Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1832 Cases
55 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bank of United States v. Dunn
Bank of the United States, Plaintiff in Error v. John O. Dunn, Defendant in error. It is a well settled principle, that no man who is a party to a negotiable instrument, shall be permitted by his own testimony to invalidate it. Having given
Davis v. Packard
Charles A. Davis, Consul General of the King of Saxony, Plaintiff in Error v. Isaac Packard, Henry Disdier and William Morphy, Defendants in Error. Motion to dismiss a writ of error to “ the court for the correction of errors in the state o
United States v. State Bank
The United States v. The State Bank of North Carolina. The right of priority of payment of debts due to the government, is a prerogative of the crown of England, well known to the common law. It is founded, not so much up'on any personal ad
Bank of United States v. Green
Bank of the United States, Plaintiff v. William Green and others, Defendants. Upon a motion of the defendants a rule wa^ given,,in the circuit court of the United States for the district of Ohio,.on the marshal,to show cause why the taxatio
Kirkman v. Hamilton
Thomas Kirkman, Junior, Plaintiff v. John W. Hamilton and others, Defendants. The statute of limitations of North Carolina, passed in 1715, in force in Tennessee, bars the particular actions which it recites, and no others. It does not bar
Bank of United States v. Bank of Washington
The Bank of the United States, Plaintiffs in Error v. The Bank of Washington, Defendants in Error. The defendants in an execution paid to the agents of the plaintiff the amount of the debt, and gave a verbal notice that it was their intenti
Schimmelpennick v. Turner
Gerret Schimmelpennick and Adrian Toe Laer, trading under the firm of R. and J. R. Van Staphorst v. Josiah and Philip Turner. The declaration contained two counts. The first, setting out the cause of action, stated “ for that whereas the sa
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.