Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1870 Cases
169 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Miller v. State
Miller et al. v. The State. Although a suit bo nominally by a State as the plaintiff, yet where the real plaintiffs are individuals — as ex gr. in a quo warranto, where the State is plaintiff ex relatione — the court will not advance, oven
Baker v. Morton
Baker v. Morton. 1. A deed procured through fear of loss of life, produced by threats of th'e grantee, may be avoided for duress. 2. A judgment being but a general lien and the creditor under it obtaining no incumbrance but on such estate a
Bigler v. Waller
Bigler v. Waller. On a bill filed in the Circuit Court for Virginia, against A. and B., tho administrators of both wore substituted on the record as defendants; A. and B. themselves having died after the bill was filed, and suggestion of th
The Eutaw
The Eutaw. When a case is within the jurisdiction of the court, and there'has been no defect in removing it from the subordinate court to this, the court will not dismiss the case on motion made out of the regular call of the docket. Motion
Mail Co. v. Flanders
Mail Company v. Flanders. 1. The Circuit Court of theTJnited States has no jurisdiction under the act of March 12th, 1863, commonly known as the Abandoned and Captured Property Act, where both parties are citizens of the same State. 2. Alth
Noonan v. Bradley
Noonan v. Bradley, Administrator. The court, — admitting that an administrator of a decedent appointed in one State'(that of his decedent’s residence), cannot, in the absence of statute, maintain an action in another State, to enforce an ob
Fowler v. Rathbones
Fowler v. Rathbones. 1. "Whore a ship and cargo are exposed at a particular place to a common peril of sinking, and becoming submerged in deep water, and the expense of raising and saving them from that place would be greater than if strand
French v. Shoemaker
French v. Shoemaker. 1. Where the whole law of a case before a Circuit Court is settled by a decree, and nothing remains to. be done, unless a new application shall be made at the foot of the decree, the decree is a final one, so far as res
Railroad Co. v. Harris
Railroad Company v. Harris. 1. Where a Maryland railroad corporation whose charter contemplated the extension of the road beyond tho limits of Maryland, was allowed by act of the legislature of Virginia — re-enacting tho Maryland charter in
Railroad Co. v. Dubois
Railroad Company v. Dubois. 1. Construction of Dubois’s patent, of September 23d, 1862, “for building piers for bridges, and setting the same.” Held, to bo for a device or instrument used in a process, and not for the process itself. 2. It
The Maria Martin
The Maria Martin. 1. Even flagrant fault committed by one of two vessels, approaching each other from opposite directions does not excuse the other from adopting every proper precaution required by the special circumstances of the case to p
Sturges v. Collector
Sturges v. The Collector. Under the 6th section of the act of March 3d, 1865, which enacts that “ there shall be hereafter collected and paid on all goods, wares, and merchandise, of the growth or produce of countries east of the Cape of Go
Collector v. Hubbard
The Collector v. Hubbard. 1. A promise on the part of a collector of taxes to repay a tax illegally collected and paid only under protest cannot be implied whore statute makes it the duty of such officer to pay into the public treasury with
Whiteley v. Kirby
Whiteley v. Kirby. The inventions of Nelson Piatt and of Alfred Churchill, patented, the former June 12,1849, the latter March 3d, 1841 (harvesters), contained nothing -which antedated the peculiar device secured by patent to Byron Dins-mor
Cook v. Burnley
Same Case. 1. An application to an inferior court to supply a lost record, being matter addressed to its discretion, is not a subject for writ of error. 2. If after a lost record of a case where judgment below has been affirmed, is supplied
Cook v. Burnley
Cook v. Burnley. 1. The title of Juan Cano, a colonist in the empressario grant of Martin De Leon, and to whom the commissioner of that colony conveyed a league of land April 11, 1835, was a good title. The case of White v. Burnley (20 Howa
Henderson's Tobacco
Henderson’s Tobacco. 1. Although a former statute is impliedly repealed by a subsequent one ■ plainly repugnant to it, or so far as the later statute’s making new provisions is plainly intended for a substitute for the earlier one, yet a re
Mann v. Rock Island Bank
Mann v. Rock Island Bank. In this case the court expresses its dissatisfaction with appeals being made whose only effect is to throw upon it the burden of making minute investigations and analyses of evidence in controversies where the case
United States v. Wright
United States v. Wright. Under the 5th section of the act of March 3, 1863 (12 Stat. at Large, 702), which declares that “whenever by reason of the presence of a military or naval force near any post-office, unusual business neorues thereat
United States v. Lynde
United States v. Lynde. 1. Under the treaty of cession of Louisiana, made with France, April 30th, 1803, the United States Government always claimed to the Perdido JRiver on the east, although the Spanish authorities kept possession of, and
Bank v. Carrollton Railroad
Bank v. Carrollton Railroad. 1. A party coming into the right of a partner, whether by purchase from such partner (no matter how broad the language of the conveyance may be) or as his personal representative, or under an execution or commis
Cherokee Tobacco
The Cherokee Tobacco. 1. The 107th section 'of the Internal Kevenue Act of July 20, 1868, which enacts that “the internal revenue laws imposing taxes on distilled spirits, fermented liquors,tobacco, snuff, and cigars, shall be construed to
Dunphy v. Kleinsmith
Dunphy v. Kleinsmith and Duer. 1. A complaint which is in form and substance such a complaint as is made in “a creditor’s bill,” is a case of equitable jurisdiction, and one requiring equitable relief as distinguished from legal. 2. In a Te
Reed v. United States
Reed v. United States. 1. An order by the United States to the owners of a vessel, during the rebellion, to get her ready, under pain of impressment, to transport a cargo to a particular place and back, under which order, though the owners
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.