Find court opinions that match your case.

Outcome n/a 1850

Missouri v. Iowa

The State of Missouri, Complainant, v. The State of Iowa, Respondent, — Original Bill. The State of Iowa, Complainant, v. The State of Missouri, Respondent. — Cross Bill. The report of the commissioners appointed hy this court in 7 Howard,

51 U.S. 1 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Bennett v. Butterworth

John H. Bennett, Plaintiff in error, v. Samuel F. Butterworth. In Texas, the common law has been adopted, but the forms and rules of pleading in common law cases have not; and although the forms of proceedings and practice in the State cour

52 U.S. 669 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1850

United States v. Turner

The United States, Appellants, v. Sarah Turner, the Wife of Jared D. Tyler, who is authorized and assisted herein by her said Husband; Eliza Turner, Wife of John A. Quitman, who is in like manner authorized and assisted by her said Husband;

52 U.S. 663 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

United States v. Livingston

The United States, Appellants, v. Louise Livingston, the Widow and sole Executrix of the last Will and Testament of Edward Livingston, deceased, and Cora Livingston, the only Child and forced Heir of said Edward Livingston, and the Wife of

52 U.S. 662 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Mayor of Philadelphia

The United States, Appellants, v. The Mayor, Aldermen, and Inhabitants of the Cities of Philadelphia and New Orleans. The decision of this court in the United States v. Eeynes (9 Howard, 127), again affirmed, to wit, that under the acts of

52 U.S. 609 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1850

Hogg v. Emerson

Peter Hogg and Cornelius H. Delamater, Plaintiffs in error, v. John B. Emerson. The decision of this court in the case of Hogg et al. v. Emerson, 6 Howard, 437, reviewed and affirmed. The specification of Emersons patent 11 for certain impr

52 U.S. 587 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Larman v. Tisdale's Heirs

Isaac Larman, Plaintiff in error, v. James Tisdale’s Heirs. The fifty-fourth rule of this court,requiring an appearance to be entered on or before ■ the second day of the term next succeeding that at which the casé is docketed, does not inc

52 U.S. 586 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Power's Heirs

The United States, Appellants, v. Thomas Power’s Heirs. The twelfth section of the regulations of O’Reilly in 17.70 required, that there should be .an order of survey, a proces verbal by1 the surveyor of the province, three copies of the pl

52 U.S. 570 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

United States v. Hughes

The United States, Appellants, v. David M. Hughes, Robert Sewall, and Franklin Hudson, a Minor, by his Tutor, Holmes Hutchinson. Where a person entered land according to law, but omitted to obtain a patent for it, and another person afterwa

52 U.S. 552 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Bankruptcy & Debt 1850

Gill v. Oliver's Executors

George M. Gill, Trustee, &c., of Lyde Goodwin, v. Robert Oliver’s Executors, and Glenn and Perrine, Trustees. In 1839’a treaty was made between the United States and Mexico, providing for the “ adjustment of claims of citizens of the United

52 U.S. 529 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.

The State of Pennsylvania, Complainant, v. The Wheeling and Belmont Bridge Company, Wm. Ottisan, and George Craft. — Bill in Chancery. A day assigned for the argument, at the next term, of á cause upon the original docket of this «court. Or

52 U.S. 528 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1850

Spear v. Place

Arthur Spear, Claimant of the Schooner Lucy Ann and Cargo, Appellant, v. Henry Place, Libellant, for himself and others. Where the admiralty court decreed-that a vessel should pay salvage to the amount of one fifth of her value, and that va

52 U.S. 522 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1850

Randon v. Toby

David Randon, Plaintiff in error, v. Thomas Toby. An agreement by a debtor to apply a certain portion of his crops towards the extinguishment of the debt in consideration of further indulgence, will take a case out of the statute of limitat

52 U.S. 493 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1850

Conrad v. Griffey

Frederic D. Conrad, Plaintiff in error, v. David Griffey. Where a witness was- examined for the plaintiff, and the defendant offered in evidence declarations which he had made of a contradictory character, and then the plaintiff offered' to

52 U.S. 480 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Business & Corporate Law 1850

Buren v. Digges ex rel. Libbey

William H. Van Buren, Plaintiff in error, v. William H. Digges, Use of Joseph Libbey. Where a contractor engaged to build a house for a certain sum of money, and the owner of the house, when sued, offered to prove that there were' various o

52 U.S. 461 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Personal Injury 1850

Webster v. Reid

Joseph Webster, Plaintiff in Error, v. Hugh T. Reid. Where a judgment was rendered hy the Supreme Court for Iowa Territory and the record certified to this court by the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa, after her admission into the Union,

52 U.S. 437 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Moore v. Brown

Joshua J. Moore, Plaintiff, v. James Brown, Alfred Brown, Harmon Hogan, and Joseph Froward. According to the statute of limitations passed by the State of Illinois, a defendant in ejectment who had been in possession of the land by actual r

52 U.S. 414 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Tax Law 1850

Clements v. Berry

Jesse B. Clements, Plaintiff in Error, v. Daniel Berry. Where the marshal of the United States had levied an execution upon certain property under a judgment in the Circuit Court, which was taken out of his custody by a writ of replevin iss

52 U.S. 398 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Tax Law 1850

Fowler v. Merrill

Absalom Fowler and Noah H. Badgett, Appellants, v. Ayres P. Merrill. The act of Congress passed on the 24tb of September, 1789 (1 Stat. atLai'ge, 88, 89), provides that ex parte depositions may be taken before a judge of a County Court. Whe

52 U.S. 375 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Business & Corporate Law 1850

Parks v. Ross

George W. Parks, Administrator of Samuel Parks, v. John Ross. In some of the States it is the practice, after the evidence for the plaintiff is closed, for the defendant to pray the court to instruct the jury that there is no evidence upon

52 U.S. 362 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded Intellectual Property 1850

Den v. Baskerville

John Den, Lessee of Polly Weatherhead, Plaintiff in error, v. John Baskerville, John White, John Parker, Peter Haynes, William Stewart, Nancy Stewart, Nelson B. Turner, Jacob Gallaspie, Peter Bryson, Benjamin Parrish, William Johnson, Reube

52 U.S. 329 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a Intellectual Property 1850

Van Rensselaer v. Kearney

Jeremiah Van Rensselaer, Appellant, v. Philip Kearney and Frederic De Peyster, Trustees and Executors of John Watts, deceased, Catherine G. Visscher, Cornelius G. Van Rensselaer, and Glen Van Rensselaer, Defendants. In 1786 the legislature

52 U.S. 297 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Remanded 1850

Phillips v. Preston

George W. Phillips, Plaintiff in error, v. John S. Preston. A writ of error abated where the death of the plaintiff in error was suggested, and leave granted to make proper parties at December term, 1846, representatives not yet having been

52 U.S. 294 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion

Outcome n/a 1850

Florida v. Georgia

The State of Florida, Complainant, v. The State of Georgia Bill in Chancery. A bill by the State of Florida against the State of Georgia ordered to he filed, .and process of subpoena directed to be issued against the State of Georgia.

52 U.S. 293 Supreme Court of the United States Read opinion