Lessee of Thomas Spratt, Andrew, William, Sarah, Jacob, Catharine, and Pierce Spratt, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Sarah Spratt, Defendant in Error. The Act of the legislature of Maryland, passed 19th December, 1/91, entitled “An Act concerning
Elliott v. Lessee of Peirsol
James Elliott the younger, Benjamin Elliott, Anderson Taylor, Reuben Pater, Patsey Elliott, and Wilford Lepell, vs. The Lessee of William Peirsol, Lydia Peirsol, Ann North, Jane North, Sophia North, Elizabeth F. P. North, and William North,
Dox v. Postmaster-General
Peter Dox, Gerrit La Grange, and Isaiah Townsend, im-pleaded with Gerrit L. Dox, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. The Postmaster-General of the United States, Defendant in Error. The Act of Congress, for regulating the Post-Office Department, does
Barry v. Foyles
Robert Barry, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Thomas Foyles. The defendant in error had sued out an attachment, under the law of Maryland, against Robert Barry, and had filed an account against James T). Barry, said to have been assumed by Robert B
Mechanics Bank v. Seton
The Mechanics Bank of Alexandria, Appellants, vs. Louisa and Anna Maria Seton, Appellees, by their Guardian, &c. Although it seems to be a,general rule, that a Court of Chancery will not decree a specific performance of contracts, except fo
Parker v. United States
Daniel Parker, Plaintiff in Error, vs. The United States. The Adjutant and Inspector General of thé Army of the United States, was not entitled to double rations, from the 30th of September 1818, to the 31st of May 1821. The President of th
Schimmelpennich v. Bayard
Gerrit Schimmelpennich, and Jan Adrian Toe Lear, who are Aliens, vs. William Bayard, William Bayard, jun. Robert Bayard, and Jacob Le Roy, Citizens of the State of New-York. In tliis case, the Court confirm,.the principle estatablished in t
Konig v. Bayard
William Konig, who is an Alien, Plaintiff below, vs. William Bayard, William Bayard, jr. Robert Bayard, and Jacob Le Roy, Citizens of the State of New-York. a-stranger to the c! Aver and endorser of a non-accepted bill of exchange, .may int
Old Grant v. M'Kee ex rel. Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky
Old Grant, on the demise of Samuel Meredith, Plaintiff in Error, vs. John M’Kee, for the use of the Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky. The Court will, not take’jurisdiction of a case, where, although the whole property'claimed by the les
Findlay v. Hinde
James Findlay, William Lytle, Charles Vattier, Robert Ritchie, and Others, Citizens of Ohio, Appellants, vs. Thomas S. Hinde, and Belinda his wife, Citizens of Kentucky, Appellees. If, iñ a case where the loss of a deed or other instrument,
Breithaupt v. Bank of Georgia
Christian Breithaupt, and Henry Shultz, Defendants below, vs. The Bank of the State of Georgia, and others. The complainants are stated, in the bill, to be citizens of the state of South Carolina. The defendant, the Bank of Georgia, is a bo
Horsburg v. Baker
Junius K. Horsburg, Devisee of James Henderson, Appellant, vs. Martin Baker and Hannah his wife, Francis Clark, Robet Boyce, and Peter Mason, for himself, and as Guardian, to Susannah R. Hamlett. A Court of Chancery, is not the proper tribu
Karthaus v. Yllas y Ferrer
Charles W. Karthaus, Plaintiff in error, vs. Francisco Yllas y Ferrer and Others, Defendants in error. There is a class of cases, upon'awards, to be found in the books, in which arbitrators have b.een held to more than ordinary strictness,
Comegys v. Vasse
Cornelius Comegys and Andrew Pettit, Plaintiffs in Error, vs. Ambrose Vasse, Defendant in Error. The object of the treaty with Spain, which ceded Florida to the United States,- dated 22d May 1819, was to invest the commissioners with full p
M'Lanahan v. Universal Insurance
James J. M’Lanahan, Wilhelmus Bogart, and John Joseph Coiron, Plaintiffs in error, vs. The Universal Insurance Company, Defendants in error. insurance. It is, doubtless, within the province of a Court,'in-the exercise of its discretion, to
Wright v. Lessee of Hollingsworth
Henry Wright, William Carothers, Robert Denniston, William Patton, Thomas Burman, and James Robertson, Plaintiffs in error, vs. The Lessee of Levi Hollingsworth, and John Kaighn, Defendants in error. Ih a trial man-action. Of ejectment, in,
Buck v. Chesapeake Insurance
Benjamin Buck & Thomas Herrick vs. The Chesapeake Insurance Company. Insurance.. To affirm, that “ in policies for whom it may concern,” there can be no undue concealment as to the parties interested in the property to be insured,” is obvio
Greenleaf v. Queen
James Greenleaf, Appellant, vs. Nicholas L. Queen, and Eleanor his wife, heirs, and Richard Wallack, administrator, of Washington Boyd, deceased, Appellees. Where, by the terms of a deed, conveying' real estate in trust, lo he sold for the
Mandeville v. Holey
Joseph Mandeville, one of the firm of Richard Slade & Co., Plaintiff in error, vs. George Holey and Thomas Suckley, joint merchants in trade, under the firm of Holey & Suckley, Defendants in error. Under the law of Yirginia, a confession of
Sundry African Slaves v. Madrazo
Sundry African Slaves, The Governor of Georgia, Claimant, Appellant, vs. Juan Madrazo. The Governor of Georgia, Appellant, vs. Sundry African Slaves, Juan Madrazo Claimant. In the District Court of the Únitcd States, for the district of Geo
Rhea v. Rhenner
Daniel Rhea and Others, Appellants, vs. Daniel Rhenner, Appellee. The law seems to be settled, that when the wife is-left by the husband, without maintenance and süpport, has traded as a feme sote, and has obtained credit-as such, she ought
United States v. Saline Bank
The United States, Appellants, vs. The Saline Bank of Virginia, John Webster, and others, Appellees. The plaintiffs, as creditors of an unincorporated bank, filed a bill against the Cashier, and a number of persons, stockholders of the bank
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.