Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1838

Clarke v. White

Joseph S. Clarke and Richard S. Briscoe, appellants v. William G. W. White, appellee. The doctrine of a court of chancery in cases for specific performance; has reference, ordinarily,to executory agreements'for the conveyance of lands; and

37 U.S. 178 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1838

Bradstreet v. Thomas

Martha Bradstreet, plaintiff in error v. Anson Thomas. It is error on thé trial of a-writ, of right,-before the gfand assize, to prevent the introduction of written -evidence; becansé im a trial between the demandant, offering the testimony

37 U.S. 174 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1838

Clarke v. Mathewson

John H. Clarke, administrator of Willard W. Wetmore, appellant v. Henry Mathewson, Cyrus Butler, Edward Carrington, and Samuel Wetmore, appellees. A bijl was filed by W. a citizen of Connecticut, against M. and others, citizens of Rhode Isl

37 U.S. 164 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1838

Zacharie v. Franklin

John Zacharie and Wife, plaintiffs in error v. Henry Franklin and Wife. Under the laws of Louisiana, and the decisions of the courts of that state, a mark for the name, to an instrument, by a person who is unable to write his name, is of th

37 U.S. 151 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1838

Scott v. Lloyd

Charles Scott, bailiff of William S. Moore, plaintiff in error v. John Lloyd, defendant in error. Where the grantor of annuity by deed, has conveyed all his interest in the property charged with the annuity, and an allegation of usury in th

37 U.S. 145 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1838

Sarchet v. United States

Edward Sarchet and others, appellants v. The United States. The United States instituted a'suit, on a bond for duties, in the district court of the southern district of New York; and after a trial and verdict for the United States, judgment

37 U.S. 143 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Insurance Law 1838

Heirs of Wilson v. Life & Fire Insurance

The Heirs of Nicholas Wilson v. The Life and Fire Insurance Company of New York. In certain proceedings for the sale of property mortgaged, the \yidow and children of the deceased owner of the property were made defendants. The district cou

37 U.S. 140 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1838

Beaston v. Farmers' Bank

George Beaston, garnishee of the Elkton Bank of Maryland v. The Farmers’ Bank of Delaware. Priority of the United Stales. .From the language employed in the fifth section of the act of congress of March 3, 1797, giving a priority to debts d

37 U.S. 102 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1838

West v. Brashear

Francis West and others, appellants v. Walter Brashear. A defendant in an appeal, using the copy of the record received frQm.the circuit court lodged by the appellant, cannot have the appeal docketed and dismissed, under-the 3Qth rule of th

37 U.S. 101 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1838

Mayor of Georgetown v. Alexandria Canal Co.

The Mayor, Recorder, Aldermen, and Common Council of Georgetown, appellants v. The Alexandria Canal Company, and William Turnbull, appellees. A bill was filed by the Corporation of Georgetown, on behalf of themselves and the citizens of Geo

37 U.S. 91 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1838

M'Niel v. Holbrook

John M‘Niel, plaintiff in error v. Lowell Holbrook. In an action on four promissory notes, one of which was drawn by the defendant, in favour of the plaintiff, and the others were drawn by the defendant, in favour of other persons who had e

37 U.S. 84 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1838

United States v. Coombs

The United States, plaintiffs v. Lawrence Coombs. Indictment in the- circuit court of the United, States for the southern district of New York, for feloniously stealing a quantity of meYchandise belonging' to the ship Bristol, the ship bein

37 U.S. 72 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Civil Rights 1838

M'Kinney v. Carroll

John M'Kinney, William M'Connell and Kay Moss, plaintiffs in error v. John Carroll. To give the Supreme Court of the United States jurisdiction, under the twenty-fifth section of the judiciary act, in a case brought from the highest court o

37 U.S. 66 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1838

Bradstreet v. Thomas

Martha Bradstreet, plaintiff in error v. Anson Thomas. The demandant, a subject of the king of Great Britain, instituted an action by writ of right, in the district court for the northern district of New-York, against the defendant, a citiz

37 U.S. 59 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1838

Bank of the United States v. Daniel

The Bank of the United States appellants v. James Daniel et al. appellees. A bill of exchange was drawn at Lexington, Kentucky, on James - Daniel, on the I2th of October, 1818, by Robert Griffing, payable at one hundred and twenty days afte

37 U.S. 32 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1838

Benton v. Woolsey

Nathaniel S. Benton, District Attorney of the United States for the northern district of New York v. Melancthon T. Woolsey, the Bank of Utica et al. Thp district attorney of the United States filed an information in his own name, in behalf

37 U.S. 27 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1838

Swayze v. Burke

Lessee of Gabriel Swayze, and Mary his wife, plaintiffs in error v. Robert Burke, D. Sherman, George Jackson, and James Hinsman, defendants Ejectment. ' John Ormsby died in Alleghany county,-Pennsylvania, in December, 3,805, having a son Ol

37 U.S. 11 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1838

United States v. Laub

The United States, plaintiffs in error v. Andrew N. Laub. The United States instituted an action on a treasury transcript Of. the accounts of the defendant, who had been a clerk in the treasury department, and as such, and . as agent under

37 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion