Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1860 Cases
66 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gaines v. Hennen
Myra Clark Gaines, Appellant, v. Duncan N. Hennen. Since the case of Mrs. Gaines was before this .court, as reported in. 12 Howard, 537, the olographic will made by Daniel Clark-, in .1813, was ordered by the Supreme Court of Louisiana to b
Wheeler v. Nesbitt
John J. Wheeler, Plaintiff in Error, v. Andrew J. Nesbitt, Jerome Carding, Frederick M. Binkley, James D. Trimble, Wilson J. Mathis, and Robert McNeely. When the general issue is pleaded to an action on the ease for a malicious criminal pro
Berthold v. Goldsmith
Pierre A. Berthold, Alfred C. Bernondy, and Marklat Thompson, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Edward Goldsmith. To enlarge liis business, Goldsmith, the original plaintiff, authorized a thirc person to go to St. Louis to negotiate an arrangement wi
Belcher v. Linn
William H. Belcher, and Charles Belcher, Plaintiffs in Error, v. William A. Linn. The decision, in the preceding case, with respect to the duty upon barrels when made in the United States, and brought back from Cuba filled with molasses, ag
Knight v. Schell
James Knight, James H. West, and Robert Sargeant, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Augustus Schell. When barrels are manufaetured in the'United Sta'es and shipped empty to (Juba, there filled with molasses, and brought back to the United States, the
Belcher v. Linn
William H. Belcher and Charles Belcher, Plaintiffs in Error, v. William A. Linn. Where there was a controversy with respect to the amount'of duties .properly payable upon an importation, the collector and importers entered into 'an agreemen
Perin ex rel. Perin v. Carey
Charles McMicken Perin, Clyde Perin, and Mary E. Perin, infants, by their father and next friend, Franklin Perin, Complainants and Appellants, v. Freeman G. Carey, William Crossman, and William M. F. Hewson, executors of the last will and t
Howard v. Bugbee
Thacker B. Howard, Plaintiff in Error, v. Francis Bugbee. A s'a'ute of the State of .Alabama, authorizing a redemption of mortgaged property in two years after the sale under a decree, by bona fide creditors of the mortgagor, is unconstitut
Freeman v. Howe
Watson Freeman, Marshal of the United States, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jabez C. Howe, John H. Wilkins, and William Minot, Jun. Where the marshal, by virtue of mesne process issuing out of the Circuit Court of the United States for the distric
Curtis v. County of Butler
Jacob E. Curtis, Plaintiff, v. the County of Butler. On the 9th of February, 1853, the Legislature of Pennsylvania passed an act entitled “An act to incorporate the Northwestern Railroad Company.” By the seventh section, the counties throug
Suydam v. Williamson
James H. Suydam, Plaintiff in Error, v. William H. Williamson. Subsequently to the decisions of this court in the eases of Williamson v. Berry, Williamson v. the Irish Presbyterian Church, and Williamson v. Ball, re ported in 8 Howard, the
Tracy v. Holcombe
Alfred Tracy, surviving partner of Edward Tracy, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Holcombe. Where the judgment of the court below reverses the decision of the inferior court and awards a new trial, it is riot a final judgment from which a wri
Sheirburn v. De Cordova
Joseph A. Sheirburn, Plaintiff in Error, v. Jacob De Cordova and others. By a statute of Texas, actions of ejectment, trespass to try title, &c., can be maintained upon certificates for bead rights or other equitable titles. But -this court
Reddall v. Bryan
William C. Reddall, Plaintiff in Error, v. William H. Bryan, Alfred L. Rives, William H. Piles, John Cameron, James Paine, Charles Hutchinson, and John Moore. Where a decree of the Court of Appeals of Maryland affirmed the decree of the cou
Porter v. Foley
James D. Porter and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Bushrod W. Foley. Where an act of Assembly of the State of Kentucky was objected to indhe State court because said act and supplement were unconstitutional and void, the court properly con
Medberry v. Ohio
Arnold Medberry, John Lawhead, Robert H. Nugen, and Abner J. Dickenson, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the State of Ohio. Whether this court has or has not jurisdiction under the 25th section of the Judiciary act may be ascertained either from the
Adler v. Fenton
Joseph H. Adler, Lewis Schiff, Solomon Adler, and Lobe Rindskoff, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Aaron D. Fenton, Oliver H. Lee, William H. Davis, and Merrit T. Cole. Wheré a creditor, whose debt was not yet due at the time of bringing the action.
Lessee of Smith v. McCann
Lessee of Robert W. Smith and Carey W. Butt, Plaintiff in Error, v. William McCann. In Maryland, the distinction between common law and equity, as known to the English law, has been constantly preserved in its system of jurisprudence. The s
Clements v. Warner
John D. Clements, Appellant, v. Jonathan R. Warner. I.u 1850, Congress granted to the State of Illinois every alternate section of land for six sections in width on each side of a proposed railroad, and until the Staté could make its select
Bulkley v. Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co.
Henry T. Bulkley, claimant of the barque Edwin, Appellant, v. The Naumkeag Steam Cotton Company. At Mobile, it is necessary for a vessel drawing much water to lie outside of the bar and have-her cargo brought to her by lighters. The usage i
Board of Commissioners v. Aspinwall
The Board of Commissioners of Knox County, Plaintiffs in Error, v. William H. Aspinwall, Joseph W. Alsop, Henry Chancey, Charles Gould, and Samuel L. M. Barlow. Where the commissioners of a county have authority by statute to issue bonds, a
Amey v. Mayor of Allegheny City
Henry Amey, Plaintiff, v. the Mayor, Aldermen, and Citizens of Allegheny City. In 1848, the Legislature of. Ohio incorporated certain of it3 citizens under the name of the Ohio and Pennsylvania Railroad'Company; and in 1849, the Legislature
Massey v. Papin
Samuel Massey and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Joseph L. Papin. Before 1819, Mackay had a claim to land in Missouri under a Spanish grant, and in that year gaye a bond in' the nature of a mortgage on a part of the land to Delassus. ín 18
Tate v. Carney
Charles Tate and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. John G. Carney and others. Under several acts of Congress the register and receiver of the land office were authorized to grant a certificate to every person who should appear to be entitled
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.