Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1833 Cases
41 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
The State of Rhode Island, complainant v. The State of Massachusetts. MR ROBBINS,'solicitor for the complainant, having renewed his motion of last term in this case, prayed the court to award such process, and in such form, as the court may
Ex parte Bradstreet
Ex parte Martha Bradstreet, in the matter of Martha Bradstreet, demandant. Mandamus. In the district court of the northern district of New York, writs of right were prosecuted for lands lying in that district, and neither in the writs, or i
Ward v. Gregory
George W. Ward, and Richard K. Call, register and receiver (U. S.), appellants v. Lewis Gregory. Same, appellants v. Jacob Robinson and F. Swearingen. A mandamus was issued by the superior court oi appeals of the eastern middle district of
Ex parte Madrazzo
Ex parte Juan Madrazzo. Juan Madrazzo, a subject of the king of Spain, filed a libel praying admiralty process against the state of Georgia, alleging that the state was in possession of a certain sum of money, the proceeds of the sale of ce
Heirs of P. F. Dubourg de St Colombe v. United States
The Heirs of P. F. Dubourg de St Colombe, appellants v. The United States. A complex and intricate account is an unfit subject for examination in a court, and ought always to be referred to a commissioner, to be examined by him and reported
Brashear v. West
Walter Brashear, appellant v. Francis West, Thomas M. Willing and Henry Nixon, executors of John Nixon deceased, and Henry Nixon, Samule Mifflin and John Lapseley, assignees of Francis West, appellees. Francis West, Henry Nixon, surviving e
Scott v. Ezra Lunt's Administrator
Richard M. Scott, plaintiff in error v. Ezra Lunt’s Administrator. Action of covenant.brought by the plaintiff in error to recover the amount of certain rents alleged to have been due and in arrear from the defendant since the death of his
Scholefield v. Eichelberger
Joshua Scholefield and John Taylor, plaintiffs in error v. Jesse Eichelberger, surviving partner of John Clemm, defendant in error. Action of assumpsit to recover the balance of an account current for merchandize purchased in England by ord
Ex parte Watkins
Ex parte Tobias Watkins. Habeas corpus. W., at May term 1829 of the circuit court of the district of Columbia, was tried upon three indictments for offences against the United. States, and was sentenced on each to imprisonment for three mon
Morris v. Lessee of Josiah Harmer's Heirs
George Morris and David Gwynne, plaintiffs in error v. The Lessee of Josiah Harmer’s Heirs. Ejectment for a lot of ground in the city of Cincinnati. A question as to the admission of evidence of the declaration of a deceased person, as to b
Lessee of Livingston v. Moore
The Lessee of Edward Livingston and others v. John Moore and others. The titles to lands under, the acts of the legislature of the state of Pennsylvania, providing for the sale of the landed estate of John Nicholson, in satisfaction of the
William Tyrell's Heirs v. Rountree
William Tyrell’s Heirs, plaintiffs in error v. Andrew Rountree and others. Ejectment. On tile 12th of February 1807, an attachment was regularly issued by the court of Williamson county, Tennessee, and, was, on the 13th of the same month, l
United States v. Eighty-Four Boxes of Sugar
In the matter of the United States v. Eighty-four Boxes of Sugar, Tufts and Clarke claimants. The claimants of eighty-four boxes of sugar, seized in the port of New Orleans, for an alleged'breach of the revenue laws, and condemned as forfei
Abner L. Duncan's Heirs & Representatives v. United States
Abner L. Duncan’s Heirs and Representatives, plaintiffs in error v. The United States. Action on a bond executed by William Carson, as paymaster, and signed by A. L. Duncan and John Carson as his sureties, conditioned that William Carson, p
Breedlove v. Nicolet
James W. Breedlove and William L. Robeson, plaintiffs in error v. Theodore Nicolet and J. J. Sigg. Jurisdiction. The plaintiffs, aliens, were residents of the state of Louisiana at the time of the execution of the note sued on in the distri
Barlow v. United States
Joseph Barlow, claimant of eighty-five hogsheads of sugar, appellant v. The United States. Construction of the acts of congress relative to drawback on refined sugar. The legislature did not in the enactments in reference to drawback intend
Owings v. Kincannon
Thomas Deye Owings, and others, appellants v. Andrew Kincannon, appellee. Appeal dismissed because all the parties to the decree in the circuit court had not joined in the appeal to this court. APPEAL from the circuit court of the United St
Hollingsworth Magniac v. Thompson
Hollingsworth Magniac and others, plaintiffs in error v. John R. Thompson. The whole charge of the circuit court was brought up with the record. By the court. This is a practice which this court have uniformly discountenanced, and which the
Peyroux v. Howard
Sylvan Peyroux and others, claimants of steamboat Planter, appellants v. William L. Howard and Francois Varion, libellants. A libel was filed in the district court of the United States for the eastern district of Louisiana, against the stea
Shaw v. Cooper
Joseph Shaw, plaintiff in error v. Joseph Cooper. ction for an alleged violation of a patent for an improvement in guns and fire arms. he letters patent were obtained in 1822; and in 1829, the patentee having surrendered the same for an all
Union Bank v. Magruder
Union Bank of Georgetown v. George B. Magruder. Whether certain facts in reference to an alleged notice to the indorser, and demand of payment of a promissory note by the drawer, amounted to a waiver of the objection to the want of demand a
Davis v. Packard
Charles A. Davis, Consul-General of the King of Saxony, Plaintiff in error v. Isaac Packard, Henry Disdier and William Murphy, defendants. The record of the proceedings in this case, brought up with the writ of error to the court for the co
Vattier v. Hinde
Harles Vattier, Appellant v. Thomas S. Hinde, James B. Hinde, Martha Hinde, and John M. Hinde, infants &c. bill was filed in the circuit court of Ohio, claiming a conveyance of cer tain-real estate in Cincinnati from the defendants, and aft
Barron ex rel. Tiernan v. Mayor of Baltimore
John Barron, survivor of John Craig, for the use of Luke Tiernan, Executor of John Craig v. The Mayor and City Council of Baltimore. The provision in the fifth amendment to the constitution of the United States, declaring that private prope
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.