Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1838 Cases
42 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Massachusetts v. Rhode Island
The State of Massachusetts ads. The State of Rhode Island. The state of Massachusetts, after" having appeared'to process issued against her, at the "suit of the State Qf Rhode, Island,, on a bill filed for the settlement of boundary, apd af
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
The State of Rhode Island Providence Plantations, complainants v. the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, defendant. -The Supreme Court has jurisdiction of a hill filed by the state of Rhode Island ,. against the state of Massachusetts, tp ascer
United States v. Delespine's Heirs
The United States, appellants v. Joseph Delespine’s Heirs, Lazarus and others. A translation, by the secretary of the board of land commissioners of Florida, whose duty it.w&s to translate • Spanish documents given in evidence before the bo
Kendall v. United States ex rel. Stokes
Amos Kendall, postmaster general of the United States, plaintiff in error v. The United States, on the relation of William B. Stokes et al. Contracts for carrying the mail of the United States, were made by S. & S., with the postmaster gene
Garcia v. Lee
Manuel Garcia, plaintiff in error v. Samuel Lee. 1Phe"'decision of the Court in the case of Foster and Elam v: Neilson,,2 Peters, 254; by which grants made by-the crown of’Spain,- after the treaty of St'. Ildefonso, of land's west of the ri
Choteau v. Marguerite
Pierre Choteau, Senior, plaintiff in error v. Marguerite, a woman of colour, defendant. Jurisdiction. The Supreme. Court has not jurisdiction of a case brought by a writ óf error from the supreme court of the state of Mississippi; under the
Reynolds v. Douglass
James M. Reynolds, John B. Byrne and William Farriday, merchants, trading under the firm of Reynolds, Byrne & Co. v. James S. Douglass, Thomas G. Singleton and Thomas Going. Commercial guaranty. ‘ The rule is well settled, that the guaranto
Ex parte Sibbald v. United States
Ex parte Charles F. Sibbald, appellee v. The United States, appellants. On an appeal from-the superior court of East Florida by the United States, the decree of-the court of East Florida was in part affirmed; the .title of Sibbald., the app
United States v. Kingsley
The United States v. Zephaniah Kingsley. A grant for land in Florida by Governor Coppinger, on condition that the grantee build a mill within a period fixed in the grant, declared to be void; the grantee not having performed the condition,
Ex parte Emily T. v. City of La Fayette
Ex parte Emily T. and Matilda Poultney, complainants v. The City of La Fayette, Shields, et al. A euhpmna'in' chancery was issued. in the circuit court' of thé United States for the Louisiana district; on -the 15th of July, 1837, returnable
Strother v. Lucas
Daniel F. Strother, plaintiff in error v. John B. C. Lucas, defendant. Ejectment for two lots of ground in St. Louis, Missouri. The plaintiff jiad brought an ejectment, which was before the Court on a writ of error, in 1832, and the judgmen
Bradlie v. Maryland Insurance
Isaac Bradlie and John Gibbons, plaintiffs in error v. The Maryland Insurance Company. Insurance. By the well settled principles of law, in the United States, the state of the facts, and not the state of the information at the time of the a
Hepburn v. Dubois
Andrew D. Hepburn, plaintiff in error v. Jacob Dubois, lessee of Oliver S. Wolcott. The deed of a feme covert, conveying her interest' in lands which she owns in fee, does not pass her interest, by the force of its execution and delivery, a
Ex parte Story v. Story
Ex parte Benjamin Story, in the matter of Louise Livingston, executrix of Edward Livingston, deceased, appellant v. Benjamin Story. A bill of exceptions, is altogether unknown in chancery practice; nbr is a court of chancery bound to inscri
Toland v. Sprague
Henry Toland, plaintiff in error v. Horatio Sprague. Process of foreign attachment cannot-be properly issued by the circuit courts of the United States, in cases where the defendant is domiciled abroad, or not found . within the district in
Galloway v. Finley
James Galloway, Junior, appellant v. Henry R. Finley and David Barr, appellees. C. B., a man resident in Ohio, as an officer in the Virginia line,- during the revolutionary war, was entitled to a.quantity of military land in the -state of O
Jenkins v. Pye
John J. Jenkins and others, appellants v. Sarah M. Pye and Edward Arell Pye, infants, by James B. Pye, their father and next friend, Appellees. The complainants in their bill allege, that á conveyance of her real estate was made by a daught
White v. Turk
James White, plaintiff v. Hiram Turk, James Vaughan, and William Grant. The intention of congress, in passing the act, authorizing a division of opinion of the judges of the circuit courts of the United States to be certified to the Supreme
Lyon v. James Auchincloss & Co.
Benjamin R. Lyon and others, plaintiffs in error v. James Auchincloss and Company. Bail- was entered in the district court of tho'United States for the eastern district of .Louisiana', for a defendant, against whom a suit,was’ brought on ce
N. Rogers & Sons v. Batchelor
N. Rogers & Sons, plaintiffs in error v. James Batchelor and others, administrators of Abel H. Buckholts, deceased. All action of debt was instituted in the district court of the United States, on an obligation under the hands-and seals of
Levy v. Arredondo
Moses E. Levy, appellant v. Fernando de la Maza Arredondo and Joan de Entralgo, appellees. In the superior court of East Florida^ the complainant- filed a bill' claiming compensation for the non-performance of certain contracts for the sale
United States v. Mills' Heirs
The United States, appellants v. William Mills' Heirs. A. grant f land in East'Florida was jnade'by. the governor, before the cession of-Florida by Spain to the. United States, on conditions which were not performed by the grpntep'withm' th
Adams, Cunningham & Co v. Jones
Adams, Cunningham and Company v. Calvin Jones. Where a case is certified fro'm a circuit court of the United States, the judges of the . circuit court having differed in opinion upon questions of law which arose on the trial of the cause, t
Stelle v. Carroll
Beulah Stelle, plaintiff in error v. Daniel Carroll, of Duddington, defendant in error. Dower. The doctrines of the common law, on the subject of dower, although since altered by an act of assembly of Maryland, were Still the law of Marylan
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.