Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1846 Cases
46 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. McLemore
The United States, Appellant, v. John C. McLemore. Although a Circuit Court, sitting as a court of law, may direct credits to be given on a judgment in favor of the United States, and consequently examine the grounds on which such an entry
Musson v. Lake
Michael Musson and George O. Hall, surviving partners of William Noll, Plaintiffs, v. William A. Lake. By the law merchant, when a demand of payment is made upon the drawee of a foreign bill of exchange, the bill itself must be exhibited. N
Buckley v. United States
James Buckley, Claimant of three bales and eight cases of cloth, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. In the trial of a cause where goods had been seized upon suspicion of being fraudulently imported, it was proper to allow to go to th
Clifton v. United States
Charles Clifton, Claimant, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. Upon the trial of a cause where goods had been seized upon suspicion of being fraudulently imported, and the United States had shown sufficient ground for an opinion of th
Agricultural Bank of Mississippi v. Rice
The Agricultural Bank of Mississippi and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. Charles Rice and Mary his wife, and Martha Phipps, Defendants. A bond for the conveyance of land does not transfer the legal title, so as to serve as a defence in an a
Carpenter v. Providence Washington Insurance
Jeremiah Carpenter, Appellant, v. The Providence Washington Insurance Company. A policy of insurance contained a stipulation, that if the insured then had, or thereafter should have, any other insurance 'upon the same property, notice there
Jourdan v. Barrett
Noel Jourdan and Joseph Landry, Plaintiffs in error, v. Thomas Barrett et al. Under the former government of Louisiana, the regulations of O’Reilly, Gajoso, and Morales recognized the equitable claim of the owners of tracts or land fronting
Stockton v. Bishop
Lucius W. Stockton and Daniel Moore, Plaintiffs in error, v. Harriet Bishop. Where a count in a declaration is defective on account of dates being left blank, but the party has pleaded and gone to trial, the presumption, is that the proof s
Garland v. Davis
Hugh A. Garland, Plaintiff in error, v. George M. Davis, Defendant. This was an action on the case, brought by Davis against Garland, the former clerk of the House of Representatives. The declaration set out, by way of inducement, a contrac
Brandon v. Loftus
Gerard C. Brandon, Plaintiff in error, v. Ralph W. Loftus and Floyd Whitehead, Defendants. Under the statutes of Mississippi, providing for the admission of the evidenee of a notary public with regard to a protested note, directing the form
Garrard v. Lessee of Reynolds
Daniel Garrard, Plaintiff in error, v. Lessee of Henry Reynolds et al. In an action of ejectment, where two of the plaintiff’s lessors were married women, and the demise was laid in the declaration to have been on the 1st of January, 1815,
Paige v. Sessions
John C. Paige, Plaintiff in error, v. Martha A. Sessions. The decision of this court in the case of Price t>. Sessions (3 Howard, 624) reviewed and confirmed. This case was brought up,-by writ of error, from the Circuit Court of the United
Gratiot v. United States
Charles Gratiot, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. The 67th article of the general regulations of the army, published in 1831, recognizes two disbursing officers upon fortifications; namely, tbe agent of fortifications and the super
Erwin's Lessee v. Dundas
James Erwin’s Lessee, Plaintiff in error, v. James Dundas et al. Although, by the law of. Alabama, where an execution has issued during the lifetime of a defendant, but has not been actually levied, an alias or plvries may go after his deat
Maney v. Porter
Thomas Maney, and others, Plaintiffs in error, v. Thomas J. Porter, Defendant. The decision of a state court upon the merits of a controversy between two parties, one of whom had sold, and the other purchased, an interest in lands which, it
Beals v. Hale
Thomas Beals, Plaintiff, v. Felicite Hale, Defendant. There were two statutes of the State of Michigan, both passed on the same day, namely, the 12th of April, 1827. One was “ An Act concerning Deeds and Conveyances,” which directed that su
Spalding v. People ex rel. Backus
Lyman A. Spalding, Plaintiff in error, v. The People of the State of New York, ex rel. Frederic F. Backus, Defendants. This case whs brought up from the. Supreme Court for the Trial of Impeachments and the C orrection of Errors of the S tat
Buchanan v. Alexander
McKean Buchanan, Plaintiff in error, v. James Alexander. MoReyin the hands of a purser, although it may be due to seamen, is not liable to an attachment by the creditors.ofthose seamen.. A purser cannot be distinguished from any other disbu
Levi v. Thompson
Alexander Levi v. John Thompson et al. The holder of a register’s certificate of the purchase of a lot in the town of Dubuque, lawfully acquired, and issued by the register under the two acts of 2d July, 1836, and 3d March, 1837, has such a
Tombigbee Railroad v. Kneeland
The Tombigbee Railroad Company v. William H. Kneeland. A corporation, created by the laws of another State, can sue in Alabama upon a contract made in that State. The decision of this court, in 13 Peters, 519, reviewed and confirmed. This c
Brown v. Clarke
James Brown, Plaintiff in error, v. John Clarke, Defendant. By the law of -Mississippi, a judgment is a lien upon personal as well as real estate -from the time of its rendition. Where there has been a judgment, an execution levied upon per
Gwinn v. Buchanan, Hagan, & Co. ex rel. William Holliday & Co.
William M. Gwinn, Marshal, Plaintiff in error, v. Buchanan, Hagan, & Co., for the use of William Holliday & Co. A plaintiff has a right to direct a deputy-marshal to receive a certain description of money in satisfaction of an execution. Bu
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.