Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1833

Sampeyreac v. United States

Bernardo Sampeyreac and Joseph Stewart, appellants v. The United States, appellees. Construction of the act of congress passed the 5th of May 1830, entitled “ an act for the further extending the powers of the judges of the superior court o

32 U.S. 222 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1833

Yeaton v. Lenox

William Yeaton and others, appellants v. David Lenox and others. Motion to dismiss an appeal.' A decree was pronounced by the district court of the United States for the district of Alexandria, in December 1829, from which the defendants ap

32 U.S. 220 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1833

Holmes v. Trout

John Holmes, Michael Omealy, Richard Caton, Hugh Thompson, and William Slater, appellants v. Daniel Trout, William Moreland, Walter Moreland, Jeremiah Trout, Jacob Overpeck, and William Buchannan, appellees. Questions on the validity of cer

32 U.S. 171 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Dismissed Estate Planning & Probate 1833

Farmers Bank v. Hooff

Farmers Bank of Alexandria v. John Hooff et al. R. being indebted to the Farmers Bank of Alexandria, on certain promissory notes exceeding in amount one thousand dollars, conveyed to H. a lot of ground in Alexandria, exceeding one thousand

32 U.S. 168 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1833

United States v. Brewster

The United States v. Samuel Brewster. Indictment founded on the eighteenth section of the act of congress, passed on the 15th day of April 1816, entitled “an act to incorporate the subscribers to the Ban]: of the United States.” The indictm

32 U.S. 164 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1833

United States v. Wilson

The United States v. George Wilson. The defendant was indicted for robbing the mail of the United States, and putting the life of the driver ip jeopardy, and the conviction and judgrnent pronounced upon it extended to both, offences. After

32 U.S. 150 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1833

Martin Pickett's Heirs v. Legerwood

Martin Pickett’s Heirs, plaintiffs in error v. Samuel Legerwood et al. The court refused to quash a writ of error on the ground that the record was not filed with the clerk of the court until the month of June .1832, the writ having been re

32 U.S. 144 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1833

United States v. Mills

The United States, v. John B. Mills. he'defendant was indicted upon the twenty-fourth section of the act of . congress of 3d March 1825, entitled “ an act to reduce into one the sev& val acts establishing and regulating the post office depa

32 U.S. 138 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1833

United States v. Turner

The United States v. Abel Turner. Indictment in. the circuit court ot North Carolina for the forgery of, and an - attempt to pass, &c. a certain paper writing in imitation of, and purporting to be a bill or note issued by the president, dir

32 U.S. 132 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1833

Estho v. Lear

Hyppolitus Joseph Augustine Estho et al. v. Benjamin L. Lear, administrator of Thaddeus Kosciuszko. A case not being properly prepared in the circuit court for a hearing, the decree was reversed,/ and the cause remanded, with liberty to the

32 U.S. 130 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1833

Douglass v. Reynolds, Byrne & Co.

James S. Douglass and others, plaintiffs in error v. Reynolds, Byrne and Company, defendants in error. Action upon-the following letter of guarantee, written by the defendants and delivered to the plaintiffs: “ Port Gibson, December 1827. “

32 U.S. 113 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed Business & Corporate Law 1833

Nichols v. Fearson

William S. Nichols, plaintiff in error v. Samuel J. Fearson et al. A promissory note, payable at a future day, given for a bopa fide business transaction, and which note was not made for the purpose of raising money in the market, was sold

32 U.S. 103 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Reversed 1833

Minor v. Tillotson

John Minor, plaintiff in error v. Shurbal Tillotson. What will be deemed sufficient evidence of diligent and sufficient search for a lost or mislaid original paper, to permit a copy to be read as secondary evidence. The rules of evidence ar

32 U.S. 99 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Affirmed Personal Injury 1833

United States v. Percheman

The United States, appellants v. Juan Percheman, appellee. Juan Percheman claimed two thousand acres of land lying in the territory of Florida, by virtue of a grant from the Spanish governor, made in 1815. His title consisted of a petition

32 U.S. 51 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1833

United States v. Fillebrown

The United States, plaintiffs in error v. Thomas Fillebrown, Jun. The United S,tates instituted an action to recover a balance, certified at the treasury, against the defendant on the settlement of his accounts as secretary to the commissio

32 U.S. 28 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Bankruptcy & Debt 1833

United States v. Ripley

The United States, plaintiffs in error v. Eleazar W. Ripley. The United States brought an action against general Ripley for a certain amount of public money he had, as was alleged, failed to account for and pay over as the law required. The

32 U.S. 18 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Estate Planning & Probate 1833

United States v. Macdaniel

The United States, plaintiffs in error v. George Macdaniel. The United States instituted a suit to recover a balance charged on the books pf the treasury department against the defendant, who was a clerk in the navy department, upon a fixed

32 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion