Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1840 Cases
45 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Walden v. Bodley
Ambrose Walden and others, Appellants, vs. Henry I. Bodley and others, Appellees. There are cases in Chancery where amendments are permitted at any stage or progress- of the cause, as where an essential party has been omitted: but amendment
Lessee of Walden v. Craig's Heirs
The Lessee of Ambrose Walden, Plaintiff in error, vs. John Craig’s Heirs and others, Defendants in error. In a scire facias to revive a judgment in ejectment, where it is stated that the term recovered is yet unexpired, this is sufficient.
Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer
The Bank of Alexandria, Plaintiff in error, vs. Edward and Francis Dyer, Defendants in error. An action was instituted iy the Bank of Alexandria, in the county of Alexandria, against the defendants, residents in the county of Washington, in
Preston v. Keene
Isaac T. Preston, Executor of James Brown, deceased, Plaintiff in error, vs. Richard R. Keene, Defendant in error. Louisiana. A paper was executed by R. R. K., of the city of New Orleans, stating that the grantor, for, and in consideration
Runyan v. Lessee of Coster
George Runyan, Plaintiff in error, vs. The Lessee of John G. Coster and Thomas K. Mercien, who survived John Hone, Defendant in error. The legislature of the state of New York, on the 18th of April, 1823, incorporated “The New York and Schu
Atkins v. N. & J. Dick & Co.
James Atkins, Appellant, vs. N. and J. Dick and Company, Appellees. A bill for an injunction was filed, alleging that the jparties who had obtained a judgment at law for the amount of . a bill of exchange, of which the complainant- was endo
Peters v. Warren Insurance
John Peters, and John Peters, Jr., Plaintiffs, vs. The Warren Insurance Company, Defendants. Insurance. Insurance was made to the amount.of eight thousand dollars on the ship Paragon, for one year. The policy contained.the usual risks,'and
Frevall v. Bache
Peter E. Frevall, Appellant, vs. Franklin Bache, Administrator of John Dabadie, deceased, Appellee. A claim for the sum awarded by the commissioners under the treaty of indemnity with France of July fourth, 1831. The powers and duties of th
Remington v. Linthicum
William Remington, Plaintiff in error, vs. Otho M. Linthicum, Defendant in error. A sale of land by the sheriff, under the laws of Maryland, seized under a fieri facias, transfers the legal estate to the vendee by operation of law, and does
Carr v. Duval
William A. Carr, Appellant, vs. Samuel H. Duval and others, Appellees. A decree for a specific performance of a contract to sell lands, refused, because a definite and certain contract was not made; and because the ¡rarty who claimed the pe
Suydam v. Broadnax
Henry A. Suydam and William Boyd, Plaintiffs in error, vs. Robert Broadnax and Isaac Newton, Administrators of David Newton, deceased, Defendants in error. The plaintiffs, merchants of New York, instituted a suit'in the Circuit Court of Ala
Commercial & Rail Road Bank v. Slocomb, Richards & Co.
The Commercial and Rail Road Bank of Vicksburg, Plaintiff in error, vs. Slocomb, Richards and Company, Defendants in error. An action was brought in the Circuit Court of Mississippi, against the Commercial and ■ Rail Road Bank of Vicksburg,
Commonwealth Bank v. Griffith
The Commonwealth Bank of Kentucky, Plaintiff in error, vs. Thomas Griffith and others, Defendants in error. Under the twenty-fifth section ofthe Judiciary Act ofl789,' three things are necessary to . give the Supreme Court jurisdiction of.
West v. Brashear
Francis West and others, Appellants, vs. Walter Brashear, Appellee. The mandate of the Supreme Court to the Circuit Court must be its guide in executing the judgment or decree on which.it issued. The mandate is the judgment of the Supreme C
Mitchell v. Lenox
John S. Mitchell, Executor and Devisee of Andrew Mitchell deceased, Plaintiff in error, vs. Robert Lenox and others, Defendants in error. The fourth article qf the Constitution of the United States, which declares that “ Full faith and cred
Smith v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.
Joseph Smith, Appellant, vs. The Chesapeake and Ohio Canal Company, Appellees. The legislatures of Virginia and Maryland authorized the surrender of the charter granted by those states to the Potbmac Company to be made to the Chesapeake and
Covington v. Comstock
William Covington, Plaintiff in error, vs. David A. Comstock, Defendant in error. An action was instituted in the QjrctSt Court of Mississippi, on a promissory note, dated at and pray able in New York.., 'The 'declaration, omilted to state
Kane v. Paul
Elias Kane, Plaintiff in error, vs. Gabriel Paul, Executor of Edward Coursault, deceased. Letters testamentary to the estate, of Edward Coursault, a merchant, who had died at Baltimore, were granted to Gabriel Paul, one of the executors nam
President of Bank of the Metropolis v. Guttschlick
The President and Directors of The Bank of the Metropolis, Plaintiff in error, vs. Erastus Guttschlick, Defendant in error. Action on an agreement in writing, by which Guttschlick had purchased a lot of ground in the city of Washington, fro
Lessee of Lattimer v. Poteet
Lessee of Margaret Lattimer and others, Plaintiffs in error, vs. William Poteet, Defendant in error. ■Ejectment for forty-niné thousand acres óf iand in the state' of North Carolina, claimed by the plaintiffs under a grant from the state, d
Evans v. Gee
Joseph Evans, Plaintiff in error, vs. Sterling H. Gee, Defendant in error. It is the settled doctrine of the Supreme Court.of the United States that a writ of error does not lie from the Circuit Court,on a refusal of a motion to .quash an e
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.