Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1839 Cases
50 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ex parte Hennen
Ex parte, in the matter of Duncan N. Hennen. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, residing in the fourth Circuit, who, under the act of Congress of 1802, ch. 31, holds the Court at the August term, has not power to grant a rule for a man
Stein v. Bowman
John F. Stein, Plaintiff in error, vs. William Bowman and others, Defendants in Error. Certain German documents were offered in evidence by the plaintiff in the District Court of Louisiana, for the purpose of using such parts of, them as co
Downes & Co. v. Church
Downes and Company vs. Edward B. Church. The plaintiffs in an action on the second set of a foreign hill of exchange, which was pro-' tested for non-acceptance, with the protests thereto attached, can'recover, without producing tire first o
Clark v. Smith
Meriwether L. Clark, Executor, and William P. Clark, George R. H. Clark, and Jefferson Kennerly Clark, an Infant under the age of twenty-one years, by his Guardian ad litem and next Friend, the said George R. H. Clark, Heirs at Law of Willi
Stokes v. Saltonstall
William B. Stokes, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Francis W. Saltonstall, Defendant in Error. In an action against the owner of a stage coach used for carrying passengers, for an injury sustained by one of the passengers by the upsetting of the co
United States v. Hardyman
The United States vs. James E. Hardyman. The defendant was indicted for receiving treasury notes of the United States, stolen from the • United States mail. The indictment, in one of the counts, described one of the treasury notes as bearin
Walker v. Parker
John Walker, Appellant, vs. George Parker and others, Appellees. The testator devised to'his wife one-third of his personal estate forever, for her own proper use and benefit, and also one-third of all his real estate, during her lifetimé,
Ocean Insurance v. Polleys
The Ocean Insurance Company, Plaintiffs in error, vs. William Polleys, Defendant in error. The settled construction given by the Supreme Court to the 25th section of the judiciary act of 1789, is, that to bring a case within the reach of th
Lessee of Reed v. Marsh
Lessee of Samuel Reed, Plaintiff in error, vs. William Marsh, Defendant in error. The certificate of the clerk of the Court, that a motion was made for a new trial, and reasons and certain papers filed on which the motion was founded, which
Wallace v. M'Connell
William Wallace, Plaintiff in Error, vs. Corry M'Connell, Defendant in Error. An action was instituted oh a promissory note against the drawer, by which the drawer promised to.pay at the oiHqe of discount and deposite of the Bank of the Uni
United States v. Heirs of Arredondo
The United States, Appellant, vs. The heirs of F. M. Arredondo, and others, Appellees. A concession of thirty-eight thousatid acres of land was made in 1817, by the governor of East Florida, to F. M. Arredondo, in consideration of services
King v. Thompson
Charles King, Appellant, vs. Josias Thompson and others, heirs at law of George King, deceased, Appellees. A bill was filed claiming a specific performance of an alleged contract to convey a house and lot in Georgetown, for the benefit of t
Bank of the United States v. Peter
The Bank of the United States, Appellants, vs. George W. Peter and others, Appellees. ít is a well settled principle in equity, that a judgment creditor, where he is compelled to payoff prior encumbrances on land to obtain the benefit of hi
Bank of the United States v. Lee
The Bank of the United States, Appellant, vs. Elizabeth Lee, Edmund J. Lee, and Richard Smith, Appellees. R.' B. L. in. 1809, then residing in Virginia, for a valuable consideration, Made a conveyance in trust for the benefit of his wife, o
Bradley v. Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam Packet Co.
William A. Bradley, Plaintiff in error, vs. The Washington, Alexandria, and Georgetown Steam Packet Company, Defendants in error. The plaintiff in error had, by an agreement in writing, hired a steamboat to be put “on the route” from Washin
United States v. Heirs of de la Maza Arredondo
The United States, Appellants, vs. The Heirs of Fernando de la Maza Arredondo, Appellees. A concession, by the Governor of East Honda made before the Florida treaty, in consideration of services, confirméd. APPEAL frota the Superior Court o
United States v. Burgevin
The United States, Appellants, vs. Andrew Burgevin, Appellee. A grant of land in East Florida, by the Spanish governor, on the condition that a water sawmill should be erected on the land, declared void; the Condition of the grant not havin
United States v. Drummond
The United States, Appellant, vs. William Drummond, Appellee. A concession was made by the Governor of Florida, before Florida was .ceded to the United States, on condition that the grantee should erect a water sawmill, “and with the precis
United States v. Levy
The United States, Appellant, vs. Moses E. Levy, Appellee. A grant by'Governor Coppinger, of fourteen thousand fivp hundred acres of land, in East Florida, part of thirty thousand acres, granted in consideration of services to the' crown of
Andrews v. Pond
Joseph J. Andrews, Plaintiff in error, vs. Lewis W. Pond, Thomas M. Converse, and Francis L. Wadsworth, Defendants in error. A bill of exchange, ip payment of a debt due on a protested bill, was taken, in New York, from one Of the parties t
Ross v. Duval
William Ross and Henry King, Plaintiffs in error, James S. Duval and others, Defendants in error. A judgment-was obtained in tile Circuit Court of the UnitedV§tates for the District ofj . Virginia, in December, 1821, and a writ of fieri fac
Smith v. Richards
William R. Smith, Appellant, vs. Guy Richards, Appellee. A bill Was filed in the Circuit Court of the southern district of New York, praying that a contract foy the purchase and sale of a portion of a tract of land in Goochland county, in t
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
The State of Rhode Island vs. The State of Massachusetts. The State of Khode Island, on leave granted at January Term, 1838, to amend a bill previously filed by the state against tile state of Massachusetts, amended the bill at this term, b
Van Ness v. Bank of the United States
John P. Van Ness and William Jones, Plaintiffs in error, vs. The Bank of the United States, Defendant in error. The proceedings of the Courts of- the state of Maryland, and the laws of that state prior to. the passing of laws by Congress pr
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.