Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1850 Cases
169 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Boyd v. Scott
Ex parte: In the Matter of Early Boyd, Plaintiff in error, v. William Scott and William Greene. — In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Alabama. A motion on the part of the defendants in error, for
Reeside v. Walker
Mary Reeside, Executrix of James Reeside, Plaintiff in error, v. Robert J. Walker, Secretary of the Treasury of the United States. According to the practice in Pennsylvania, where a defendant pleads set-off, the jury are allowed to find in
Hotchkiss v. Greenwood
Julia P. Hotchkiss, Executrix of John G. Hotchkiss, deceased, John A. Davenport, and John W. Quincy, Plaintiffs in error, v. Miles Greenwood and Thomas Wood, Partners in Trade under the name of M. Greenwood & Co. A patent granted for a “ ne
Stockton v. Ford
Richard C. Stockton, Appellant, v. James C. Ford. Where there was a judgment which had been recorded under the laws of Louisiana, and thus made equivalent to a mortgage upon the property of the debtor, and the plaintiff assigned this judgme
Cotton v. United States
Loftin Cotton, Plaintiff in error, v. The United States. The United States hare a right to bring an action of trespass gt-nre clausum fregit "against a person for cutting and carrying away .trees from the public lands. This case was brought
Warner v. Martin
John A. Warner, a Citizen of the State of Pennsylvania; John A. Warner and Company, Citizens of the same State; and William Heald, Jacob Heald, residing out of the Jurisdiction of the Circuit Court of Pennsylvania, Samuel Woodward, and A. J
Brooks v. Norris
Jehiel Brooks, Plaintiff in error, v. Samuel Norris. Where -a judgment was rendered on the 25th of October, 1843, and a writ of error allowed on the 19th of October, 1848, but not issued and filed until the 4th of November following, more t
Bevins v. Ramsey
Williams C. Bevins and Oliver P. Earle, surviving Partners of the Firm of Bevins, Earle, & Co., who sue for the use of Oliver P. Earle, Appellants, v. William B. A. Ramsey, Robert Craighead, James P. N. Craighead, Thomas W. Humes, and James
Hortsman v. Henshaw
John Hortsman, Plaintiff in error, v. John Henshaw, William Ward, and Joseph W. Ward, Merchants and Copartners, doing business under the Firm and Style of Henshaw Ward, & Co., Defendants in error. Where a bill of exchange had upon it the fo
D'Arcy v. Ketchum
James D’Arcy, Plaintiff in error, v. Morris Ketchum, Thomas Rogers, and Edward Bement, Copartners, trading under the Name and Firm of Ketchum, Rogers, and Bement. A statute of the State of New York provides, that, where joint debtors aré su
Gruner v. United States
Erich Christian Ludwig Gruner, Claimant of the Schooner Fairy, her Tackle, &c., Appellant, v. The United States. Where a vessel was libelled in the District Court and sold by agreement of partie», and the proceeds of sale amounted only to $
United States v. Morgan
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. Thomas Gibbes Morgan, Thomas W. Chinn, Micajah Courtney, Josiah Barker, and the Heirs and legal Representatives of John Davenport, deceased. Although a bill o.f exceptions is imperfectly drawn, yet
McGill v. Armour
Penelope McGill, Plaintiff in error, v. Josephine H. Armour. Where a creditor brought an action against an executrix in the Circuit Court of the United States for Louisiana, and the petition only averred that the petitioner was shown to be
McCoy v. Rhodes
James McCoy, Appellant, v. Zachariah Rhodes and his Wife, Luminda Montgomery. Where a bill in chancery alleges- that certain lands were entered in the name of- a third person, with a view to cover them from the creditors of the person who h
Lecompte v. United States
Ambrose Lecompte, Appellant, v. The United States. Where the petition for’ a Spanish concession was for a tract of land without any definite boundaries, and the petition was referred to the solicitor-general, with instructions to put the pe
Blanc v. Lafayette
Evariste Blanc, Plaintiff in error, v. George W. Lafayette and John Hagan. In 1816 .the register and receiver of a land dee, acting under the authority of a law, reported as follows : “ We are of-opn n that all the claims included under the
United States v. Boisdoré
The United States, Appellants, v. Etienne Alphonso Boisdoré, Laurent Boisdoré, Sidney Boisdoré, Mathilde and Alerine Nicolas, Widow of Manuel Fabre Danony, Caroline Nicolas, Elise Nicolas, Joseph Manuel de Labarre, Delphine Victoire de Laba
United States v. Guillem
The United States, Appellants, v. Baptiste Guillem, Claimant of One Box of Specie. A neutral leaving a belligerent country, in wbicíi he was domiciled at the commencement of the war; is entitled to the rights of a neutral in his person and
Oakey v. Bennett
Samuel W. Oakey, Plaintiff in error, v. John H. Bennett, Administrator of William Hall, and Join H. Illies. A decree in bankruptcy passed, in 1843, by the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana, did'not pa
United States v. Girault
The United States, Plaintiffs in error, v. James A. Girault, William M. Gwin, Hay Battle Harrison, and Alexander J. McMurtry. Where an action was brought by the United States upon the official bond of a receiver of public money, a plea that
Simon Gratz's Executors v. Cohen
Simon Gratz’s Executors and others, Appellants, v. Samuel M. Cohen and Eleazer L. Cohen. Where a deed was executed by an aged woman, the sole surviving executrix of her father, with power under the will to sell, with a view to put an end to
McNulty v. Batty
John McNulty, Plaintiff in error, v. John Batty and others. (See p. 72.)
Robinson v. Minor
Merritt M. Robinson and Marguerite his Wife, Aurore Gayoso, Fernando Gayoso, and Felicite Gayoso, Appellants, v. Wm. J. Minor, James C. Wilkins, and Henry Chotard, Executors of the Last Will and Testament of Katharine Minor, deceased, Franc
United States v. D'Auterive
The United States, Appellants, v. Jean Baptiste D’Auterive and others, Heirs and Representatives of the late Jean Antoine Bernard D’Ahterive. Following out the principles applied to the construction of treaties in the cases of United States
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.