Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1840 Cases
45 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Holmes v. Jennison
No. II. George Holmes, Plaintiff in error vs. Silas H. Jennison, Governor of the State of Vermont, and John Starkweather, Sheriff of the County of Washington, in the said State of Vermont, and their successors in office, Defendants in error
Decatur v. Paulding
No. I. Susan Decatur, Plantiff in error, vs. James K. Paulding, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant in error.
Holmes v. Jennison
George Holmes, Plaintiff in error, vs. Silas H. Jennison, Governor of the State of Vermont; and John Starkweather, Sheriff of the County of Washington, in the said State of Vermont, and their successors in office; Defendants in error. In th
United States v. Gratiot
The United States, Plaintiff in error, vs. John P. Gratiot, Robert Burton, Charles S. Hempstead, and Dickerson B. Moorehouse, Defendants in error. The United States instituted an action on a bond given by the defendants, conditioned that ce
United States v. Stone
The United States vs. Samuel B. Stone. Action in the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York, by the United States againstythe defendant, for a penalty under the act of 1838, “to provide for the better secu
Decatur v. Paulding
Susan Decatur, Plaintiff in error, vs. James K. Paulding, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant in error. On the 3d of March, 1837, Congress passed an act giving to the widow of apy 'officer who had died in the naval service of the United States
William & James Brown & Co. v. M'Gran
William and James Brown and Company, Plaintiffs in error, vs. Thomas M'Gran; Defendant in error. An action was instituted against the consignees of two hundred bales of cotton, shipped by the direction of the owner to Liverpool, on which th
United States v. Heirs of Waterman
The United States, Appellants, vs. The Heirs of Eleazer Waterman, Appellees. A grant of land by the government of Florida, made before the cession of Florida to the United States by Spain, confirmed.1 every point involved in the ease having
United States v. Morris
The United States vs. Isaac Morris. Indictment under the second and third sections of the act of Congress, entitled, “An Act to prohibit the carrying on the Slave-trade, from thé United States to any foreign Place or Country;” passed'10th M
Philadelphia & Trenton Railroad v. Stimpson
The Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad Company, Plaintiffs in error, vs. James Stimpson, Defendant in error. Action for the violation of a patent right, granted to the patentee for “ a new and useful improvement in turning short curves on ra
United States v. Wood
The United States vs. Samuel R. Wood. The defendant was indicted for perjury in falsely taking and swearing “the owner’s oath, in cases where goods have been actually purchased,” as prescribed by the fourth' section pf the supplementary col
Lessee of Pollard's heirs v. Kibbe
Lessee of William Pollard's heirs, &c., Plaintiffs in error, vs. Gaius Kibbe, Defendant in error. Action of ejectment in the state Court of Alabama, for a tot of ground in the city of Mobile. The plaintiff claimed the title to the lot under
United States v. Wiggins
The United States, Appellants, vs. Elizabeth Wiggins, Appellee. A grant 'of land by Estrada, the Governor of East Florida, was made on the 1st of Au- . gust, 1815, to Elizabeth .Wiggins, on her petition, stating, that “ owing to the diminut
Games v. Stiles ex dem. Dunn
John F. Games and Nathan Gilbert, Plaintiffs in error, vs. John Stiles, ex dem. of Walter Dunn, deceased, Defendant in error. A deed was executed in Glasgow, Scotland, by which land in Ohio, which had bqen patented tp David Buchanan by. the
Fowler v. Brantly
Samuel L. Fowler, Plaintiff in error, vs. Harris Brantly and others, Defendants in error. Action on a promissory note for two thousand dollars, drawn for the purpose of being discounted at the Branch Bank at Mpbile, payable'to the cashier o
United States v. Knight
The United States, Plaintiff in error, vs. Jacob Knight, Benjamin Knight, Isaac Knight, and Edward Knight, Defendants in error. Action on a bond given tb the United States for the liberty, of the jail yard in, Portland, in the state of Main
Irvine ex rel. Lumberman's Bank v. Lowry
Guy C. Irvine, for the use of The Lumberman’s Bank at Warren, vs. Nathaniel A. Lowry. An action was brouglit by toreign attachment, in the Court of Common Pleas of Warren county, Pennsylvania, in the.name of a citizen of Pennsylvania, for t
De Valengin's Administrators v. Duffy
Albert P. De Valengin’s Administrators, Plaintiffs in error, vs. John H. Duffy, Defendant in error. It has been frequently held, that the device of covering properly as neutral, when in truth it was belligerent) is not contrary to the laws
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
The State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Complainant, vs. The State of Massachusetts, Defendant. By a rule of the Supreme Court, the practice of the English Courts of Chancery is the practice in the Courts of Equity of the Unit
Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant
Samuel Sprigg, Appellant, vs. The Bank of Mount Pleasant, Appellee. The principles decided in the case of Sprigg vs. The Bank of Mount Pleasant, reported in 10 Peters, 257, examined and affirmed. It is equally well settled in Courts of Equi
Lessee of Brewer v. Blougher
The Lessee of Henry Brewer, Plaintiff in error, vs. Jacob Blougher and Daniel Blougher, Defendants in error. Construction of the act of the legislature of Maryland, passed December session, 1825, entitled, “ An Act relating to Illegitimate
Taylor v. Longworth
James Taylor, Appellant, vs. Nicholas Longworth and Thomas D. Carneal, Appellees. Specific performance of a contract by T., for the sale by. him of a lot of- ground in the city of Cincinnati, was asked, by a bill filed in the Circuit Court
Keene v. Whitaker
Richard Raynal Keene, Plaintiff in error, vs. Warren Whitaker, Laura Wade, George Dougherty, Francis Marks, and C. Cunningham, Defendants in error. The case of Foster and Elam vs. Neilsofi, 2 Peters, 254; and Garcia vs. Lee, 42 Peters, 511,
Edmonds v. Crenshaw
Jefferson L. Edmonds and others, Appellants, vs. Anderson Crenshaw, Appellee. Where there are two executors in a will, it is clear that each has a right to receive the debts due to the estate, and all other assets which shall come into his
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.