Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1860 Cases
66 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Day v. Washburn
George W. Day, Bowen Matlock, Isaac H. Frothingham, and George W. Warner, Plaintiffs in Error, v. William A. Washburn and John A. Keith. Where creditors, who were so upon simple contract debts, filed a bill m chancery to set aside a deed ma
United States v. Castro
The United States, Appellants, v. Jose Castro and others As a general rule, in order to support a title to land in California under a Mexican grant, the written- evidence of the grant in the forme required by the ■ Mexican law must be found
Washington, Alexandria, & Georgetown Steam-Packet Co. v. Sickles
The Washington, Alexandria, and Georgetown Steam-Packet Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Frederic E. Sickles and Trueman Cook. The Washington, Alexandria, and Georgetown Steam-Packet Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Frederic E. Sickles and
Fackler v. Ford
John M. Fackler, Appellant, v. John R. Ford and others. The fourth and fifth sections of the act of Congress passed on the 31st of March, 1830, (4 Stat. at L., 392,) entitled “ An act for the relief of purchasers of pub . lie lands, and for
Mayer v. White
Charles F. Mayer, surviving Permanent Trustee of John Gooding, Appellant, v. William-Pinkney White, Administrator de bonis non of John Gooding and Robert M. Gibbes and Charles Oliver, surviving Executors of Robert Oliver, deceased. Another
Martin v. Thomas ex rel. Rogers
John T. Martin, Andrew Proudfit, and John Keefe, Plaintiffs in Error, v. William H. Thomas and Robert A. Baker, Administrators of Major J. Thomas, deceased, use of George T. Rogers. Where- there was an action of replevin in Wisconsin, by vi
Union Steamship Co. v. New York & Virginia Steamship Co.
The Union Steamship Company of Philadelphia, claimants and owners of the steamship Pennsylvania, her tackle, &c., Appellants, v. the New York and Virginia Steamship Company. In a collision which took place in Elizabeth river, in 1855, betwe
Wiggins v. Gray
William Wiggins, James M. Jones, and John B. Weller, Complainants, v. John B. Gray and Knowles Taylor. The Circuit Court certified that they had divided in opinion upon a question whether a party had a right to proceed summarily on motion t
Rector of Christ Church v. County of Philadelphia
The Rector, Church Wardens, and Vestrymen, of Christ Church, in the city of Philadelphia, in trust for Christ Church Hospital, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the County of Philadelphia. [n 1833, the Legislature- ofTemrsylvania -enacted that “the r
Bissell v. City of Jeffersonville
George B. Bissell, David T. Robinson, and Calvin Day, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the City of Jeffersonville. The common council of the city of Jeffersonville, in Indiana, had authority to subscribe for stock in a railroad company, and to issue
Cleveland Insurance v. Reed
The Cleveland Insurance Company, Appellants, v. George Reed, Juliet S. Reed, James H. Rogers, and the Milwaukie and Mississippi Railroad Company. Where a mortgagor's interest in land was sold under the bankrupt act of the ' United States, t
Lessee of Frost v. Frostburg Coal Co.
The Lessee of Isaiah Frost and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the Frostburg Coal Company. An. act of the- Legislature of Maryland examined whereby certain named persons,- and such others as might be associated with them, were incorporated
Greer v. Mezes
John Greer and others, Plaintiffs in Error, v. S. M. Mezes, Maria de la Solidad Ortega de Arguello, and Jose Ramon Arguello. Where the plaintiffs in ejectment showed a legal title to land in California undei a patent from the United States
Foote v. Egery
Henry S. Foote, Plaintiff in Error, v. Cyrus W. Egery and Joseph F. Smith. The decision in the preceding case of League ». Egery and others concludes this also. This case was brought up by writ of error from the District Court of the United
League v. Egery
Thomas M. League, Plaintiff in Error, v. Cyrus W. Egery, Joseph E. Smith, and Sarah A. Smith, Administratrix. By the colonization laws of Mexico passed in 1824 and 1828, the consent of the federal Executive of Mexico was essential to the va
Gue v. Tide Water Canal Co.
Robert Gue, Appellant, v. The Tide Water Canal Company. A corporate franchise to take tolls on a canal cannot be seized and sold under a fieri jadas, unless authorized by a statute 6f the State which granted the act of incorporation. Neithe
Powhatan Steamboat Co. v. Appomattox Railroad
The Powhatan Steamboat Company, Plaintiffs in Error, v. the Appomattox Railroad Company. In the code of Virginia, chapter 196, are the following sections, viz: “ Sec. 1C. If a free person, on a Sabbath day, be found laboring at any trade or
McEwen v. Den
William S. McEwen and Henry H. Wiley, Plaintiffs in Error, v. John Den, Lessee of Charles Bulkley and Stuart Brown. By the laws of Tennessee anterior to 1856, a deed for lands lying in Tennessee could not be acknowledged or proven in anothe
Thompson v. Roberts
William Thompson and John Pickell, Plaintiffs in Error, v. Lewis Roberts, Gideon R. Burbank, and Addison Roberts. The general rule of law is, that the judgment of a court of law or a deéree of á' court of equity, directly’upon the samé poin
Pearce v. Page
Christopher G. Pearce and others, incorporated and acting under the name of the Niles Works, Appellants, v. Jesse W. Page and others, claimants of the steamboat Doctor Robertson. Ill-a collision which took place.in the Ohio river between a
Chandler v. Von Roeder
James A. Chandler, Plaintiff in Error, v. Otto Von Roeder, Hamilton Ledbetter, and Charles Von Rosenburg. It is the duty of the court to determine the competency of evidence and to decide all legal questions that arise in the progress of a
Davila v. Mumford
Miguel Davila, Plaintiff in Error, v. David Mumford and Jesse Mumford. THe statute of limitations of Texas provides in its fifteenth section, “ that Avery suit to be instituted to recover real estate, as against him, her,- or them, in posse
Vigel v. Naylor
Susan Vigel, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry Naylor, administrator of George Naylor, deceased. On a petition for freedom, the petitioner proved that one Kirby had emancipated all his slaves by will; some immediately and some at a future day. T
Sampson v. Welsh
George R. Sampson and Lewis W. Tappan, merchants doing business under the names and firm of Sampson & Tappan, claimants of the ship Sarah, her tackle, apparel, and furniture, Appellants, v. Samuel Welsh, John Welsh, and William Welsh, tradi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.