Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1846 Cases
46 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wilson v. Turner
James G. Wilson, Complainant and Appellant, v. Joseph Turner, Junior, and John C. Turner, Defendants. The decision of the court in the two preceding cases, namely/that where a patent is renewed under the. act of 1836, an assignee under the
Simpson v. Wilson
Andrew P. Simpson, Joseph Forsyth, and Bagdad Mills, Appellants, v. James G. Wilson. The decision of the court in the preceding case of Wilson v. Rousseau et ah, namely, that when a patent is renewed under the act of 1836, an assignee under
Wilson v. Rousseau
James G. Wilson. Plaintiff, v. Lewis Rousseau and Charles Easton. The eighteenth section of the. patent act of 1836 authorized the extension of a patent, on the application of the executor or administrator of a deceased patentee. Such, an e
Holliday v. Batson
Robert Holliday et al. v. Joseph N. Batson et al. In order to entitle a party to have a case docketed and dismissed, under the forty-third rule of court, the certificate of- the clerk of the court below must set forth an accurate titling of
Hardeman v. Anderson
William Hardeman and D. Hardeman, Plaintiffs in error, v. Edward Anderson, Defendant. After a case has been docketed and dismissed under the forty-third rule of court, and the plaintiff in error sues out another writ of error, this court wi
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts
The State of Rhode Island, Complainant, v. The State of Massachusetts, Defendant. The grant of Massachusetts, confirmed in 1629, included the territory “ lying within the space of three English miles on the south part of Charles River, or o
Hunt v. Palao
John Hunt, Plaintiff in error, v. J. & M. Palao, Defendants. Upon the admission of Florida as a State, the records of the former Territorial Court of Appeals were directed by a law of the State to be deposited for safe keeping with the cler
Bradford v. Williams
Edward Bradford, Plaintiff in error, v. Robert W. Williams, Defendant, and John Judge, Plaintiff in error, v. Robert W. Williams, Defendant. By a statute of Florida, where suit is brought upon a bond, the plaintitf need not prove its execut
Barry v. Mercein
John A. Barry, Plaintiff in error, v. Mary Mercein and Eliza Ann Barry, Defendants. After a case has been called, and placed at the foot of the docket, the court cannot take it -up, on motion, and assign a day for its argument, when other c
United States v. Rogers
The United States, Plaintiffs, v. William S. Rogers. The United States have adopted the principle originally established by European nations, namely, that the aboriginal tribes of Indians m North America are not regarded as the owners of th
Michoud v. Girod
Antoine Michoud, Joseph Marie Girod, Gabriel Montamat, Felix Grima, Jean B. Dejan, aine, Denis Prieur, Charles Claiborne, Mandeville Marigny, Madam E. Grima, Widow Sabatier, A. Fournier, E. Mazureau, E. Rivolet, Claude Gurlie, The Mayor of
Downes v. Scott
Richard Charles Downes, Plaintiff in error, v. William S. Scott, Defendant. The second section of the act of the 29th of May, 1830, providing, that “ if two or more persons be settled Upon the same quarter-section-, the same may be divided
Aspden v. Nixon
Aspden and others Complainants, v. Nixon and others, Defendants. Where a person domiciled in England died, leaving property both in England and Pennsylvania, and the executor took out letters testamentary in both countries, in a suit in Eng
Brown v. Union Bank of Florida
Thomas Brown, Plaintiff in error, v. The Union Bank of Florida, Defendant in error. Where there has been no service of a citation, or no final judgment in the court - ■ below, the case must be dismissed on motion. This case was brought up,
Les Bois v. Bramell
Marie Nicolle Les Bois, Plaintiff in error, v. Samuel Bramell, Defendant. A private survey of land, claimed under an .old Spanish concession and presented to the board of commissioners appointed under, the act of 1805, is not conclusive aga
Mackay v. Dillon
Isabella L. Mackay, Executrix of James Mackay, Zeno Mackay, George Anthony Mackay, James Bennett Mackay, Reuben Coleman and Eliza Lucy, his wife, William Coleman and Amelia Ann, his wife, Louis Guyon and Mary Catherine, his wife, David Bowl
Smyth v. Strader
Samuel Smyth, Plaintiff in error, v. Daniel P. Strader, James Perrine, and John H. Woodcock, late partners, under the firm of Strader, Perrine, & Co. The statutes of Alabama require the negotiability and character of bills of exchange, fore
Stimpson v. West Chester Railroad
James Stimpson, Plaintiff in error, v. The West Chester Railroad Company, Defendants. The practice of excepting, generaily, to a charge of the court to the jury, without • setting out, specifically, the points .excepted to, censured. The wr
Foxcroft v. Mallett
Joseph E. Foxcroft, Plaintiff in error, v. David Mallett, Defendant. •Where a township of land was granted to a college upon condition (amongst oth- • ers) that the grantees should give security that they would place a certain number of set
Harris v. Robinson
Benjamin D. Harris, Plaintiff in error, v. James Robinson, Defendant in error. In the case of a protested note, it is not necessary for the holder himself to give notice to the indorser, but a notary or any other agent may do it. The object
Rankin v. Hoyt
Alexander Rankin, Cunningham Smith, George C. C. Thurger, and John McCall, Plaintiffs in error, v. Jesse Hoyt. Under the act of 1832, the collector had power to direct wool to be appraised, for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not it
Cookendorfer v. Preston
Thomas Cookendorfer, Plaintiff in error, v. Anthony Preston, Defendant in error. In an action brought by the indorsee against the indorser of a promissory note, which had been deposited in a-bank for collection, the notary public who made t
Knox v. Smith
John Knox, James Boggs, and James A. Knox, trading under the firm of Knox, Boggs, & Co., Appellants, v. Peyton Smith and others, Defendants. A bill in chancery which recites, that the complainants had recovered a judgment at law in a court
Zeller's Lessee v. Eckert
Zeller’s Lessee v. Jacob K. Eckert and others. Under a will which devised land to the son of the testator, and provided that the widow should continue in possession and occupation of the premises until the son arrived at the age of fifteen
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.