Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1866 Cases
134 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sturdy v. Jackaway
Sturdy v. Jackaway. A final judgment pronounced in an action of ejectment, where the claim of title in fee simple absolute by the parties respectively was the solo subject of controversy, instituted and prosecuted under and according to the
Locke v. New Orleans
Locke v. New Orleans. 1. A statute -which simply authorizes the imposition of a tax according to a previous assessment is not retrospective. 2. Every retrospective act is not necessarily an ex post facto law. 3. Such laws embrace only such
Brown v. Wiley
Brown v. Wiley. 1. Under the act of March 3d, 1863, establishing the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, the action of that court can he examined here in no case in which like action in the Circuit Court of the district, whose place
Walker v. United States
Walker v. United States. The jurisdiction of this court to re-examine judgments of the Circuit Courts is limited to cases where the matter in dispute exceeds $2000. Where it hut equals that sum the jurisdiction docs not exist. The United St
United States v. Hoffman
United States v. Hoffman. 1. The writ of prohibition can only be used to prevent the doing of some act which is about to be done, and can never be used as a remedy for acts already completed. 2. Therefore, where the court to which the writ
McGee v. Mathis
McGee v. Mathis. Where a State, in order to-promote the drainage and sale of certain swamp lands belonging to it and which it was desirous of reclaiming, has passed, 'by way of encouraging purchasers, a law that such lands “ shall bo exempt
Brobst v. Brobst
Brobst et al. v. Brobst. This court -cannot take jurisdiction on a certificate of division in a case where the question certified is one of fact and can only be determined by an examination of the evidence in the record. This case came bere
Stearns v. United States
Stearns v. The United States. A certiorari for diminution of the record allowed under special circumstances, and where the cause had heen continued till the next term, although the motion for it was made after more than one term had passed
Duvall v. United States
DUVALL v. UNITED STATES. error, to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 145. Submitted March 27, 1866. Decided April 3, 1866. This court affirms after the close of the civil war, a judgment condemning a v
Williams v. Nolan
WILLIAMS v. NOLAN. ERROR TO COURT OE APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 288. Argued January 31, February 1, 2 and 5, 1866. Decided March 26, 1866. Reversed on the authority of Van Allen v. Assessors, 3 Wall. 573 The case is stated in the
Hammond v. Massachusetts
HAMMOND v. MASSACHUSETTS. McNEAL v. MASSACHUSETTS. CLARK v. MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OP MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 240, 241, 242. Submitted February 27, 1866. Decided March 26, 1866. McGuire v. Massachusetts, 3 Wall. 387, followe
Rogers v. Lee County
ROGERS v. LEE COUNTY. error to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 95. Submitted January 4, 1866. Decided January 22, 1866. Reversed on the authority of Boyers v. Keokuk, ante, 546. The case is stated in the
Rogers v. Keokuk
ROGERS v. KEOKUK. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM TIIE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 94. Submitted January 4, 1866. Decided January 22, 1866. The legislature of Iowa had power to authorize the city
United States v. De Haro
UNITED STATES v. DE HARO. MAHONEY, Intervenor, v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Nos. 81 and 146. Argued December 27 and 28, 1865. Decided January 15, 1866. A pla
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.