Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1866 Cases
134 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
The Springbok
The Springbok. 1. Though invocation, in prize cases, is not regularly made on original hearing, but only after a cause has been fully heard on the ship’s documents and the preparatory proofs, and where suspicious, circumstances appear from
United States v. McMasters
United States v. McMasters. 1. It, is the duty of a party excepting to evidence to point out the part excepted to, so that the attention of the court may be drawn to it. Hence objections of a very general and indefinite nature to testimony
Robbins v. Chicago City
Robbins v. Chicago City. 1. Parties having notice of the pendency of a suit in -which they are directly interested must exercise reasonable diligence in protecting their interests, and if instead of doing so they wilfully shut their eyes to
Railroad Co. v. Lindsay
Railroad Company v. Lindsay. 1. The article 8499 of the Civil Code of Louisiana, which proscribes that “actions for the payment of freight of ships and other vessels are prescribed by one>year,” does not apply to a case where the plaintiffs
United States v. Le Baron
United States v. Le Baron. 1. When a contract is alleged by the pleadings to have been made on a certain day, it is no variance to offer in evidence a written contract which took effect on a different day. 2. If it be proved that a bond bea
The Nassau
The Nassau. 1. The jurisdiction of a court of admiralty over a vessel captured jure belli, is determined by the fact of capture. The filing of a libel is not necessary to create it. 2. "When, under the act of Congress of the 25th March, 186
Ware v. United States
Ware v. United States. 1. Where — oil a suit by the United States against a deputy postmaster for damages in not paying over moneys which came to his hands during 'the r :: months next preceding the discontinuance (March 13th, 1862) of the
Pearson v. Duane
Pearson v. Duane. 1. Although a common carrier of passengers hy sea, as a master of a steamship, may properly refuse a passage to a person who has been forcibly expelled by the actual though violent and revolutionary authorities of a town,
Ryan v. Thomas
Ryan v. Thomas. Where a decision of the highest court of law or equity of a State is in favor of the validity of a statute of or an authority exercised under the United States, drawn in question in such court, this court, under the twenty-f
Bell v. Railroad Co.
Bell v. Railroad Company. 1. Municipal corporations, such as the- county boards of police usual in Mississippi, -when authorized by statute to do acts 'which otherwise they would have no power to do — such, for example, as subscribe to a ra
Sparrow v. Strong
Sparrow v. Strong. 1. This court will not take jurisdiction of a judgment shown by the context of the record to be but an order affirming a refusal of a court below to grant a new trial; even though the language of the record of affirmance
Newell v. Nixon
Newell v. Nixon. 1. Although no partnership may exist between them, yet whore two persons are joint owners of a vessel against which a claim exists for non-delivery of cargo, and one gives a note in the joint name for a balance agreed on as
The Hine v. Trevor
The Hine v. Trevor. 1. The doctrine of the case of The Genesee Chief, 12 Howard, that the admiralty jurisdiction of the Pederal courts, as granted by the Constitution, as not limited to tide-water, but extends -wherever vessels float and na
Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy
Von Hoffman v. City of Quincy. 1.. Where a statute has authorized a municipal corporation to issue bonds and to exercise the power of local taxation in order to pay them, and persons have bought and paid value for bonds issued accordingly,
Commissioner of Patents v. Whiteley
Commissioner of Patents v. Whiteley. 1. Where an applicant for reissue of a patent has done all in his power to make his application effectual — has filed his application with the acting commissioner and paid the requisite amount of fees —
Purcell v. Miner
Purcell v. Miner. A contract for the exchange of lands is as much within the statute of frauds as a contract for their sale, and a party seeking to enforce a specific execution of a parol contract for that purpose, must bring himself within
Bentley v. Coyne
Bentley v. Coyne. 1. Where a vessel has the wind free, or is sailing before or with the wind, she must keep out of the way of the vessel which is elosehauled hy the wind or sailing hy or against it. Those elosehauled on the wind, or sailing
Saulet v. Shepherd
Saulet v. Shepherd. 1. Under the practice prevailing in the Circuit Courts of the United States the finding of the facts by the court makes a case in the nature of a special verdict and is conclusive as to those facts; and this although the
Mississippi v. Johnson
The State of Mississippi v. Johnson, President. 1. The President of the United States cannot be restrained by injunction from carrying into effect an act of Congress alleged to be unconstitutional, nor -will a bill having such a purpose be
Thompson v. Bowie
Thompson v. Bowie. On an issue as to whether certain promissory notes, dated on a particular day, were given for money lost at play and therefore void, it is not allowable to prove that the party giving them was intoxicated on the day of th
Bradley v. People
Bradley v. The People. A tax on the capital of a hank is not the same thing as a tax upon the shares of ■which the capital is composed. And where a State imposes on the State hanks a tax on their capital (the shares in the hands of the shar
Davidson v. Lanier
Davidson v. Lanier. 1. It is not required that a -writ of error be allowed by a judge. It is enough that it is issued and served by copy lodged with the clerk of the court to which it is directed. 2. A mistake in the date of the writ of err
Supervisors v. United States
Supervisors v. United States, Ex relatione 1. On application hy a creditor for mandamus against county officers to levy a tax to pay a judgment, the defendant cannot impeach the judgment hy setting up that interest was improperly given in i
Semple v. Hagar
Semple v. Hagar. 1. When a want of jurisdiction is patent, or can be readily ascertained by an examination of the record in advance of an examination of the questions on the argument of the merits, this court will entertain and act upon a m
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.