Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1832

Boyle v. Zacharie

Hugh Boyle, Plaintiff in Error v. Zacharie and Turner, Defendants in Error. The judges of this court, who were in the minority of the court upon the general question as to the constitutionality of state insolvent laws, concurred in the opin

31 U.S. 348 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1832

Boardman v. Lessees of M'Call

Daniel Boardman and others, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Lessees of Reed and Ford, M’Call and others, Defendants in Error. In an ejectment a witness wassailed to prove that'a person who was dead had; at a former trial between the plaintiffs a

31 U.S. 328 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1832

New Jersey v. New York

The State of New Jersey v. The People of the State of New York. At January term 1881, an order was made, giving the state of New York leave to appear in this case on the second day of this term and answer the complainants’ billj and if ther

31 U.S. 323 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1832

Leland v. Wilkinson

Thomas Leland and others v. David Wilkinson. A paper certified by the secretary of state of Rhode Island, and by the governor, under the seal of the state, stating that certain laws were passed by t'ie legislature of that state, and thaf ce

31 U.S. 317 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1832

James Greenleaf's Lessee v. Birth

James Greenleaf’s Lessee, Plaintiff in Error v. James Birth, Defendant in Error. Ejectment. A deed of indenture, duly executed, acknowledged and recorded, was given in evidence by the defendant in an ejectment, which purported to' convey ce

31 U.S. 302 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1832

Green v. Lessee of Neal

Asa Green, Plaintiff in Error v. The Lessee of Henry Neal, Defendant in Error. The case of Patton’s Lessee v. Easton, 1 Wheat. 276, and Powell’s Lessee v. Green, 2 Peters, 240, as to the statutes oflimitations of Tennessee, overruled. In th

31 U.S. 291 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Intellectual Property 1832

Ross v. M'Lung

David Ross, Plaintiff in Error v. Charles M’Lung, Defendant in Error. Construction of the act of the legislature of North Carolina, concerning the registration of deeds, passed in 1715.' The questions which grów out of the language of this

31 U.S. 283 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1832

Conard v. Pacific Insurance

John Conard, Marshal of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania—The United States, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Pacific Insurance Company of New York, Defendants. The case of Conard v. The Atlantic Insurance Company, 1 Peters’s Reports, 386, cit

31 U.S. 262 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed 1832

James M'Donald's Heirs v. Smalley

James M’Donald’s Heirs, Appellants v. Freeman Smalley and others, Appellees. The plaintiffs’ entry aflaml in Ohio was made in the name of a person who-was-dead at the time of the entry. This entry is a nullity in the state of Ohio. The case

31 U.S. 261 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1832

President of the Bank of United States v. Hatch

The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States, Plaintiffs in Error v. William S. Hatch, Defendant in Error. A suit was instituted by the bank against Pearson, the drawer of a bill of exchange indorsed by Hatch, which

31 U.S. 250 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Intellectual Property 1832

Grant v. Raymond

Joseph Grant and others v. E. and H. Raymond. Action for damages for an infringement of a patent rignt, granted to the plaintiff in 1825. The patent recited that a former patent had been issued in 1821, to the same person, for the same impr

31 U.S. 218 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1832

Ex parte Roberts

Ex Parte Joseph Roberts, and Ex Parte George Adshead. Motion for a mandamus to the district judge of the United States for the southern district of New York» to set aside a judgment entered by default, on an inquest finding a forfeiture of

31 U.S. 216 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Civil Rights 1832

M'Arthur v. Porter

Duncan M’Arthur, Plaintiff in Error v. Wesley S. Porter, Defendant in Error. In an ejectment for a tract of land, the declaration described the same by specific metes and bounds. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff, stating the defen

31 U.S. 205 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1832

Cox v. United States

Nathaniel Cox, Nathaniel and James Dick, Plaintiffs in Error v. The United States, Defendants in Error. The United States instituted a suit in the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, according to the p

31 U.S. 172 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1832

Dufau v. Jean Henry Couprey's Heirs

Charles B. Dufau, Plaintiff in Error v. Jean Henry Couprey’s Heirs, Defendants in Error. Motion to dismiss a wiit of error on the ground that one of'the matters put in issue in the court below, did not appear, by the record, to have been de

31 U.S. 170 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Business & Corporate Law 1832

Spring v. Gray

Seth Spring and others, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Executors of William Gray, Defendants in Error. The master of a ship, who with the other members of a mercantile house were owners of the vessel which he commanded, with .the approbation of

31 U.S. 151 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1832

Oliver v. Alexander

Robert Oliver, The Bank of the United States, and the Union Bank of Maryland, Assignees of Smith and Buchanan, Hollins and M’Blair, and John S. Styles, Executor of George Styles, Appellants v. James Alexander and Seventy-seven Others, Seame

31 U.S. 143 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1832

United States v. Paul

The United States v. James Paul. The third section of the act of congress, entitled “ an act more effectually to provide for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States, and for other purposes,” passed March 3,1825, is to be

31 U.S. 141 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1832

Lessee of Sicard v. Davis

Lessee of Stephen Sicard et al. Plaintiffs in Error v. Nancy Davis et al. Defendants in Error. Same v. John Cecil and Robert Smithers. The act of the legislature of Kentucky, passed in 1796, respecting conveyances, reduces into one all the

31 U.S. 124 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Immigration Law 1832

Lessee of Levy v. M'Cartee

Lessee of Mordecai Levy, Elizabeth Levy, Chapman Levy and Rosina his wife, Bella Hart, Bella Cohen, Rhina Mordecai, Flora Levy and Jacob Henry v. Peter M’Cartee. Under the laws of New York, one citizen of the state cannot inherit in the col

31 U.S. 102 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1832

Peirsoll v. Elliott

William Peirsoll and others, Appellants v. James Elliott and others, Appellees. The complainants filed a bill for a perpetual injunction, and to oblige the appellees to deliver up a deed of conveyance of lands, and which deed, in a suit b&f

31 U.S. 95 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1832

Moore v. President of the Bank of Columbia

James Moore, Defendant below, now Plaintiff in Error v. The President, Directors and Company of the Bank of Columbia, Defendants in Error. The principle clearly to be deduced from the decisions of this court on the statute of limitations is

31 U.S. 86 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1832

Smith v. Bell

John Smith T., Plaintiff v. Robert Bell, Defendant. The will of B. G. contained the following clause: “ also, I give to my wife Elizabeth Goodwin, all my personal estate whatsoever and wheresoever, and of what nature, kind and quality soeve

31 U.S. 68 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1832

Henry Miller's Heirs & Devisees v. M'Intyre

Henry Miller’s Heirs and Devisees, Complainants and Appellants v. Jacob and Isaac M’Intyre, Appellees. A bill was filed in 1808 for the purpose of obtaining the legal title to certain lands in Kentucky, and afterwards new’parties were madei

31 U.S. 61 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion