Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1839 Cases
50 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bank of Augusta v. Earle
The Bank of Augusta, Plaintiffs in error, vs. Joseph B. Earle, Defendant in error. The Bank of the United States, Plaintiffs in error, vs. William D. Primrose, Defendant in error. The New Orleans and Carrollton Railroad Company, Plaintiffs
Wilcox v. Jackson
De la Fayette Wilcox, Plaintiff in error, vs. John Jackson, on the demise of Murray M'Connel, Defendant in error. Ejectment for' a tract of land in Cook county, Illinois, being a fractional section, embracing the military post called Fort'D
Meredith v. United States
Jonathan Meredith and Thomas Ellicott, Plaintiffs in error, vs. The United States, Defendants in error. An action was instituted by the United State's, to recover from the assignees' of S. Smith and Buchanan,-insolvent merchants, the duties
Burton v. Smith
Thomas O. Burton, Appellant, vs. William L. Smith and others, Appellees. 'Under the laws of Virginia in relation to lands of which the debtor has an actual seisin, • although there is no statute,in Virginia Which expressly makes a judgment
Carr v. Hoxie
Nathan Carr and others, Appellants, vs. Joseph Hoxie, Appellee. An original decree was made in the Circuit Court of Rhode Island, at Tune term, 1834, and an appeal was taken to January term', 1835, of the Supreme Court. This appeal' was dis
Keene v. Whittaker
Richard Raynall Keene vs. Warren Whittaker and others. A 'case cannot be brought by writ of error ftom a Circuit Court of the United States, upon an agreed statement of facts. The rules of the Supreme Court require that the clerk of the Cir
Bagnell v. Broderick
Carey Bagnell and the Executors of Morgan Byrne, Plaintiffs in error, vs. George W. Broderick, Defendant in error. The plaintiff in error had exhibited, in an action instituted against him in thé Circuit Court of Missouri, evidence conducin
Anthony v. Butler
Barrington Anthony, Marshal of the United States, Plaintiff in error, vs. Cyrus Butler, Defendant in error. A mortgage was .execute!! by D. G. as the agent of the Union Steam Mitt Company, conveying to the mortgagee certain lands in Rhode I
Williams v. Suffolk Insurance
Charles L. Williams vs. The Suffolk Insurance Company. The government of the United States having insisted, and continuing to insist, through its-egular executive authority that the Falkland islands do not constitute any part.of the dominio
Heirs of Emerson v. Hall
The Heirs of William Emerson, Plaintiffs in error, vs. Charles H. Hall, Defendant in error. The Josepha Secunda, was condemned for a violation of the laws of the United States, prohibiting the slave trade; and by a decree, the District Cour
Ex parte Whitney
Ex parte Myra Clarke Whitney. The district judge of the eastern district of Louisiana, while holding a Circuit Court, ordered proceedings on a bilMn equity to be in conformity with the rules of the Courts of . Louisiana, thus disregarding t
New England Insurance v. The Brig Sarah Ann
The New England Insurance Company, vs. The Brig Sarah Ann, Woodbury and others, claimants. The right of the master to sell a vessel stranded, depends on the circumstances under which it is done to justify it. The master must act in good fai
Lupton v. Janney
Ann Lupton, Appellant, vs. Phineas Janney, Executor of David Lupton, the younger, deceased, Appellee. The executor of 1. filed.- his. accounts in. thé Orphans Court of .Alexandria, in 1818 and 1818, and' settled his final, amount in 1821. N
Wilcox v. Hunt
John Wilcox and others, vs. Crester Hunt and others. In the District Court of Louisiana, the defendant pleaded the plea of reconvention, which is authorized by the Code of Practice of Louisiana. The District Court, on the motion of the plai
Story v. Livingston
Benjamin Story, Appellant, vs. Louisa Livingston, Executrix of Edward Livingston, Appellee. Chancery. Strictly, in - Chancery practice, though it is different in some of the states of the ' Union, no exceptions to .a master’s report can Be
Moncure v. Dermott
Richard C. L. Moncure, and Walter P. Conway, Executors of Mary James, Plaintiffs in error, vs. Ann R. Dermott, Defendant in error. An action of covenant was instituted by the executors of M. J. upon an obligation executed ■ by A. R. D., und
Columbian Insurance v. Ashby & Stribling
The Columbian Insurance Company of Alexandria, Plaintiffs in error, vs. Ashby and Stribling and others, Defendants in error. The brig Hope, with a cargo, bound from Alexandria, in the District of Columbia, for Barbadoes, insured in Alexandr
M'Elmoyle ex rel. Bailey v. Cohen
William M‘Elmoyle, for the use of Isaac S. Bailey, vs. John J. Cohen, administrator of Levy Florence. Although i judgment in the Court of a state is not to be regarded in the Courts of her sister states as a foreign judgment, or as merely p
Moore v. Bank of the Metropolis
Thomas P. Moore, Plaintiff in error, vs. The Bank of the Metropolis, Defendants in error. The defendant in an, action in the Circuit Court, had with others, received the proceeds of a joint and several promissory note discounted for them at
Van Ness v. Hyatt
John P. Van Ness, Appellant, vs. Alpheus Hyatt and others, Appellees. The principle of the common law undoubtedly is, that no property but that in which the , debtor has a legal title is liable to be taken in execution; and, accordingly, it
Hardy v. Hoyt
Edward Hardy vs. Jesse Hoyt. Stockings and half-stockings made entirely of silk, imported from Liverpool in October, 1838, were exempted from the payment of duty, by the act of Congress passed March 2, 1833, entitled “An act to modify the a
Ex parte Hoyt
Ex parte Jesse Hoyt, Collector of the Port of New York. Mandamus. The Supreme Court will not issue a mandamus to the district'judge of the southern district of New York, in a case in which the district judge decided that the custody of good
Bend v. Hoyt
William B. Bend vs. Jesse Hoyt. The plaintiff, as the importer of certain merchandise from England, entered the same at the customhouse in New York, on the 29th of March, 1837, as cases containing cotton gloves. He gave ,a bond for the duti
Ex parte Hennen
Ex parte, in the matter of Duncan N. Hennen. Mandamus. Motion'for .a rule on the district judge of the eastern district of Louisiana, . to show cause why a mandamus should not be issued requiring him to restore Duncan N. Hennen to the offic
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.