Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1870 Cases
169 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
McVeigh v. United States
McVeigh v. United States. 1. In a libel of information for the forfeiture of property, under the act of Congress of July 17th, 1862, entitled “An act to suppress insurrection, to punish treason and rebellion, to seize and confiscate the pro
Garnett v. United States
Garnett v. United States. Where a case has been tried in the District Court of the District of Columbia, the judgment or decree rendered therein must be reviewed by the Supreme Court of the District, before the case can be brought before th
Levy v. Stewart
Levy v. Stewart. Though by the articles 3505 and 3506 of the civil code of Louisiana it is provided that bills and notes are prescribed in five years from their maturity, and that this prescription runs against minors, interdicted persons,
The Fannie
The Fannie. 1 A schooner meeting a steamer approaching her on a parallel line, with the difference of half a point in the courses of the two, held, in a collision case, upon the evidence, to have kept on her course, and therein to have done
May v. Le Claire
May v. Le Claire. 1. Contracts entered into in a spirit of peace and for the settlement of unadjusted demands on both sides, will not, where executed by persons of intelligence, and under circumstances which indicate caution and a knowledge
Insurance Co. v. Francis
Insurance Company v. Francis. An averment in a declaration that the defendant is a corporation created by an act of the legislature of the'State of New York, located in Aberdeen, Mississippi, and doing business there under the laws of the S
Insurance Co. v. Treasurer
Insurance Company v. The Treasurer. 1. A State statute directed a county treasurer to give certificates of indebtedness to any bank in the county for the amount of tax paid on its investments in the public indebtedness of the United States,
Case v. Terrell
Case v. Terrell. 1. No judgment for the payment of money can be rendered against the United States in any court other than the Court of Claims without a special act of Congress conferring jurisdiction. 2. A receiver of a National bank, whos
Generes v. Campbell
Generes v. Campbell. 1. The act of 3d March, 1865, providing for a trial without a jury, and a review by this court of the facts found by the judge, either generally or specially, by a sufficient bill of exceptions, is general in its terms,
Leon v. Galceran
Leon v. Galceran. 1. A suit for mariners’ wages in personam is maintainable at common law, &nd is within the exception of the ninth section of the Judiciary Act defining the admiralty jurisdiction. 2. It' is no objection to the jurisdiction
United States v. O'Keefe
United States v. O’Keefe. 1. By the proceeding known as a “petition of right,” the British government accords to citizens of the United States the right to prosecute claims against it. 2. Accordingly, British subjects, if otherwise entitled
Coal Co. v. Blatchford
Coal Company v. Blatchford. 1. In controversies between citizens of different States, where the jurisdiction of the courts of the United States depends upon the citizenship of the parties, if there are several co-plaintiffs, each plaintiff
The Sapphire
The Sapphire. 1. A foreign sovereign can bring a civil suit in the courts of the United States. 2. A claim arising by virtue of being such sovereign (such as an injury to a public ship of war) is not defeated, nor does suit therefor abate,
Farr v. Thomson
Farr v. Thomson et al. In which the preceding case was affirmed.
Amy v. Supervisors
Amy v. The Supervisors. 1. The State and National courts being independent of each other, neither can impede or arrest any action the other may take, within the limits of its jurisdiction, for the satisfaction of its judgments and decrees.
Transportation Co. v. Downer
Transportation Company v. Downer. 1. The terms “ dangers of lake navigation” include all tbe ordinary perils which attend navigation on the lakes, and among others, that which arises from shallowness of the waters at the entrance of harbors
Collector v. Day
The Collector v. Day. It is not competent for Congress under the Constitution of the United States to impose a tax upon the salary of a judicial officer of a State. Error to the Circuit Court for the District of Massachu-' setts; the case b
Dows v. City of Chicago
Dows v. City of Chicago. A suit in equity will not lie to restrain the collection of a tax on the sole ground that the tax is illegal. There must' exist in addition special circumstances, bringing the case under some recognized head of equi
New Albany v. Burke
New Albany v. Burke. A city subscribed to the stock of a railroad and issued bonds for a part of the subscription, agreeing to issue them for the rest of it when the road should be completed up to a certain point. The sale of the bonds was
United States v. Tynen
United States v. Tynen. 1. When there are two acts of Congress on the same subject, and the latter act embraces all the provisions of the first, and also new provisions, and imposes different or additional penalties, the latter act operates
The Protector
The Protector. An appeal dismissed because taken in the name of William A. Freeborn ‡ Co.; the court holding that no difference existed between writs of error and appeals as to the manner in which the names of the parties should be set fort
Morgan v. Thornhill
Morgan v. Thornhill. No appeal lies to this court from a decree of the Circuit Court of the United ■ States, exercising the supervisory jurisdiction conferred upon it by the second section of the Bankrupt Act of 2d March, 1867. On motion to
Virginia v. West Virginia
Virginia v. West Virginia. 1. This court has original jurisdiction, under the Constitution, of controversies between States of the Union concerning their boundaries. 2. This jurisdiction is not defeated because in deciding the question of b
Parmelee v. Lawrence
Parmelee v. Lawrence. 1. To authorize the re-examination of a question brought here as within the 25th section of the Judiciary Act, the conflict of the State law with the Constitution of the United States, and a decision by a State court i
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.